Terror warning over laptopsSeptember 11, 2002DUNCAN GRAHAM-ROWE, WASHINGTON DC AIRLINERS could be brought down by terrorists using modified versions of almost any personal electronic equipment, a security expert has warned. He says passengers should be barred from carrying any electronic gadgets onto aircraft until planes are able to detect them. Chet Uber, a technology expert at Security Posture in Omaha, Nebraska, says devices such as radios, tape recorders, CD players, PDAs and laptop computers could easily- and invisibly- be adapted to cause potentially catastrophic interference with an aircraft`s control systems. While it has been known for some time that cellphones and laptops can cause low-level interference, no airline monitors such radio emissions during flight. Instead they rely on passengers turning off their devices during critical periods such as take-off and landing. But Uber told the InfoWar conference in Washington DC that the renewed terrorist threat means we should take seriously the possibility someone might intentionally interfere with the plane`s instruments. Currently, if any device being used by a passenger disturbs the normal operation of a plane, pilots have no monitoring system to tell them whether that problem is due to interference or a malfunction. This leaves aircraft wide open to attack from a device operated by a passenger. For example, Uber says a terrorist with a basic knowledge of electronics could modify the circuitry in many common gadgets to create an electromagnetic weapon. Such a device might interfere with critical flight electronics, such as the guidance system that monitors the aircraft`s "glide slope", which helps the pilot descend smoothly when landing. And at baggage check, even an electronics engineer might not be able to spot that an apparently innocent piece of equipment had been modified. In 1996, the US Federal Aviation Administration funded a feasibility study by MegaWave Corporation of Boylston, Massachusetts, into ways of detecting interfering signals inside aircraft cabins. MegaWave developed a system that scans for a wide range of radio emissions inside the cabin, via sensors mounted above each passenger seat. This would allow the flight crew to quickly pinpoint the source. But after successful demonstrations, MegaWave was told that the FAA was pulling the plug on the research. MegaWave spokesman Marshall Cross believes that it abandoned the project because no commercial air incidents have ever been attributed to interference from electronic equipment in the passenger cabin. "They`ve given commerce a higher priority than safety," says Uber. "This is a clear threat that has not been taken seriously enough." The makers of laptops, in particular, heavily lobbied the FAA not to ban their equipment on planes . But Uber says no electronic gadget should be allowed inside a commercial aircraft unless the airline knows it`s safe. New Scientist | |||||||||||||||||||||
Science Research Departments
Earth Science Alternative Energy | Anthropology and Archaeology | Earthquakes and Volcanoes | Environment and Nature News | Global Warming | High-Energy and Particle Physics | Ozone Hole | Scientists Slow Light | Tsunami Space Science Astronomy and Space News | Black Holes | Chandra X-Ray Observatory | Extrasolar Planets | Hubble Telescope | International Space Station | Jupiter Galileo Mission | Jupiter Cassini Mission Flyby | Mars Exploration | Mars Odyssey 2001 | Mars Global Surveyor | Mars Polar Lander | Mars Climate Orbiter | Mars Pathfinder | Meteors and Asteroids | Mir Space Station | NEAR Asteroid Probe Mission | Pluto Planet Debate | Search for Extraterrestrial Life | Space Shuttle Program | Space Shuttle Mission: STS-102 | Space Weather Life Science Animal News | Biotechnology and Genetics | Brain Research | Human Cloning | Dinosaur and Fossil Discoveries | Endangered Species | Gene Therapy | Genetically Modified Food | Stem Cell Research | Whales and Whaling |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||