| View Larger Image | Liberal Fascism: The Secret History of the American Left, From Mussolini to the Politics of Change | Paperbackby Jonah Goldberg (Author)
| List Price: | $17.00 | | Price: | $11.56 | | You Save: | $5.44 (32%) | | | Available: | Usually ships in 24 hours |
| | Binding: | Paperback | | Publisher: | Broadway | | Page Count: | 512 Pages | | Publication Date: | June 02, 2009 | | Sales Rank: | 12,343th |
|
FEATURES | - ISBN13: 9780767917186
- Condition: NEW
- Notes: Brand New from Publisher. No Remainder Mark.
- Click here to view our Condition Guide and Shipping Prices
|
EDITORIAL REVIEWS |
Product Description
“Fascists,” “Brownshirts,” “jackbooted stormtroopers”—such are the insults typically hurled at conservatives by their liberal opponents. Calling someone a fascist is the fastest way to shut them up, defining their views as beyond the political pale. But who are the real fascists in our midst?Liberal Fascism offers a startling new perspective on the theories and practices that define fascist politics. Replacing conveniently manufactured myths with surprising and enlightening research, Jonah Goldberg reminds us that the original fascists were really on the left, and that liberals from Woodrow Wilson to FDR to Hillary Clinton have advocated policies and principles remarkably similar to those of Hitler's National Socialism and Mussolini's Fascism.Contrary to what most people think, the Nazis were ardent socialists (hence the term “National socialism”). They believed in free health care and guaranteed jobs. They confiscated inherited wealth and spent vast sums on public education. They purged the church from public policy, promoted a new form of pagan spirituality, and inserted the authority of the state into every nook and cranny of daily life. The Nazis declared war on smoking, supported abortion, euthanasia, and gun control. They loathed the free market, provided generous pensions for the elderly, and maintained a strict racial quota system in their universities—where campus speech codes were all the rage. The Nazis led the world in organic farming and alternative medicine. Hitler was a strict vegetarian, and Himmler was an animal rights activist.Do these striking parallels mean that today’s liberals are genocidal maniacs, intent on conquering the world and imposing a new racial order? Not at all. Yet it is hard to deny that modern progressivism and classical fascism shared the same intellectual roots. We often forget, for example, that Mussolini and Hitler had many admirers in the United States. W.E.B. Du Bois was inspired by Hitler's Germany, and Irving Berlin praised Mussolini in song. Many fascist tenets were espoused by American progressives like John Dewey and Woodrow Wilson, and FDR incorporated fascist policies in the New Deal.Fascism was an international movement that appeared in different forms in different countries, depending on the vagaries of national culture and temperament. In Germany, fascism appeared as genocidal racist nationalism. In America, it took a “friendlier,” more liberal form. The modern heirs of this “friendly fascist” tradition include the New York Times, the Democratic Party, the Ivy League professoriate, and the liberals of Hollywood. The quintessential Liberal Fascist isn't an SS storm trooper; it is a female grade school teacher with an education degree from Brown or Swarthmore.These assertions may sound strange to modern ears, but that is because we have forgotten what fascism is. In this angry, funny, smart, contentious book, Jonah Goldberg turns our preconceptions inside out and shows us the true meaning of Liberal Fascism. |
CUSTOMER REVIEWS (Average Customer Rating: 4.0 based on 500 reviews)
|
Unreadable...same old Chicken-Little hysteria. by clutchhitter (Boca Raton, FL USA)  2 Stars
November 25, 2009
This book is unreadable....to be fair, I only got 50 pages into it at the library AND I am a moderate. However, having read Goldberg's columns on-line, he is really sort of a joke: recycling the same old imperialist arguments, supporting the Iraq war...then reversing opinion and again blaming liberals.
He tries to dress up his follow-the-pack conservatism with historical references, but I found the attempt half-hearted and really by shifting a few words around you could make the opposite case.
So, Jonah....sorry dude, your reinforce the fact that your mother got you where you are...you add nothing new to an already tiresome debate leaving moderates like myself to scratch my head and wonder what all your Chicken-Little ranting is about....you're as bad as Dinesh and Ann.
| |
Chaotic writing style, scattershot arguments, and disappointing by P. Johnson (Colorado) 2 Stars
November 17, 2009
I was looking forward to reading this book as a one volume treatise shattering the myths about progressivism & putting political history into its proper perspective. However, I found that Goldberg's writing suffers from ADD. The author starts off on one topic, let's say Hillary Clinton & "It Takes a Village" for example, and then runs off to chase down the life story of a minor historical character/political influence -- and then never really return to the interesting premise he set-up. The whole book reads like a bunch of great false-starts in terms of story-telling and then gets distracted by its own copious research. The author would have been better suited to slowing down and writing several books covering this broad subject, or focusing one book on the most relevant historical incidents cited in the book. I now find myself creating a new reading list to go back and read about Woodrow Wilson & FDR's New Deal on their own rather than in the messy way he explored the topics in this book.
| |
An accurate depiction of fascism as an ideology of the left by Charles Rowley (Fairfax, Virginia, USA)  5 Stars
November 11, 2009
I have purchased and read this important book. Goldberg correctly depicts fascism as a cocept and tool deployed by the left and not the right. In its most diabolical form it was deployed by such believers in nationalism and socialism as Mussolini, Hitler, Peron, Lenin, Stalin, Mao and Castro in Utopean dreams to improve mankind. True believers were and are motivated by a desire to impose their own preferences in order to perfect the nature of man, to collectivise mankind in pursuit of nationalist, imperialist, often racist goals, and to organize individuals into malevolent public and private assocviations designed to override the economic discipline of free markets. Liberal fascism is defined by Goldberg as a softer but no less evil brand of the same product, pursued in the United States by progressives of the left, epitomized by Woodrow Wilson, FDR, Lyndon Johnson, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, in direct attacks on the United States Constitution and the laissez-faire basis of its market economy. Any person who is concerned to defend property rights, individual freedom, limited government and the rule of law should look to the right, not to the left to support him in this ideal. Goldberg's book is courageous and effective in outlining the true nature of fascism as the definition of the American Left since the early twentieth century.
Charles Rowley, Duncan Black Professor of Economics at George Mason University, and co-author of Economic Contractions in the United States: A Failure of GovernmentEconomic Contractions in the United States: A Failure of Government
| |
Good Book by Cynthia Ann Stricklan (Texas, usa) 5 Stars
November 09, 2009
Very Good History book that is also informative and applicable to the situation in the world today. The third chapter is especially enlightening about the current administrations motives and method of operation.
| |
Absurd thesis supported by false argument by James G. Christenson (Los Altos, CA)  1 Stars
November 03, 2009
"Liberal Fascism" is an example of a genre of right-wing tracts, in which the author takes a radical or absurd idea, assembles a bunch of factoids that seem to support it, and sees how far he/she can go with it. The tone of this one is more intellectual and less vicious than certain others (Coulter, Hannity, Limbaugh, et al.), but the formula is the same. "Liberal fascism" is, of course, an oxymoron; fascism is by definition illiberal or anti-liberal. Fascism is generally characterized by authoritarianism, dictatorial one-party rule, suppression of dissent, extreme nationalism, racism, militarism, aggressive foreign policy, and central economic control (but private capital). Liberalism is generally characterized by democratic government, tolerance and acceptance of minorities, civil liberties, an orientation toward peace and international law, and moderate economic regulation by government. Liberalism is NOT socialism or communism. Goldberg never manages to precisely define what he means by either fascism or liberalism, which is one reason that the result is such a muddle.
Goldberg's entire argument can be demolished in two words: Francisco Franco. If you do not understand why this refutation is so devastating, here is a nutshell sketch. In the early 1930s, a series of centrist to left-wing governments, generally known as the Republic, were elected in Spain. Franco was a general in the Spanish Army and led a military revolt against the Republic in 1936, eventually achieving victory in 1939. Franco ruled Spain as a repressive dictator until his death in 1975. Although he did not call himself a fascist, Franco was clearly ideologically, as well as politically and militarily, allied with Fascism and Nazism. Franco was supported by conservative sectors of Spanish society--e.g., landed aristocrats, industrial interests, the military, and the Church. He was opposed by "Republicans": liberals, labor interests, socialists, and communists. Hitler and Mussolini supported Franco, to the extent of sending tens of thousands of "volunteers" to fight, while liberals and leftists generally opposed him. Interestingly, socialists and Trotskyites were much more enthusiastic supporters of the Republic than was Stalin. Other than Germany and Italy, most western governments adopted a policy of neutrality. "International Brigades" of volunteers were formed to fight for the Republic and many foreign liberals and leftists, including Americans, gave their lives for the cause. The very title of Goldberg's sophomoric exercise is an insult to their memory.
Here is what Goldberg has to say about Franco: he did not deport Spanish Jews the way Hitler wanted him to. That's it. Goldberg's mentor, William F. Buckley, was a big fan of Franco. It is impossible to believe that Goldberg did not notice this elephant in the room of his thesis. The fact that he has next to nothing to say about it is a tacit admission that he has no answer.
| |
SIMILAR PRODUCTS |
| The Forgotten Man: A New History of the Great Depression
by Amity Shlaes (Author)
In The Forgotten Man, Amity Shlaes, one of the nation's most-respected economic commentators, offers a striking reinterpretation of the Great Depression. She traces the mounting agony of the New Dealers and the moving stories of individual citizens who through their brave perseverance helped establish the steadfast character we recognize as American today.
| 
| The 5000 Year Leap: A Miracle That Changed the World
by W. Cleon Skousen (Author)
The 5000 Year Leap: A Miracle That Changed the World. For many years in the United States there has been a gradual drifting away from the Founding Fathers original success formula. This has resulted in some of their most unique contributions for a free and prosperous society becoming lost or misunderstood. Therefore, there has been a need to review the history and development of the making of America in order to recapture the brilliant precepts which made Americans the first free people in...
| 
| Lenin, Stalin, and Hitler: The Age of Social Catastrophe (Vintage)
by Robert Gellately (Author)
A bold new accounting of the great social and political upheavals that enveloped Europe between 1914 and 1945—from the Russian Revolution through the Second World War.
In Lenin, Stalin, and Hitler, acclaimed historian Robert Gellately focuses on the dominant powers of the time, the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany, but also analyzes the catastrophe of those years in an effort to uncover its political and ideological nature. Arguing that the tragedies endured by Europe were inextricably...
| 
| American Progressivism: A Reader
by Ronald J. Pestritto (Editor), William J. Atto (Editor)
This collection of writings by prominent politicians, authors, and activists of the Progressive Era explores Progressivism's role in the development of American political thought. Pestritto and Atto provide insight into each figure's influence on Progressive Era American politics by introducing each entry with the context within which the author of a given selection is writing.
| 
| Glenn Beck's Common Sense: The Case Against an Out-of-Control Government, Inspired by Thomas Paine
by Glenn Beck (Author)
"If you believe it's time to put principles above parties, character above campaign promises, and Common Sense above all -- then I ask you to read this book...."In any era, great Americans inspire us to reach our full potential. They know with conviction what they believe within themselves. They understand that all actions have consequences. And they find commonsense solutions to the nation's problems. One such American, Thomas Paine, was an ordinary man who changed the course of history...
|
|
|
