| View Larger Image | The Selfish Gene: 30th Anniversary Edition--with a new Introduction by the Author | Paperbackby Richard Dawkins (Author)
| List Price: | $19.95 | | Price: | $13.57 | | You Save: | $6.38 (32%) | | | Available: | Usually ships in 24 hours |
| | Binding: | Paperback | | Publisher: | Oxford University Press, USA | | Edition: | 3rd Edition | | Page Count: | 384 Pages | | Publication Date: | May 25, 2006 | | Sales Rank: | 1,220st |
|
FEATURES | - ISBN13: 9780199291151
- Condition: NEW
- Notes: Brand New from Publisher. No Remainder Mark.
- Click here to view our Condition Guide and Shipping Prices
|
EDITORIAL REVIEWS |
Product Description
Richard Dawkins' brilliant reformulation of the theory of natural selection has the rare distinction of having provoked as much excitement and interest outside the scientific community as within it. His theories have helped change the whole nature of the study of social biology, and have forced thousands of readers to rethink their beliefs about life. In his internationally bestselling, now classic volume, The Selfish Gene, Dawkins explains how the selfish gene can also be a subtle gene. The world of the selfish gene revolves around savage competition, ruthless exploitation, and deceit, and yet, Dawkins argues, acts of apparent altruism do exist in nature. Bees, for example, will commit suicide when they sting to protect the hive, and birds will risk their lives to warn the flock of an approaching hawk. This 30th anniversary edition of Dawkins' fascinating book retains all original material, including the two enlightening chapters added in the second edition. In a new Introduction the author presents his thoughts thirty years after the publication of his first and most famous book, while the inclusion of the two-page original Foreword by brilliant American scientist Robert Trivers shows the enthusiastic reaction of the scientific community at that time. This edition is a celebration of a remarkable exposition of evolutionary thought, a work that has been widely hailed for its stylistic brilliance and deep scientific insights, and that continues to stimulate whole new areas of research today. |
Amazon.com Review
Inheriting the mantle of revolutionary biologist from Darwin, Watson, and Crick, Richard Dawkins forced an enormous change in the way we see ourselves and the world with the publication of The Selfish Gene. Suppose, instead of thinking about organisms using genes to reproduce themselves, as we had since Mendel's work was rediscovered, we turn it around and imagine that "our" genes build and maintain us in order to make more genes. That simple reversal seems to answer many puzzlers which had stumped scientists for years, and we haven't thought of evolution in the same way since. Why are there miles and miles of "unused" DNA within each of our bodies? Why should a bee give up its own chance to reproduce to help raise her sisters and brothers? With a prophet's clarity, Dawkins told us the answers from the perspective of molecules competing for limited space and resources to produce more of their own kind. Drawing fascinating examples from every field of biology, he paved the way for a serious re-evaluation of evolution. He also introduced the concept of self-reproducing ideas, or memes, which (seemingly) use humans exclusively for their propagation. If we are puppets, he says, at least we can try to understand our strings. --Rob Lightner |
CUSTOMER REVIEWS (Average Customer Rating: 4.5 based on 317 reviews)
|
My favourite book to date. by L. Young (Canada)  5 Stars
November 27, 2009
This book is a classic and a masterpiece. I think that the majority of people misinterpret this book by the title of it. It could've easily also have been given the title 'The Altruistic Individual' for the majority of the book it discusses reciprocal altruisim, and why individuals are altruistic based on what it best for their genes. We are essientially gene machines, doing what's best for our genes; however, the genes have provided us with the ability to rebel against them (i.e contraception)
Dawkins also introduces the theory of the meme. Basically, as genes are in natural selection and reproduction - so memes are to human selection and cultural reproduction.
Buy the book! Amazing read!
| |
Simply amazing by Common Sense 5 Stars
November 09, 2009
It's one of the best books I've read!
I found the chapter about game theory particularly interesting and useful. Richard described the theory better than anyone else I've read.
| |
A revolutionary book that examines evolution from the gene's perspective by Kyle Odom (San Diego, CA USA) 5 Stars
September 24, 2009
This book is just as exciting as it is groundbreaking. The idea behind it carries much weight and force, and is very hard to argue against. It is a universal fact that every organism's primary concern is survival, save for a few strange exceptions. Dawkins provides lucid metaphors and in depth explanations as to how evolution works from a genetic viewpoint, and how our behavior is ultimately aimed at propagating our genes.
Dawkins talks alot about genes that determine behavior, or 'miss-firing' genes causing deviant or irregular behavior. I would agree that our genes may predispose us to inherit certain traits or behaviors to some extent, but our enviornment and other external influences undoubtedly contribute to effect our behavior as well.
One concept I can't entirely agree with Mr. Dawkins on is that of Memes. Yes, ideas are spread from person to person, and they effect our culture, etc, but they are products of our own minds, not seperate entities. Also, a meme cannot be analyzed, nor does it have any specific substance, it seems to me like an imaginary thought replicator. To me the whole idea is so entirely subjective and speculative that I do not feel it is legitimate. However, his example of a meme that causes a fear of going to hell was a very good example. I prefer to name credulity and superstition as the causal factors.
Overall, this book is very well written, and the examples given to support the selfish gene theory are superb. I highly recommend this book to anyone considering it, you won't be dissapointed!
| |
Thank God for selfish genes by Ashtar Command (Stockholm, Sweden) 5 Stars
September 20, 2009
This is not really a review of Richard Dawkins' book "The Selfish Gene". Rather, it's a rant about that provocative and annoying metaphor and sound bite. Which one? Why, the selfish gene, of course!
Personally, I find the metaphor unfortunate. Dawkins himself admits that much in a mea culpa foreword to this new edition, writing that he may as well have titled the book "The Eternal Gene" or "The Altruistic Vehicle". Indeed, he could have gone one step further. Why not call it "The Altruistic Gene"? After all, most genes co-operate with other genes (that's why *we* are here), so you might as well call the genes - or most genes - altruist. Dawkins seems to have picked his metaphor due to abstruse philosophical reasons, but since he also writes "we are born selfish", this obviously gives the impression that the genes, too, are selfish in this vernacular sense.
However, one could also turn the debate around, and ask: What's so wrong with selfish genes anyway? But perhaps it's better to rephrase the question, and ask: What's so wrong with "selfish" organisms? According to Neo-Darwinism, altruism has evolved for two, perhaps three, reasons. First, there is altruism towards kin, as when birds have "helpers" at their nests. Second, there is reciprocal altruism, the classical example being the vampire bats. Thus, altruism is ultimately "selfish" in the sense that it either helps promoting the genes of your relatives (which are similar to your own genes), or is based on the principle "I scratch your back and you scratch mine". The third reason, perhaps only applicable to humans, is broadly similar to the second. Humans often carry out altruist acts which certainly seem completely unselfish. However, this could simply be a way of signalling that you are a reliable person when it comes to altruism towards kin, or reciprocal altruism. In other words, even unselfish acts are at bottom rooted in a kind of genetic or organism-related selfishness.
To some people, this sounds awful and terrible. Isn't there any *really* real altruism in the world, then? This impression of awfulness is often added to by a certain kind of evolutionary biologist, who just loves to respond "no" to this question. Well, if you believe that "real" altruism means doing what Jesus said in the Sermon on the Mount, for purely Kantian reasons, then (of course) there is no "real" altruism in the world. After all, there are no deontological robots set on self-destruct!
But, honestly, is that really such a bad thing?
Imagine a world in which half the organisms would be programmed by evolution to unselfishly, unthinkingly serve the other half, who are not programmed in this way, and hence take advantage of the poor and purely altruistic creatures. Would we really want to live in such a world? I think not. It would be the worst form of oppression and exploitation!
Thank God for the selfish genes...
I consider it a *positive* that altruism is based in "selfishness". And no, I'm not a Randian. Quite the contrary. The fact that altruism towards kin, and reciprocal altruism towards non-kin, evolves for "selfish" reasons, show that there isn't any necessary contradiction between the social and the individual, between the collective and the personal, between "one for all" and "all for one". Really, what more do we want? Deontological ants?
Incidentally, I don't believe that all unselfish human actions are "really" based on the need for social recognition. Humans are much more complex than that. We have evolved to a point where we can change the human nature evolution has given us - not completely, to be sure, but to a sufficiently large degree to stand out among other organisms. As Dawkins once put it: "I'm not particularly interested in humans. That's only one species, and a particularly aberrant one at that". Precisely. We don't need to explain Holocaust rescuers, Christian martyrs or even pet-owners who save their dogs from dangerous fires by claiming that this is directly "adaptive". It isn't. Why does it have to be? Is religion or abstract math "adaptive"? What about Rococo paintings? But even if it could be proven that Holocaust rescue is "adaptive" in the sense that this acts of conscience is really rooted in our not-so-altruistic need for self-recognition, so what? I'm sure the Jews didn't mind. The Nazis, for their part, did!
What's the point of this non-review? Nothing, really, except perhaps to wake some people up from their dogmatic slumber...
| |
Outstanding explanation of evolution for the Lay Person by J. M. Lawniczak 5 Stars
August 18, 2009
Professor Dawkins's book on evolution is geared to the non-scientist and presents evolution, and the underlying idea that it is the gene that is surviving not the organism, in clear, understandable and interesting language. It is a must read for anyone interested in the topic. In particular, the Professor gives numerous examples that illustrate his points, which sustain the interest throughout.
| |
SIMILAR PRODUCTS |
| The Blind Watchmaker: Why the Evidence of Evolution Reveals a Universe without Design
by Richard Dawkins (Author)
Patiently and lucidly, this Los Angeles Times Book Award and Royal Society of Literature Heinemann Prize winner identifies the aspects of the theory of evolution that people find hard to believe and removes the barriers to credibility one by one. "As readable and vigorous a defense of Darwinism as has been published since 1859."--The Economist.
| 
| The Extended Phenotype: The Long Reach of the Gene (Popular Science)
by Richard Dawkins (Author)
This is a revised edition with a new afterword by Daniel Dennett. The Extended Phenotype carries on from where The Selfish Gene takes off. It is a fascinating look at the evolution of life and natural selection. Dawkins's theory is that individual organisms are replicators that have extended phenotypic effects on society and the world at large, thus our genes have the ability to manipulate other individuals. A worldwide bestseller, this book has become a classic in popular science writing.
| 
| The Red Queen: Sex and the Evolution of Human Nature
by Matt Ridley (Author)
Referring to Lewis Carroll's Red Queen from Through the Looking-Glass, a character who has to keep running to stay in the same place, Matt Ridley demonstrates why sex is humanity's best strategy for outwitting its constantly mutating internal predators. The Red Queen answers dozens of other riddles of human nature and culture -- including why men propose marriage, the method behind our maddening notions of beauty, and the disquieting fact that a woman is more likely to conceive a child by an...
| 
| The God Delusion
by Richard Dawkins (Author)
In his sensational international bestseller, the preeminent scientist and outspoken atheist Richard Dawkins delivers a hard-hitting, impassioned, but humorous rebuttal of religious belief. With rigor and wit, Dawkins eviscerates the arguments for religion and demonstrates the supreme improbability of the existence of a supreme being. He makes a compelling case that faith is not just irrational, but potentially deadly. In a preface written for the paperback edition, Dawkins responds to some of...
| 
| The Ancestor's Tale: A Pilgrimage to the Dawn of Evolution
by Richard Dawkins (Author)
With unparalleled wit, clarity, and intelligence, Richard Dawkins, one of the world's most renowned evolutionary biologists, has introduced countless readers to the wonders of science in works such as The Selfish Gene. Now, in The Ancestor's Tale, Dawkins offers a masterwork: an exhilarating reverse tour through evolution, from present-day humans back to the microbial beginnings of life four billion years ago. Throughout the journey Dawkins spins entertaining, insightful stories and sheds light...
|
|
|
