| View Larger Image | Playtex Gentle Glide Tampons, Deodorant, Multipack of 18 Regular and 18 Super Absorbency Tampons, 36-Count Boxes (Pack of 2) | Health and Beautyby Playtex
| List Price: | $20.29 | | Price: | $19.06 | | You Save: | $1.23 (6%) | | | Available: | Usually ships in 24 hours |
| | Sales Rank: | 33,704rd |
|
FEATURES | - Multi-Pack
- Incredible Comfort and Protection
- Comfortable Plastic Applicators
- Deodorant
|
EDITORIAL REVIEWS |
Product Description
Playtex Gentle Glide Plastic Deodorant Tampons Multi pack (18 regular absorbancy and 18 super absorbancy) Exclusive cross-pad design expands to custom fit your body for incredible comfort and protection with both Regular and Super absorbancy. Pearlescen |
CUSTOMER REVIEWS (Average Customer Rating: 5.0 based on 1 review)
|
Tampax Pearl vs. Playtex Gentle Glide: A Comparison by LawyerMom (USA)  5 Stars
March 30, 2009
I've decided to do a side-by-side comparison of two very similar products: The Playtex Gentle Glide multipack and the Tampax Pearl multipack. Both are offered here on Amazon at roughly the same price per package, though prices will vary with time and/or seller.
Multi-pack: The Pearl offers 3 types of absorbencies in their multipack (8 super, 20 regular, and 8 lights). Meanwhile, the Gentle Glide multipack only offers 2 kinds (regular or super, but offers 18 of each). Each box contains a total of 36 tampons.
Wrapper: Each brand individually wraps their tampons with a plastic wrapper, though the wrapper on the Pearl tampons are slightly softer and make less crinkly sounds when you scrunch them. The biggest difference here, though, is that while the Gentle Glide identifies its brand name and the absorbency level of the tampon on its individual wrapper, the Pearl tampon wrappers have no writing on them and you can only identify which tampon is which absorbency by memorizing the color of the wrapper or checking with the box. This can be a bit of a pain, if you throw one of each type of Pearl tampon into your purse/backpack and forget which absorbency level corresponds to which color.
Applicator: Each brand has a smooth, plastic applicator with a narrow finger grip. While the Pearl applicator appears slightly shorter (4.75 in.) to the Gentle Glide applicator (5 in.), both tampons appear equivalent in circumference/thickness. When I removed the tampon from the applicator, both Super absorbent tampons appear the same size. However, Gentle Glide's regular absorbent tampon appeared to be almost 1/4 inch longer than the Pearl's. (However, this may be a random result, as for the purpose of this experiment, I only opened one tampon at random from each box, of each absorbency.)
Comfort/Composition: The Pearl is made of rayon and/or cotton fiber according to its box. Gentle Glide uses rayon fiber. Both have cotton or polyester strings. Both expand width-wise when absorbing fluid, rather than length-wise like other brands. Both seem equally comfortable. Both are made in the USA.
Absorbency: The FDA regulates tampon absorbencies, so the industry has come up with a standardized measure of labeling. Previously, there was no way of knowing and it was possible the "super" absorbent tampons in one brand was actually less absorbent than "regular" tampons in another brand. The agreed upon labels are as follows: light = less than 6 grams; regular = 6-9 grams; super = 9-12 grams; super plus = 12-15 grams. As you can see, there is still wide range within each range. So, I conducted a little informal experiment/test with a digital kitchen scale (what the heck? I'm bored). I dipped each tampon (again, selected at random) from each box in a cup of water and recorded the amount of water it soaked up when fully absorbed. (Yes, I'm using water--my butcher was fresh out of blood for the day.) Here are the results:
Pearl:
Light - 15g water
Regular - 27g water
Super - 38g water
Gentle Glide:
Regular - 24g water
Super - 40g water
Super Plus (I had this one lying around, so I tested it too) - 55g water
Conclusion:
There's no knock-out here. I would be happy to recommend either of these products. In my experience, they are two of the most comfortable tampons/applicators available on the market and most reliably absorbent.
| |
SIMILAR PRODUCTS |
| Playtex Gentle Glide Tampons, Unscented, Multipack of 18 Regular and 18 Super Absorbency Tampons, 36-Count Boxes (Pack of 2)
by Playtex
Playtex Gentle Glide Plastic Unsented Tampons Multi pack (18 regular absorbancy and 18 super absorbancy) Exclusive cross-pad design expands to custom fit your body for incredible comfort and protection with both Regular and Super absorbancy. Pearlescent
| 
| Playtex Gentle Glide Deodorant Tampons, Soft Plastic Applicator, Super Plus, 36 Count (Pack of 2)
by Playtex
Plastic applicator. The absorbencies of all tampons brands have been standardized. Absorbency: Regular 6-9 g; Absorbency; Super 9-12 g; Super Plus 12-15 g. Made in U.S.A.
| 
| Always Maxi Maximum Protection Pads with Flexi-Wings, 12-Count Bags (Pack of 6)
by Always
Always Maxi Maximum Protection Pads with Flexi-Wings give the most protection available from Always. They are longer front-to-back with wider Wings for 30% more panty coverage than leading regular pads. Always' patented Dri-Weave topsheet is made up of
| ![Kleenex Cottonelle Double Roll, 308 Sheets, 24 Packs (Pack of 2) [Amazon Frustration-Free Packaging]](http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51VPjfwTkBL._SL160_.jpg)
| Kleenex Cottonelle Double Roll, 308 Sheets, 24 Packs (Pack of 2) [Amazon Frustration-Free Packaging]
by Kleenex Cottonelle
Cottonelle Double Roll 24 pack 308 sheets
| 
| Splenda No Calorie Sweetener, Granular, Individual Packets, 700-Count Box
by Splenda
Splenda no calorie sweetener packets are individual portions found in the familiar yellow packets. They are a great way to sweeten beverages and sprinkle on cereal, fresh fruit, and more. Each packet of Splenda no calorie sweetener provides the sweetness of two teaspoons of sugar; 24 packets of Splenda no calorie sweetener provides the sweetness of one cup of sugar. Each packet of Splenda No calorie sweetener has no calories and no carbohydrates per serving. (For cooking and baking, you may...
|
|
|
