Brightsurf Science News and Current Science News Events
 

View Larger Image

Sudden Death and the Myth of CPR


by Stefan Timmermans, Bern Shen

List Price: $24.95
Available: Usually ships in 1 to 2 weeks
Sales Rank: 234488
Studio: Temple University Press
Binding: Paperback
Number Of Pages: 256
Publication Date: July 19, 1999
Publisher: Temple University Press


EDITORIAL REVIEWS

Book Description
Sudden Death and the Myth of CPR is for anyone who has taken a CPR course or who believes the images from television dramas. It is also for families of victims and survivors of CPR. It will engage emergency personnel, others in the medical field, and anyone concerned with ethical issues of death and dying.

Anyone who has ever taken a CPR course has wondered, "What would happen if I actually had to use CPR?" In Western societies, the lifesaving power of resuscitation has the status of a revered cultural myth. It promises life in the face of sudden death, but the reality is that lives are rarely saved. Medical researchers estimate the survival rate for out-of-hospital CPR to be between 1 and 3 percent. Sudden Death and the Myth of CPR explores the history of this medical innovation and the promotion of its effectiveness.

The overuse of resuscitation, Timmermans explains, defines people's experience with sudden death, something he learned firsthand by following the practice of lifesaving from street corner to emergency room. He argues that very few people are successfully resuscitated without brain damage despite the promotion of CPR's effectiveness through powerful media images. In vivid accounts of the day-to-day practices of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in one of the only studies of sudden death, Timmermans records the astonishingly frank comments of emergency personnel. Doctors, nurses, social workers, and paramedics express emotions from cynicism about going through the futile motions to genuine concern for victims' family members.

If a person who was supposed to keep on living dies at the end of a resuscitative attempt, how socially meaningful is the dying? Timmermans asks tough questions and addresses the controversial ethical issues about the appropriateness of interfering with life and death. He suggests policy reforms and the restoration of dignity to sudden death.



CUSTOMER REVIEWS (Average Customer Rating: 4.0 based on 7 reviews)

Glaring mistakes undermine the book's intention  
If you have any medical knowledge in resuscitation, there are some glaring examples in the book that the author really doesn't know what happens in a resuscitation event. Examples like:
1)"Knickerbocker...noticed that the dogs' blood pressure would increase when he put the heavy fifteen-pound paddles" (50)
2)"...or a prolonged pulseless anginal rhythm..." (122)
3)"LANKER: She must not even have a 60 [heart rate]. JOHNSON: Well, I feel a carotid [pulse]. So it should be at least a 60." (142)

While these examples seem small, the inaccuracies can seriously damage the author's credibility. Using the above examples, here's why:
1) The paddles DID NOT weigh fifteen pounds! The doctor needed to APPLY 15 POUNDS OF PRESSURE to the dogs chest to activate a safety switch. This is what caused the blood pressure to suddenly peak in the dog. We still apply several pounds of pressure to defibrillator paddles today; if the author had read a advanced cardiac resuscitation book he would learn of this.
2)Angina is the wrong word. Angina, or "heart pain" has nothing to do with the situation. Rather, the word should be "agonal" which means "dying".
3)When the nurse here says "60", she is not referring to the heart rate, but blood pressure. (We know this by reading the next line.) There is a big difference between the two, and the difference has clinical significance. (Traditionally, a carotid [neck] pulse, which is mentioned in the next line, indicates that the blood pressure is at least 60mmg.)

The book comes to some very strange conclusions ("Mouth to mouth remains an unarousing sexual act" Page 93) and some vivid and imaginative descriptions of CPR. ("CPR is unusual in the way it brings strangers into intimate contact. First the rescuer "kisses" the unconscious person, then "hits" the person hard. We love life, hate death, love life, hate death in a perpetual rhythm." Page 93)

This is obviously a well-intentioned book, but I feel disappointed in the many mistakes, strange conclusions and unrealistic suggestions. (The author suggests that everyone should carry some form of ID that states whether or not they want CPR done to them. Not only would this be a logistical nightmare, what happens if the card isn't with the person? Will rescuers fear helping people just because they don't have a card? Terrible and frightening idea!)

This is a more of a "thinking" book...it gets you thinking. But if one believes that the book shows all the sides of resuscitation, they are wrong...
February 17, 2002


Informative and caring  
I work in emergency medicine and was sure I would hate this book. But I actually like it very much. Timmermans gives a nuanced and empathetic view of resuscitating. He explains how paramedics and emergency room staff are trapped in a double bind. Relatives expect them to save lives but resuscitation techniques rarely succeed in saving lives. The result are unrealistic expectations. Timmermans does a good job exploring the colorful history of resuscitation techniques and the role of insurance companies and managed care. I only wish he paid more attention to automatic defibrillators.
February 18, 2001

Loved the book.  
I loved this book. It is on a painful topic but it answered some nagging questions for me. My mother died unexpectedly and I never forgave my father for not staying with her during her last moments and always wondered why CPR did not keep her alive. This book provided some answers. It is informative and compassionate.
January 18, 2001

"The Dignity of Sudden Death"? Give Me A Break!  
Though Timmermans brings up many valid issues in this book, I disagree strongly with the idea of "restoration of dignity to sudden death". This seems like a make-nice way of saying not to upset family members with chest smacking and electric jolts of defibrillation.

Please! Dignity is for bystanders who don't want their sensibilities upset, not for the guy on the stretcher. I know. I was that guy. I may hold the world record for being revived. During a massive heart attack, I was defibrillated 72 times. It took almost three hours of work to bring me back. And guess what? I wasn't the slightest bit concerned with dignity. I just wanted them to keep working until they got me back.

Did I care if my chest was fried from the voltage? No.

Did I care that they stripped me and half a dozen people were handling me? No.

All I cared about was getting back so I could see my wife and I didn't give a tinker's damn what they did to me. Now, it's five years later and I am healthy.

Yes, only a fraction of people who arrest survive resuscitation. But some do. Resuscitation, by definition, is a last-ditch, desperate measure. Admittedly, most victims won't make it. But that's not why we do it. We do it for the ones who DO make it....
December 31, 2000


A good, but confusing book.  
This book has many strong points-the history of resuscitation is an excellent resource in this book. However, I must point out that the author's stances later in the book is slightly confusing- it is hard to see which side the author is "on"- is he Pro-CPR, Pro-CPR only during some situations, or Don't-Do-CPR at all? The concluding statement he makes still confuses me, as he implies that CPR should be done on particular patients...but how would you decide? This statement makes me believe that instead of improving CPR or its adjunts, it is better to decide who lives or dies before a person dies... His three stories on resuscitation events are quite unfair- showing that all of them "failed"; it does strengthen his view, but the familes were all "willing" to accept the patient's deaths- what if the familes were in anger or denial? What is CPR was not done at all- would the familes react differently, as they helplessly stood by? Also, some comments about Paramedics or Nurses seem to critise them, dispite their hard, yet necessary, job. Nevertheless, this book brings a good perspective to CPR and its "myth". Strongly written, it does its best to answer questions about resuscitation and its true face. I will still do CPR if I had to, dispite the book's stance, but I am now more aware and understanding of the probable outcome that is likely to result with my efforts.
May 11, 2000


SIMILAR PRODUCTS

How Doctors Think
by Jerome Groopman

The Spirit Catches You and You Fall Down
by Anne Fadiman

Mama Might Be Better Off Dead: The Failure of Health Care in Urban America
by Laurie Kaye Abraham

The Surgeons: Life and Death in a Top Heart Center
by Charles R. Morris

Postmortem: How Medical Examiners Explain Suspicious Deaths (Fieldwork Encounters and Discoveries)
by Stefan Timmermans

© 2008 BrightSurf.com