| View Larger Image | When Is Discrimination Wrong? | Hardcoverby Deborah Hellman (Author)
| List Price: | $39.95 | | Price: | $32.04 | | You Save: | $7.91 (20%) | | | Available: | Usually ships in 24 hours |
| | Binding: | Hardcover | | Publisher: | Harvard University Press | | Page Count: | 216 Pages | | Publication Date: | May 30, 2008 | | Sales Rank: | 925,498th |
|
EDITORIAL REVIEWS |
Product Description
A law requires black bus passengers to sit in the back of the bus. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approves a drug for use by black heart failure patients. A state refuses to license drivers under age 16. A company avoids hiring women between the ages of 20 and 40. We routinely draw distinctions among people on the basis of characteristics that they possess or lack. While some distinctions are benign, many are morally troubling. In this boldly conceived book, Deborah Hellman develops a much-needed general theory of discrimination. She demonstrates that many familiar ideas about when discrimination is wrong—when it is motivated by prejudice, grounded in stereotypes, or simply departs from merit-based decision-making—won’t adequately explain our widely shared intuitions. Hellman argues that, in the end, distinguishing among people on the basis of traits is wrong when it demeans any of the people affected. She deftly explores the question of how we determine what is in fact demeaning. Claims of wrongful discrimination are among the most common moral claims asserted in public and private life. Yet the roots of these claims are often left unanalyzed. When Is Discrimination Wrong? explores what it means to treat people as equals and thus takes up a central problem of democracy. (20080904) |
CUSTOMER REVIEWS (Average Customer Rating: 5.0 based on 1 review)
|
The cure for the "I know discrimination when I see it" argument. by Joshua G. Feldman (New York)  5 Stars
June 06, 2008
"Isn't discrimination always wrong?" That's what people say when they see the deliberately provocative title of this book. Of course in reality the issue isn't so simple. Is it wrong for the FDA to approve a particular drug for African Americans specifically if it addresses a health problems of that population? Is it wrongful discrimination for a nursing home for women to only hire women as attendants? Most of us know wrongful discrimination when we see it: separate but equal; blacks forced to sit at the back of the bus; ethnic quotas on immigration; glass ceilings, etc... But what is it precisely that makes wrongful discrimination wrong? How does that apply to the vague and thorny gray areas where all the trouble lies?
Deborah Hellman does a terrific job of framing the problem, summarizing existing scholarship and legal theory on the subject, and then coming to her own conclusions. She very clearly puts each theoretical argument in its place and then draws an all encompassing frame around them - a bedrock principle that cuts to the heart of the issue and neatly addresses its core. She states it clearly at the conclusion of Chapter 1: "Discrimination is wrong when it demeans. To demean is to treat another as less worthy." She spends the rest of the book precisely defining her terms (for example membership in a stigmatized group matters) and carefully examining alternatives and counter arguments. By bringing everything back to a simple moral principle her work feels in spirit akin to those of the framers of the constitution. It's that kind of clear and powerful thinking: reduction to first principles; simple truths that we hold to be self evident.
Hellman's analysis is deep. She addresses case law, sure, but also sociology and philosophy (both semantics and moral). We hear from Irving Goffman John Hart Ely, Owen Fiss, Catherine McKinnon, Ronald Dworkin, Christopher McCrudden, Brian Leiter, and many others. She addresses the issue of the role of group identity (both in terms of history of mistreatment and social disadvantage and to how it relates to offense against the individual versus just the group as a whole). She addresses the question of merit as a form of positive discrimination - devotes a whole chapter to it, defining the limits of the various approaches and how her central thesis puts limits on how drawing merit distinctions should be used. This is a short, dense, book. Hellman's language is economical. The subject requires abstract thinking quite often, which is difficult. Hellman bends over backwards to help you keep the fine distinctions in focus, frequently summarizing, reviewing, and restating her conclusions.
To say that this book influenced my perception of the issue is an understatement. It certainly educated me on the issue of wrongful discrimination and I will never again be able to view the issue without considering her analysis. However, her argument is so pervasive and well organized that its instructional power extends beyond just the topic at hand - it is really a clinic on how to think about any moral issue. Highly recommended.
| |
SIMILAR PRODUCTS |
| The Constitution in 2020
by Jack M. Balkin (Editor), Reva B. Siegel (Editor)
The Constitution in 2020 is a powerful blueprint for implementing a more progressive vision of constitutional law in the years ahead. Edited by two of America's leading constitutional scholars, the book provides a new framework for addressing the most important constitutional issues of the future in clear, accessible language. Featuring some of America's finest legal minds--Cass Sunstein, Bruce Ackerman, Robert Post, Harold Koh, Larry Kramer, Noah Feldman, Pam Karlan, William Eskridge, Mark...
| 
| The Invisible Constitution (Inalienable Rights)
by Laurence H. Tribe (Author)
As everyone knows, the United States Constitution is a tangible, visible document. Many see it in fact as a sacred text, holding no meaning other than that which is clearly visible on the page. Yet as renowned legal scholar Laurence Tribe shows, what is not written in the Constitution plays a key role in its interpretation. Indeed some of the most contentious Constitutional debates of our time hinge on the extent to which it can admit of divergent readings.
In The Invisible...
| 
| Moral Dimensions: Permissibility, Meaning, Blame
by T. M. Scanlon (Author)
In a clear and elegant style, T. M. Scanlon reframes current philosophical debates as he explores the moral permissibility of an action. Permissibility may seem to depend on the agent’s reasons for performing an action. For example, there seems to be an important moral difference between tactical bombing and a campaign by terrorists—even if the same number of non-combatants are killed—and this difference may seem to lie in the agents’ respective aims. However, Scanlon argues that...
| 
| The Idea of Justice
by Professor Amartya Sen (Author)
Social justice: an ideal, forever beyond our grasp; or one of many practical possibilities? More than a matter of intellectual discourse, the idea of justice plays a real role in how—and how well—people live. And in this book the distinguished scholar Amartya Sen offers a powerful critique of the theory of social justice that, in its grip on social and political thinking, has long left practical realities far behind. The transcendental theory of justice, the subject of...
| 
| What Blood Won't Tell: A History of Race on Trial in America
by Ariela J. Gross (Author)
Is race something we know when we see it? In 1857, Alexina Morrison, a slave in Louisiana, ran away from her master and surrendered herself to the parish jail for protection. Blue-eyed and blond, Morrison successfully convinced white society that she was one of them. When she sued for her freedom, witnesses assured the jury that she was white, and that they would have known if she had a drop of African blood. Morrison’s court trial—and many others over the last 150 years—involved...
|
|
|
