 |
|
Very few mothers reject childhood immunisation
June 02, 2006Differences in risk factors for partial and no immunisation in the first year of life: Prospective cohort study; BMJ Volume 332, pp 1312-13
The mothers of children who are unimmunised differ from those who are partially immunised in a number of ways, finds a study in this week's BMJ.
This is the first large scale study of its kind in the UK, and suggests that different approaches are needed to maximise uptake of immunisation in these groups.
Researchers from the Institute of Child Health analysed data for 18,488 infants born between September 2000 and January 2002 in the UK. The sample was stratified by UK country and electoral wards to adequately represent infants from ethnic minority groups and disadvantaged backgrounds.
Mothers were interviewed when the infants were about 9 months old. They were shown a card listing the primary vaccines, given at 2, 3, and 4 months of age, and asked if the infants had received three doses of all listed vaccines.
Overall, 3.3% of infants were partially immunised and 1.1% were unimmunised. These rates were highest in England (3.6% and 1.3% respectively).
Partially immunised infants were more likely to come from an ethnic minority group, a disadvantaged background, and a large family. They were also more likely to have a teenaged or lone parent, a mother who smoked during pregnancy, and have been admitted to hospital at least once.
In contrast, unimmunised infants were more likely to have older (40 years or above) and more highly qualified mothers, or mothers of black Caribbean ethnicity.
Mothers cited medical factors relating to their child or family as the predominant reason for partial immunisation. Mothers' beliefs or attitudes towards immunisation were the main reason cited for no immunisation.
These findings indicate that mothers of unimmunised and partially immunised infants differ in terms of age and education, say the authors. "Our study suggests that different interventions are needed to promote uptake of immunisation among older and more highly qualified mothers who reject primary immunisations," they conclude.
BMJ-British Medical Journal
Mothers were interviewed when the infants were about 9 months old. They were shown a card listing the primary vaccines, given at 2, 3, and 4 months of age, and asked if the infants had received three doses of all listed vaccines.
Overall, 3.3% of infants were partially immunised and 1.1% were unimmunised. These rates were highest in England (3.6% and 1.3% respectively).
Partially immunised infants were more likely to come from an ethnic minority group, a disadvantaged background, and a large family. They were also more likely to have a teenaged or lone parent, a mother who smoked during pregnancy, and have been admitted to hospital at least once.
In contrast, unimmunised infants were more likely to have older (40 years or above) and more highly qualified mothers, or mothers of black Caribbean ethnicity.
Mothers cited medical factors relating to their child or family as the predominant reason for partial immunisation. Mothers' beliefs or attitudes towards immunisation were the main reason cited for no immunisation.
These findings indicate that mothers of unimmunised and partially immunised infants differ in terms of age and education, say the authors. "Our study suggests that different interventions are needed to promote uptake of immunisation among older and more highly qualified mothers who reject primary immunisations," they conclude.
BMJ-British Medical Journal
The latest research on allergies: Specific immunotherapy can help
he German Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care has assessed recent evidence on allergies. It found that the once controversial immune therapy against allergy symptoms can definitely help many people with allergies.
Most UK citizens susceptible to hepatitis B infection
The failure of the UK to introduce universal hepatitis B immunisation means that most UK citizens are susceptible to infection, warns an infectious diseases expert in this week's BMJ.
Violent patients most likely to be removed from GPs' lists
Violent, threatening or abusive behaviour by patients is the most common reason for removing a patient from their lists, report general practitioners in this week's BMJ. In April 2000, researchers at the University of Sheffield surveyed 1,000 general practitioners in England and Wales about the current scale of, and reasons for, removal of patients from their lists (other than the patient living outside the practice area). A total of 748 questionnaires were returned. They found that 40% of practices had removed one or more patients in the previous six months. Violent, threatening, or abusive behaviour was given as a primary reason in 176 (59%) of these cases and as a contributory reason in
More Childhood Immunisation Current Events and Childhood Immunisation News Articles
|
CHILDHOOD IMMUNISATION: The facts by HELEN BEDFORD (Author), DAVID ELLIMAN (Author) | |
|
Childhood Immunisation in England by Helen Bedford (Author), David Elliman (Author) | |
|
CHILDHOOD IMMUNISATION by Unknown (Author) | |
|
Childhood Immunisation in England: Issues from the Research by Marycke Veltman (Author), David Salisbury (Author) | |
|
A Guide to Childhood Immunisations from 3 Years 4 Months of Age by NHS Health Scotland (Author) | |
|
NEW GUIDE TO CHILDHOOD IMMUNISATION by HPE (Author) | |
|
Childhood Immunisation: Factsheets for Health Professionals by Health Education Authority (Publisher) | |
|
A Guide to Childhood Immunisations by Health Education Authority (Publisher) | |
|
Report on childhood immunisation by Ireland (Author) | |
|
A Guide to Childhood Immunisations: Translations Pack by Health Education Authority (Publisher) |
| © 2009 BrightSurf.com |