 |
|
Secret plans to revive nuclear power
July 03, 2002SPECIAL REPORT- ENERGY POLICY
DEEP within the British government, officials are laying secret plans to push through a major programme of new nuclear power stations. According to internal policy briefings leaked to New Scientist, the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) wants to speed up safety checks of new reactors and is discussing ways to soften up public opposition to nuclear power.
The plan is for Britain to follow the US lead and end the slump suffered by the West`s nuclear power industry since the accident at Chernobyl in the Ukraine 16 years ago. In February, the US Energy Secretary, Spencer Abraham, announced plans to build a new nuclear power plant by 2010, aided by a "more efficient, effective and predictable" system of safety licensing.
The revelation that the DTI is preparing to do something similar comes just months after the British government`s Performance and Innovation Unit (PIU) published a comprehensive review of energy policy. This recommended that nuclear power should be retained only if expanding renewable energy sources and improving energy efficiency don`t work (New Scientist, 15 December 2001, p 5).
But it`s now clear from the leaked documents that the DTI has always been determined to pave the way for nuclear development. It is working hard behind the scenes to make sure that a White Paper on energy policy due out next year will reflect its ambitions.
Nuclear power in Britain has lost its momentum. The last nuclear station to be built, at Sizewell in Suffolk, was completed in 1995 after 15 years of argument. None has been ordered since because gas-fired plants are cheaper, and because of public concern over reactor safety and radioactive waste.
The DTI has several plans to change that. The suggestion likely to provoke most alarm is for the regulations on reactor safety to be overhauled so that new designs can be licensed more quickly and cheaply. There are at least three types of reactor under consideration, in all of which the state-owned company British Nuclear Fuels (BNFL) has a stake.
Two - the AP1000 and its smaller cousin, the AP600 - are large advanced light water reactors being developed by Westinghouse, which is now owned by BNFL (see Table). Others include a much smaller high temperature reactor, known as the Pebble Bed Modular Reactor, which is under development in South Africa, and a Canadian heavy water reactor called Candu 6.
The energy policy briefing to British ministers argues that power companies will not invest in building any of these reactors if it takes years to win safety approval. "In a competitive electricity market this adds significantly to both capital risk and economic cost," it says.
So the DTI is proposing to "speed approval for operation in the UK". This will involve "simplifying licensing requirements" and collaborating with the US on "generic approvals": in other words, fast-tracking designs that have already been given the go-ahead in the US.
The briefing urges the Nuclear Installations Inspectorate, which regulates the nuclear industry, to learn from the US by changing its "style" and improving its "responsiveness and targeting" in order to meet the needs of power companies. Although the briefing is dated June 2001, insiders say it still represents the view of the DTI.
The DTI is also worried that international moves to tighten the limits on radioactive discharges into the sea could prevent new nuclear plants from being approved. "The limits- and pressure to further reduce them- will be carefully monitored to ensure that the future position is not unintentionally compromised," it promises.
As well as fast-tracking safety regulation, the DTI is also proposing ways that nuclear plants could win planning permission more easily. "Simplification of the planning system could also be an issue, together with ways of compensating local communities for the perceived disbenefits of new nuclear build. Potential sensitivities could be eased to some extent by utilising space on existing nuclear sites."
The leaked briefing lists eight such sites in England and Wales where new stations could be built.
On the question of the high cost of nuclear electricity, the briefing argues that companies that build new nuclear stations deserve tax breaks, on the grounds that they don`t emit the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide. "There are prospects for new build to be economic," it concludes. The clear implication of the DTI`s analysis is that, without the planning and regulatory reforms and the carbon tax breaks, nuclear power would flounder.
"No development," says another internal document, "is likely in the UK without a signal from government that they would be willing to consider new nuclear power stations."
The only remaining problem is public opinion. But the DTI believes it can win people round by stressing that without new nuclear stations there could be power blackouts like those in California two years ago. "Public acceptance may not be the intractable problem it is perceived as being, particularly if the alternatives are considered less palatable," the briefing observes.
And when it comes to disposing of the radioactive waste that any new reactors will inevitably produce, people just need to realise that the amounts aren`t as big as they think, the leaked briefing explains. "The difficulty in advocating new build is one of perception," not helped by "an increasingly vociferous and influential environmental lobby."
Outside experts regard the DTI`s stance as predictable but flawed. Gordon MacKerron, a leading economist involved in preparing the PIU energy report, points out that in Britain a nuclear power station that could compete economically with other forms of energy has never been built. "Competitive nuclear power is still at best an untested proposition," he says.
The DTI denies it has a hidden agenda on nuclear power. "We`ve got an open mind on this," insists a spokesman. "We are working towards a diverse and sustainable energy mix." But Stewart Boyle, a commentator for Platt`s Energy Newsletters, is convinced the department is hoping for a nuclear comeback. "The public won`t like it and it could prove to be a colossal political mistake," he says.
The final decision, of course, rests with the Cabinet, in which ministers are split on nuclear power. But as one of the most influential departments in Whitehall, the DTI is quietly doing everything it can to make sure it gets its way.
Author: Rob Edwards
New Scientist
The revelation that the DTI is preparing to do something similar comes just months after the British government`s Performance and Innovation Unit (PIU) published a comprehensive review of energy policy. This recommended that nuclear power should be retained only if expanding renewable energy sources and improving energy efficiency don`t work (New Scientist, 15 December 2001, p 5).
But it`s now clear from the leaked documents that the DTI has always been determined to pave the way for nuclear development. It is working hard behind the scenes to make sure that a White Paper on energy policy due out next year will reflect its ambitions.
Nuclear power in Britain has lost its momentum. The last nuclear station to be built, at Sizewell in Suffolk, was completed in 1995 after 15 years of argument. None has been ordered since because gas-fired plants are cheaper, and because of public concern over reactor safety and radioactive waste.
The DTI has several plans to change that. The suggestion likely to provoke most alarm is for the regulations on reactor safety to be overhauled so that new designs can be licensed more quickly and cheaply. There are at least three types of reactor under consideration, in all of which the state-owned company British Nuclear Fuels (BNFL) has a stake.
Two - the AP1000 and its smaller cousin, the AP600 - are large advanced light water reactors being developed by Westinghouse, which is now owned by BNFL (see Table). Others include a much smaller high temperature reactor, known as the Pebble Bed Modular Reactor, which is under development in South Africa, and a Canadian heavy water reactor called Candu 6.
The energy policy briefing to British ministers argues that power companies will not invest in building any of these reactors if it takes years to win safety approval. "In a competitive electricity market this adds significantly to both capital risk and economic cost," it says.
So the DTI is proposing to "speed approval for operation in the UK". This will involve "simplifying licensing requirements" and collaborating with the US on "generic approvals": in other words, fast-tracking designs that have already been given the go-ahead in the US.
The briefing urges the Nuclear Installations Inspectorate, which regulates the nuclear industry, to learn from the US by changing its "style" and improving its "responsiveness and targeting" in order to meet the needs of power companies. Although the briefing is dated June 2001, insiders say it still represents the view of the DTI.
The DTI is also worried that international moves to tighten the limits on radioactive discharges into the sea could prevent new nuclear plants from being approved. "The limits- and pressure to further reduce them- will be carefully monitored to ensure that the future position is not unintentionally compromised," it promises.
As well as fast-tracking safety regulation, the DTI is also proposing ways that nuclear plants could win planning permission more easily. "Simplification of the planning system could also be an issue, together with ways of compensating local communities for the perceived disbenefits of new nuclear build. Potential sensitivities could be eased to some extent by utilising space on existing nuclear sites."
The leaked briefing lists eight such sites in England and Wales where new stations could be built.
On the question of the high cost of nuclear electricity, the briefing argues that companies that build new nuclear stations deserve tax breaks, on the grounds that they don`t emit the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide. "There are prospects for new build to be economic," it concludes. The clear implication of the DTI`s analysis is that, without the planning and regulatory reforms and the carbon tax breaks, nuclear power would flounder.
"No development," says another internal document, "is likely in the UK without a signal from government that they would be willing to consider new nuclear power stations."
The only remaining problem is public opinion. But the DTI believes it can win people round by stressing that without new nuclear stations there could be power blackouts like those in California two years ago. "Public acceptance may not be the intractable problem it is perceived as being, particularly if the alternatives are considered less palatable," the briefing observes.
And when it comes to disposing of the radioactive waste that any new reactors will inevitably produce, people just need to realise that the amounts aren`t as big as they think, the leaked briefing explains. "The difficulty in advocating new build is one of perception," not helped by "an increasingly vociferous and influential environmental lobby."
Outside experts regard the DTI`s stance as predictable but flawed. Gordon MacKerron, a leading economist involved in preparing the PIU energy report, points out that in Britain a nuclear power station that could compete economically with other forms of energy has never been built. "Competitive nuclear power is still at best an untested proposition," he says.
The DTI denies it has a hidden agenda on nuclear power. "We`ve got an open mind on this," insists a spokesman. "We are working towards a diverse and sustainable energy mix." But Stewart Boyle, a commentator for Platt`s Energy Newsletters, is convinced the department is hoping for a nuclear comeback. "The public won`t like it and it could prove to be a colossal political mistake," he says.
The final decision, of course, rests with the Cabinet, in which ministers are split on nuclear power. But as one of the most influential departments in Whitehall, the DTI is quietly doing everything it can to make sure it gets its way.
Author: Rob Edwards
New Scientist
Nuclear Current Events and Nuclear News RSSScientists watch as peptides control crystal growth with 'switches, throttles and brakes'
By producing some of the highest resolution images of peptides attaching to mineral surfaces, scientists have a deeper understanding how biomolecules manipulate the growth crystals. This research may lead to a new treatment for kidney stones using biomolecules.
Genetic analysis helps dissect molecular basis of cardiovascular disease
Using highly precise measurements of plasma lipoprotein concentrations determined by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR), researchers led by Daniel Chasman at Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School in Boston, MA, the Framingham Heart Study in Framingham, and the PROCARDIS consortium in Stockholm, Sweden and Oxford, England performed genetic association analysis across the whole genome among 17,296 women of European ancestry from the Women's Genome Health Study.
Is global warming unstoppable?
In a provocative new study, a University of Utah scientist argues that rising carbon dioxide emissions - the major cause of global warming - cannot be stabilized unless the world's economy collapses or society builds the equivalent of one new nuclear power plant each day.
Nuclear weapons: Predicting the unthinkable
If a nuclear weapon were detonated in a metropolitan area, how large would the affected area be? Where should first responders first go? According to physicist Fernando Grinstein, we have some initial understanding to address these questions, but fundamental issues remain unresolved.
An atomic-level look at an HIV accomplice
Since the discovery in 2007 that a component of human semen called SEVI boosts infectivity of the virus that causes AIDS, researchers have been trying to learn more about SEVI and how it works, in hopes of thwarting its infection-promoting activity.
Proton's party pals may alter its internal structure
A recent experiment at the Department of Energy's Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility has found that a proton's nearest neighbors in the nucleus of the atom may modify the proton's internal structure.
Chromosomes dance and pair up on the nuclear membrane
Meiosis - the pairing and recombination of chromosomes, followed by segregation of half to each egg or sperm cell - is a major crossroads in all organisms reproducing sexually.
Nanotech in Space: Rensselaer Experiment To Weather the Trials of Orbit
Novel nanomaterials developed at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute are scheduled to blast off into orbit on November 16 aboard Space Shuttle Atlantis.
The bizarre lives of bone-eating worms
The females of the recently discovered Osedax marine worms feast on submerged bones via a complex relationship with symbiotic bacteria, and they are turning out to be far more diverse and widespread than scientists expected.
SNM applauds House action to build medical isotopes reactor in the US
SNM applauds the U.S. House of Representatives for its passage of H.R. 3276-the American Medical Isotopes Production Act of 2009.
More Nuclear Current Events and Nuclear News Articles
 |
History of Nuclear Weapons - The Ultimate Weapons (2-DVD Set) Directed By: A2ZCDS.com The Ultimate Weapons DVD set from A2ZCDS is both disturbing and fascinating at the same time. Its historical significance can not be overrated – nor can the quality of these incredibly preserved vintage films from the dawn of the nuclear era. Over the course of the two DVDs you get a full picture of the development of the first nuclear weapons – that would spearhead the end of World War II – up through advanced nuclear testing in the late 1950s. If you are looking for films of nuclear bombs exploding, you will not be disappointed. You see the effects of the bomb on houses constructed at test sites, and also learn how the government planned to deal with the psychological effects of nuclear weapons. The Bikini Atoll test films are included and there is some exciting footage of... |
 |
The Nuclear Express: A Political History of the Bomb and Its Proliferation by Thomas C. Reed (Author), Danny B. Stillman (Author) This is a political history of nuclear weapons from the discovery of fission in 1938 to the nuclear train wreck that seems to loom in our future. It is an account of where those weapons came from, how the technology surprisingly and covertly spread, who is likely to acquire those weapons next and most importantly why.
The authors’ examination of post-Cold War national and geopolitical issues regarding nuclear proliferation and the effects of Chinese sponsorship of the Pakistani program is eye opening. The reckless “nuclear weapons programs for sale” exporting of technology by Pakistan is truly chilling as is the on again off... |
 |
3M Performance Plus 8979N Nuclear Grade 48-Millimeter-by-54.8-Meter Duct Tape, Slate Blue by 3M 8979N Nuclear Grade is designed for both permanent and temporary applications both indoors and outdoors. 8979 provides clean removal with little or no adhesive residue from most opaque surfaces up to 6 months after application. It offers sunlight/UV r |
 |
Day One Starring: Brian Dennehy, Alan Scarfe, John Pielmeier, Ken Pogue, David Strathairn Directed By: Joseph Sargent This Emmy® winning, historically accurate drama tells the complex and moving story of the Manhattan Project. Racing against the Nazi war machine and enduring intense military and political pressure, Allied scientists wrestle with the challenge of creating the ultimate weapon. Leading the superb cast are Michael Tucker (L.A. Law) as Hungarian physicist Leo Szilard, David Strathairn (Good Night, and Good Luck.) as mission chief J. Robert Oppenheimer, Brian Dennehy (Death of a Salesman) as General Leslie Groves, and David Ogden Stiers (MASH) as FDR. Also featuring Hal Holbrook (Mark Twain Tonight!), Hume Cronyn (12 Angry Men), and Tony Shalhoub (Monk). Before the bomb can be perfected, Hitler's death and Germany's surrender remove one enemy from the equation. But Japan remains. Day... |
 |
Nuclear Energy in the 21st Century: World Nuclear University Press by Ian Hore-Lacy (Author) The onset of the 21st century has coincided with mounting scientific evidence of the severe environmental impact of global energy consumption. In response, governments and environmentalists on every continent have begun to re-evaluate the benefits of nuclear power as a clean, non-emitting energy resource. Today nuclear power plants operate in some 30 countries, and nuclear energy has become a safe and reliable source of one-sixth of the world's electricity. This base has the potential to be expanded widely as part of a worldwide clean-energy revolution. Nuclear Energy in the 21st Century is an authoritative resource for educators, students, policy-makers and interested lay-people. This balanced and accessible text provides: * An inroad into nuclear science for the... |
 |
Trinity & Beyond - The Atomic Bomb Movie Starring: William Shatner, Edward Teller, Frank H. Shelton, Randall William Cook, Hubert H. Humphrey Directed By: Peter Kuran Trinity & Beyond… The Atomic Bomb Movieis the top secret, strange and visually compelling history of the design, production and testing of Atomic Hydrogen bombs. In this special 60th Anniversary Diamond Edition, renowned special effects filmmaker Peter Kuran (Star Wars, Star Trek II & V, Robocop) offers up amazing film footage chronicling the top secret, strange and visually compelling history of the design, production and testing of Atomic Hydrogen bombs by the United States. With the development and use of award-winning new film restoration systems, Kuran has perfectly preserved these haunting images for generations to come. Narrated by William Shatner (Boston Legal, Star Trek), Trinity & Beyond features extremely rare film segments from top secret government archives and... |
 |
Power to Save the World: The Truth About Nuclear Energy (Vintage) by Gwyneth Cravens (Author), Richard Rhodes (Introduction) An informed look at the myths and fears surrounding nuclear energy, and a practical, politically realistic solution to global warming and our energy needs. Faced by the world's oil shortages and curious about alternative energy sources, Gwyneth Cravens skeptically sets out to find the truth about nuclear energy. Her conclusion: it is a totally viable and practical solution to global warming. In the end, we see that if we are to care for subsequent generations, embracing nuclear energy is an ethical imperative. |
 |
Nuclear War Card Game by Flying Buffalo A humorous card game with a tongue-in-cheek view of international diplomacy, propaganda, and finally: holocaust! Two to six players engage in touchy negotiations until a warmonger pushes the button! This hilarious card game is easy to learn and fast to play. But watch out: if everyone is wiped out -- nobody wins! |
 |
Defcon: Strategic Nuclear War by Encore It's the End Of the World as You Know It! Inspired by the 1983 cult hit, War Games, Defcon puts you right in the middle of the Cold War era. Your success and our ultimate survival are on the line. Can you dominate or will you crumble under the pressure and paranoia? Compete as 1 of 6 superpowers embroiled in the largest military conflict imaginable! The only game that allows players to rain nuclear death on the enemy and rack up kill counts in the 10s of MILLIONS! |
 |
Nuclear Weapons: What You Need to Know by Jeremy Bernstein (Author) Nuclear Weapons is a history of nuclear weapons. From their initial theoretical development at the start of the twentieth century to the recent tests in North Korea, the author seeks to, at each point in the narrative, describe the basic science of nuclear weaponry. At the same time, he offers accounts and anecdotes of the personalities involved, many of whom he has known firsthand. Dr. Bernstein writes in response to what he sees as a widespread misunderstanding throughout the media of the basic workings and potential impact of nuclear weaponry. |
| © 2009 BrightSurf.com |