 |
|
Symposium marks 30th anniversary of discovery of third domain of life
October 17, 2007CHAMPAIGN, Ill. - Thirty years ago this month, researchers at the University of Illinois published a discovery that challenged basic assumptions about the broadest classifications of life. Their discovery - which was based on an analysis of ribosomal RNA, an ancient molecule essential to the replication of all cells - opened up a new field of study, and established a first draft of the evolutionary "tree of life."
To mark the anniversary of this discovery, the university is holding a symposium Nov. 3-4 (Saturday-Sunday), with a public lecture at the Spurlock Museum on the evening of Nov. 2. "Hidden Before Our Eyes: 30 Years of Molecular Phylogeny, Archaea and Evolution" will detail the exacting work that led to the discovery of a "third domain" of life, the microbes now known as the archaea. The event will revisit the program of research that led to the discovery, explore its impact on the study of evolution, and describe the way in which genetic analysis continues to revolutionize biology, in particular microbial ecology.
In 1977, microbiology professor Carl Woese led the team that identified the archaea as a unique domain of life, distinct from bacteria and other organisms. Prior to this finding, generations of evolutionary biologists and microbiologists believed that the microbes now called archaea were simply another taxon among bacteria. They had divided all living organisms into two broad superkingdoms, or domains: the "prokaryotes," which included both the true bacteria and archaea; and "eukaryotes," including all animals, plants, fungi and protists (a diverse group that includes protozoans, algae, slime molds and other organisms). Some prominent biologists still hold to this classification scheme.
Woese had set out to map the evolutionary history of life by comparing RNA sequences of a molecular sequence common to all living cells: the ribosome, which manufactures a cell's proteins.
Each group of organisms contains sets of genetic sequences in their ribosomal RNA that are distinctive. These genetic "signatures" differentiate the groups. Woese's analysis of a variety of organisms' genetic signatures told a story that was different from the conventional wisdom, however.
This surprising discovery came when the researchers looked at the ribosomal RNA (rRNA) of a group of methane-generating microbes that had been classified as bacteria. Illinois microbiology professor Ralph Wolfe, an expert on these "methanogens," was a member of Woese's team, along with postdoctoral researcher George Fox, graduate student William Balch and lab technician Linda Magrum.
"Of all the numerous suggestions we had gotten for organisms to study, the one I solicited from my colleague, Ralph Wolfe, turned out to be the most important," Woese wrote in an account of the discovery. "Ralph was in the process of working out the biochemistry of methanogenesis, which made it natural for him to suggest we characterize the methanogens."
Wolfe was one of only a handful of researchers studying methanogens in the mid-1970s. These organisms were notoriously difficult to grow in culture because they could survive only in an oxygen-free atmosphere that was rich in hydrogen and carbon dioxide. Balch, a graduate student in Wolfe's lab, had found a way to create a sealed and pressurized atmosphere inside a test tube that would support these organisms, however. Using this technique, a methanogen now called M. bryantii, was grown in sufficient quantities for study.
Woese had already found a collection of rRNA sequences that were specific to bacteria, and another set of sequences unique to plants, animals and other eukarya. When he sequenced the ribosomal RNA of Wolfe's methanogen, however, he found that it was strikingly different from that of eukarya and bacteria. Although it shared some universal sequences with the other organisms, it also carried its own unique set of sequences that did not fit with either group. It was "neither fish nor fowl," Woese said.
The scientists were astonished, and quickly turned their attention to other methanogens. The genetic pattern held: The rRNA signatures of the methanogens were distinct from those of eukaryotes and bacteria. Woese concluded that the methanogens were not bacteria.
Wolfe recalled, "When Carl said they weren't bacteria, I said: 'Of course they are bacteria! They look like bacteria! They have this prokaryotic morphology and cell structure.' "
But when Wolfe saw how the sequence data fell into discrete groups, with all the methanogens in a category of their own, "I became a believer," he said.
Their findings were published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in October 1977. The paper's three-sentence abstract stated simply that "the methanogens constitute a distinct phylogenetic group- only distantly related to bacteria."
A second PNAS paper, published the following month by Woese and Fox, outlined the evidence that there were three - rather than two - superkingdoms, or domains, of life.
"There was general amazement and feeling that something great had been discovered among the physical scientists," Woese said.
Many microbiologists and other life scientists were unwilling to accept the new classification scheme, however. They continued to see the archaea as a highly differentiated offshoot of the bacterial line.
In 2003, Woese won the $500,000 Crafoord Prize in Biosciences for his discovery of this "third domain of life." The prize, given by the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, marks accomplishments in scientific fields not covered by the Nobel Prizes in sciences, which the academy also selects.
Controversy over the work continued, however. Some scientists described the 1977 announcement of a third domain as an achievement comparable to that of the discovery of a new continent. Others discounted the idea as a "fantastic" hypothesis based on a limited and unreliable pool of data. To this day, many textbooks, dictionaries and other science reference materials include the "classical" and the Woese classification schemes.
Now 79, Woese continues his work as a member of the "Biocomplexity" theme at the Institute for Genomic Biology. He works with collaborators in physics, chemistry, geology and microbiology in a continuing exploration of the genomic complexity of biological systems. He worries about what he sees as a general lack of interest in evolution among microbiologists and other life scientists. And he hopes that a new generation of scientists will make full use of the genomic tools that he believes could revolutionize the study of the origins and evolution of life.
Wolfe, 86, an emeritus professor of microbiology, continues his interest in the physiology and biochemistry of the methanoarchaea.
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Woese had set out to map the evolutionary history of life by comparing RNA sequences of a molecular sequence common to all living cells: the ribosome, which manufactures a cell's proteins.
Each group of organisms contains sets of genetic sequences in their ribosomal RNA that are distinctive. These genetic "signatures" differentiate the groups. Woese's analysis of a variety of organisms' genetic signatures told a story that was different from the conventional wisdom, however.
This surprising discovery came when the researchers looked at the ribosomal RNA (rRNA) of a group of methane-generating microbes that had been classified as bacteria. Illinois microbiology professor Ralph Wolfe, an expert on these "methanogens," was a member of Woese's team, along with postdoctoral researcher George Fox, graduate student William Balch and lab technician Linda Magrum.
"Of all the numerous suggestions we had gotten for organisms to study, the one I solicited from my colleague, Ralph Wolfe, turned out to be the most important," Woese wrote in an account of the discovery. "Ralph was in the process of working out the biochemistry of methanogenesis, which made it natural for him to suggest we characterize the methanogens."
Wolfe was one of only a handful of researchers studying methanogens in the mid-1970s. These organisms were notoriously difficult to grow in culture because they could survive only in an oxygen-free atmosphere that was rich in hydrogen and carbon dioxide. Balch, a graduate student in Wolfe's lab, had found a way to create a sealed and pressurized atmosphere inside a test tube that would support these organisms, however. Using this technique, a methanogen now called M. bryantii, was grown in sufficient quantities for study.
Woese had already found a collection of rRNA sequences that were specific to bacteria, and another set of sequences unique to plants, animals and other eukarya. When he sequenced the ribosomal RNA of Wolfe's methanogen, however, he found that it was strikingly different from that of eukarya and bacteria. Although it shared some universal sequences with the other organisms, it also carried its own unique set of sequences that did not fit with either group. It was "neither fish nor fowl," Woese said.
The scientists were astonished, and quickly turned their attention to other methanogens. The genetic pattern held: The rRNA signatures of the methanogens were distinct from those of eukaryotes and bacteria. Woese concluded that the methanogens were not bacteria.
Wolfe recalled, "When Carl said they weren't bacteria, I said: 'Of course they are bacteria! They look like bacteria! They have this prokaryotic morphology and cell structure.' "
But when Wolfe saw how the sequence data fell into discrete groups, with all the methanogens in a category of their own, "I became a believer," he said.
Their findings were published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in October 1977. The paper's three-sentence abstract stated simply that "the methanogens constitute a distinct phylogenetic group- only distantly related to bacteria."
A second PNAS paper, published the following month by Woese and Fox, outlined the evidence that there were three - rather than two - superkingdoms, or domains, of life.
"There was general amazement and feeling that something great had been discovered among the physical scientists," Woese said.
Many microbiologists and other life scientists were unwilling to accept the new classification scheme, however. They continued to see the archaea as a highly differentiated offshoot of the bacterial line.
In 2003, Woese won the $500,000 Crafoord Prize in Biosciences for his discovery of this "third domain of life." The prize, given by the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, marks accomplishments in scientific fields not covered by the Nobel Prizes in sciences, which the academy also selects.
Controversy over the work continued, however. Some scientists described the 1977 announcement of a third domain as an achievement comparable to that of the discovery of a new continent. Others discounted the idea as a "fantastic" hypothesis based on a limited and unreliable pool of data. To this day, many textbooks, dictionaries and other science reference materials include the "classical" and the Woese classification schemes.
Now 79, Woese continues his work as a member of the "Biocomplexity" theme at the Institute for Genomic Biology. He works with collaborators in physics, chemistry, geology and microbiology in a continuing exploration of the genomic complexity of biological systems. He worries about what he sees as a general lack of interest in evolution among microbiologists and other life scientists. And he hopes that a new generation of scientists will make full use of the genomic tools that he believes could revolutionize the study of the origins and evolution of life.
Wolfe, 86, an emeritus professor of microbiology, continues his interest in the physiology and biochemistry of the methanoarchaea.
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Archaea Current Events and Archaea News RSSCaltech researchers reveal unexpected sources of nitrogen fixation
Researchers at the California Institute of Technology (Caltech) have identified an unexpected metabolic ability within a symbiotic community of microorganisms that may help solve a lingering mystery about the world's nitrogen-cycling budget.
Surprising new insights into the repair strategies of DNA
A microscopic single-celled organism, adapted to survive in some of the harshest environments on earth, could help scientists gain a better understanding of how cancer cells behave.
Methane-eating microbes can use iron and manganese oxides to 'breathe'
Iron and manganese compounds, in addition to sulfate, may play an important role in converting methane to carbon dioxide and eventually carbonates in the Earth's oceans, according to a team of researchers looking at anaerobic sediments.
Exploring Standards to Advance Microbial Genomics
Microbes contribute to manifold human endeavors ranging from bioenergy to agriculture to medicine. Moreover, they make the Earth's biogeochemical cycles go round, a prerequisite for all life on the planet.
Rampant helper syndrome
The Archaea are single-celled organisms and a domain unto themselves, quite apart from the so called eukaryotes, being bacteria and higher organisms.
Nickel isotope may be methane producing microbe biomarker
Nickel, an important trace nutrient for the single cell organisms that produce methane, may be a useful isotopic marker to pinpoint the past origins of these methanogenic microbes, according to Penn State and University of Bristol, UK, researchers.
Geographic isolation drives the evolution of a hot springs microbe
Sulfolobus islandicus, a microbe that can live in boiling acid, is offering up its secrets to researchers hardy enough to capture it from the volcanic hot springs where it thrives.
Microbes turn electricity directly to methane without hydrogen generation
A tiny microbe can take electricity and directly convert carbon dioxide and water to methane, producing a portable energy source with a potentially neutral carbon footprint, according to a team of Penn State engineers.
What's Killing the Coral Reefs?
The answer to what's killing the world's coral reefs may be found in a tiny chip that fits in the palm of your hand.
Improved method for comparing genomes as well as written text
Taking a hint from the text comparison methods used to detect plagiarism in books, college papers and computer programs, University of California, Berkeley, researchers have developed an improved method for comparing whole genome sequences.
More Archaea Current Events and Archaea News Articles
 |
Archaea: Evolution, Physiology, and Molecular Biology by Roger A. Garrett (Editor), Hans-Peter Klenk (Editor) Introduced by Crafoord Prize winner Carl Woese, this volume combines reviews of the major developments in archaeal research over the past 10-15 years with more specialized articles dealing with important recent breakthroughs. Drawing on major themes presented at the June 2005 meeting held in Munich to honor the archaea pioneers Wolfram Zillig and Karl O. Stetter, the book provides a thorough survey of the field from its controversial beginnings to its ongoing expansion to include aspects of eukaryotic biology. The editors have assembled articles from the premier researchers in this rapidly burgeoning field, including an account by Carl Woese of his original discovery of the Archaea (until 1990 termed archaebacteria) and the initially mixed reactions of the scientific... |
 |
The Surprising Archaea: Discovering Another Domain of Life by John L. Howland (Author) Although they comprise one of the three fundamental branches of life, the Archaea were only recognized as a group about twenty years ago. This recognition was based on similarities between their RNA sequences, similarities all the more striking because of the diversity of archaeal lifestyles. They include microorganisms that live in boiling water, within the guts of animals, or in concentration brines. It is also evident that the Archaea diverged early in the history of life, and are of great evolutionary interest as a result. This book tells their emerging story, from their toughness in the face of forbidding environments to their unique place in evolution and in the world ecosystem. |
 |
Archaea by Dan Joseph Dan Joseph (Composer), The Dan Joseph Enseble (Composer) Mutable Music is pleased to announce the debut release by composer and hammer dulcimer virtuoso Dan Joseph. Entitled Archaea, the recording consists of three recent extended chamber works performed by The Dan Joseph Ensemble: Tom Chiu (violin), Michael Lowenstern (clarinet), Danny Tunick (percussion), Marija Ilic (harpsichord), Loren Dempster (cello) and the composer on hammer dulcimer. Influenced most directly by the first generation minimalists, Joseph's works bring a welcome new voice to the idiom with his unique sense of timbre, intricate rhythms and unexpected formal turns. Equal parts East coast and West coast, Appalachian and Balkan, Rock and Baroque, his style is characterized by its immediate beauty, positive spirit and exhilarating drive. Dan Joseph (b. 1966) is a free-lance... |
 |
Eleanor Rigby Archæa Strings (Primary Contributor) |
 |
The Domains of Life, Program 1: Life's Three Great Branches: Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya Also With: BioMEDIA Associates (Producer) Combining superb imaging of primitive cell types with state-of-the-art animation, this two-program series describes the current prevailing view of evolutionary events that shaped life on planet Earth. Program 1 ISBN: 1930527284 Program 2 ISBN: 1930527292 |
 |
Archaea: Molecular and Cellular Biology b |
|
Archaea by Mem | |
 |
Archaea: New Models for Prokaryotic Biology by Paul Blum (Editor) |
|
|
Texas Tarantella Archæa Strings (Primary Contributor) |
 |
The Third Domain by Tim Friend (Author) "The Third Domain" is the untold story of how the discovery of a new form of life - first ridiculed, then ignored for the past thirty years by mainstream scientists - is revolutionizing science, industry, and even our search for extraterrestrial life. Classification is a serious issue for science: if you don't know what you're looking at, how can you interpret what you see? Starting with Carolus Linnaeus in the 17th century, scientists have long struggled to order and categorize the many forms of life on Earth. But by the early 20th century the tree of life seemed to have stabilized, with two main domains of life at its roots: single-celled and multi-celled organisms. All creatures fit into one of these two groups. Or so we thought. But in 1977, a lone scientist named Carl Woese... |
| © 2009 BrightSurf.com |