 |
|
New mammography technology improves cancer detection
November 29, 2007A new radiological diagnostic tool called stereo mammography allows clinicians to detect more lesions and could significantly reduce the number of women who are recalled for additional tests following routine screening mammography.
The findings from a clinical trial underway at Emory University were presented today at the annual meeting of the Radiological Society of North America held in Chicago.
In the study, stereoscopic digital mammography reduced false-positive findings by 49 percent compared to standard digital mammography, and reduced missed lesions by 40 percent, according to Dr. Carl D'Orsi, MD, professor of radiology, Emory University School of Medicine, and director of breast imaging.
"This finding is very significant because it shows the technology cuts by almost half the number of women who are recalled for additional tests, reduces the number of false positives that typically occur in standard mammograms and eliminates significant anxiety in patients and their loved ones," says Dr. D'Orsi.
"Standard mammography is widely considered to be one of the most difficult exams to read because lesions may be disguised by normal tissue," says Dr. D'Orsi. "At the same time, false-positives can also occur because of the two dimensional images provided by the existing technology."
Stereo mammography consists of two digital x-ray images of the breast acquired from two different points of view separated by about eight degrees. When the images are viewed on a stereo display workstation, the radiologist is able to see the internal structure of the breast in three dimensions.
In the study, researchers use a full-field digital mammography unit modified to take stereo pairs of images. A stereo display workstation allows the mammographer to fuse the stereo image pair, while viewing the breast in depth.
As of July 2007, 1,093 patients at elevated risk for developing breast cancer were enrolled in the clinical trial. Each patient received a full-field, standard digital mammography screening examination and a full-field, stereoscopic digital exam. The exams were read independently by different radiologists. A total of 259 suspicious findings were detected by the combined mammography procedures and were referred for additional diagnostic testing, including biopsy when indicated. Of those, 109 were determined to be true lesions. Standard mammography missed 40 of the 109 lesions while the stereoscopic exam failed to detect 24, a 40 percent decrease in missed lesions.
According to the researchers, increasing the use of stereo mammography at many institutions across the country would require simple upgrades to existing digital mammography equipment and software. The stereo digital exam currently takes the same amount of time to read as a standard mammogram, and researchers are working toward making radiation exposure in stereo scans comparable.
Emory University
"This finding is very significant because it shows the technology cuts by almost half the number of women who are recalled for additional tests, reduces the number of false positives that typically occur in standard mammograms and eliminates significant anxiety in patients and their loved ones," says Dr. D'Orsi.
"Standard mammography is widely considered to be one of the most difficult exams to read because lesions may be disguised by normal tissue," says Dr. D'Orsi. "At the same time, false-positives can also occur because of the two dimensional images provided by the existing technology."
Stereo mammography consists of two digital x-ray images of the breast acquired from two different points of view separated by about eight degrees. When the images are viewed on a stereo display workstation, the radiologist is able to see the internal structure of the breast in three dimensions.
In the study, researchers use a full-field digital mammography unit modified to take stereo pairs of images. A stereo display workstation allows the mammographer to fuse the stereo image pair, while viewing the breast in depth.
As of July 2007, 1,093 patients at elevated risk for developing breast cancer were enrolled in the clinical trial. Each patient received a full-field, standard digital mammography screening examination and a full-field, stereoscopic digital exam. The exams were read independently by different radiologists. A total of 259 suspicious findings were detected by the combined mammography procedures and were referred for additional diagnostic testing, including biopsy when indicated. Of those, 109 were determined to be true lesions. Standard mammography missed 40 of the 109 lesions while the stereoscopic exam failed to detect 24, a 40 percent decrease in missed lesions.
According to the researchers, increasing the use of stereo mammography at many institutions across the country would require simple upgrades to existing digital mammography equipment and software. The stereo digital exam currently takes the same amount of time to read as a standard mammogram, and researchers are working toward making radiation exposure in stereo scans comparable.
Emory University
Mammography Current Events and Mammography News RSSTamoxifen chemoprevention tied to early detection of breast cancer
The drug tamoxifen does not prevent or treat estrogen receptor (ER) negative breast cancer, but it can make the disease easier to find, researchers report in the Oct. 1 Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
Racial disparities decline for cancer in Missouri
Cancer death rates in the United States are highest among African Americans, but a new report shows that in Missouri the disparity in cancer incidence and death between African Americans and whites is declining.
Over-the-counter anesthetic gel puts the squeeze on mammogram pain
The simple application of a pain-relieving gel may reduce the breast discomfort some women experience during mammography exams, according to the results of a clinical trial published in the online edition of Radiology.
Risk of death after cancer diagnosis; shift in stage of breast cancer diagnosis
Cancer patients with low socioeconomic status (SES) have more advanced cancers at diagnosis, receive less aggressive treatment, and have a higher risk of dying in the five years following cancer diagnosis, according to a new study.
New possibilities for breast cancer treatment on the horizon
he first patient scans from a custom-built scanner combining positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT) technologies indicate that these scans could significantly improve breast cancer imaging capabilities and lead to more targeted treatment options, according to researchers at SNM's 55th Annual Meeting.
Kylie's breast cancer triggered a surge of over 30 percent in breast imaging of low-risk women
Use of mammography and breast ultrasound procedures soared by over 30 percent among women aged 25-44 in the 6 months following Kylie Minogue's breast cancer diagnosis, says a new study from the University of Melbourne.
Adding ultrasound screening to mammography brings benefits, risks
Adding a screening ultrasound examination to routine mammography reveals more breast cancers than mammography alone, according to results of a major new clinical trial. The trial, however, also found that adding an ultrasound exam also increases the rate of false positive findings and unnecessary biopsies.
Women 80 and Older Benefit from Mammography, but Few Are Screened
In the first study to assess mammography in women 80 and older, researchers found that having regular mammograms significantly decreases the risk of being diagnosed with late-stage breast cancer, but only about one-fifth of women in this age group receive them regularly.
American Cancer Society report details cancer prevention efforts
An annual report from the American Cancer Society highlights that long-term favorable trends have stalled for several factors that have been responsible for declining cancer death rates in the U.S.
Mammography may be beneficial to all women, regardless of age
According to researchers at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, mammography, the gold-standard for breast cancer screening and early detection, has shown to significantly reduce the risk of being diagnosed with advanced stage breast cancer in women over the age of 80, an age group currently without clear guidelines recommending regular screenings.
More Mammography Current Events and Mammography News Articles
 | Appleton & Lange Review of Mammography by Olive Peart An ideal review and self-assessment manual for radiologic technologists preparing for the Advanced Level Examination in Mammography. Filled with line diagrams & radiographs, the book covers instrumentation & quality assurance, anatomy, physiology & pathology of the breast, mammographic technique, and positioning & image... |
 | Mammography and Breast Imaging: Just The Facts (Just the Facts Series) by Olive Peart The perfect review tool for radiologic technologists certifying or recertifying. Following the guidelines specified by the American Registry of Radiologic Technologist (AART) Exam, the book includes all breast imaging modalities and techniques as well as questions for... |
 | Lange Q&A: Mammography Examination (Lange Q&a) by Olive Peart Everything you need to ace the ARRT Mammography Exam in one complete study package! Two complete practice tests plus easy-to-read summaries of all the must-know concepts for the most thorough exam prep available anywhere! Two practice tests in the book and on CD-ROM ensure that the real test is not your first test Questions on CD-ROM familiarizes you with the online testing... |
 | Mammography Exam Review by Jennifer R. Wagner, Erica Koch Wight The complete review solution for registered radiologic technologists seeking advanced certification in mammography, Mammography Exam Review provides comprehensive practice questions written in the style of the ARRT examination. It is the only review product available with additional computerized practice opportunities to help you gain experience taking the exam in an electronic format. Chapters... |
 | Teaching Atlas of Mammography by Laszlo Tabar, Peter Dean, Peter B. Dean In two bestselling editions, this cornerstone atlas has taught radiologists how to systematically analyze mammograms and arrive at a correct diagnosis. In this new third edition, conventional histology and full-color 3D images make mammographic findings even more understandable. Highlights of this classic text include: * The most comprehensive atlas of its kind, based on 80,000 mammographic... |
 | Rad Tech's Guide to Mammography: Physics, Instrumentation and Quality Control (Rad Tech's Guide Ser.) by Donald R. Jacobson The Rad Tech's Guide series provides an easy reference for the technologist who is preparing for the advanced level exam practice exams. The subjects match those tested on these exams. This user-friendly text can also be used as a quick overview by the practicing technologist and physician Provides brief overview for efficient exam review Practical pocket size at a good value ... |
| Mammography Review Valuepack (A&L Review of Mammography and Mammog and Breast Imaging: Just The Facts) (Appleton and Lange's Review) by Olive Peart The perfect review tools for radiologic technologists certifying or recertifying. This valuepack includes all resources needed for success on the Mammography / Breast Imaging tests administered to present and future... | |
 | Mammography Exam Secrets Study Guide: Mammography Test Review for the Mammography Exam by Mammography Exam Secrets Test Prep Team Mammography Exam Secrets helps you ace the Mammography Exam, without weeks and months of endless studying. Our comprehensive Mammography Exam Secrets study guide is written by our exam experts, who painstakingly researched every topic and concept that you need to know to ace your test. Our original research reveals specific weaknesses that you can exploit to increase your exam score more than... |
 | Understanding the Mammography Controversy: Science, Politics, and Breast Cancer Screening by Madelon L. Finkel Writing to be understood by the layreader, Finkel shows how breast cancer develops and explains the controversy surrounding mammography. How valid are the screenings? Who should be screened? How frequently? At what age? Should women be screened at all? This book dissects the issues to help discern answers. Above all, says Finkel. Women need to make informed decisions, and to do what they need to... |
 | Mammography and Beyond: Developing Technologies for the Early Detection of Breast Cancer by Committee on Technologies for the Early Detection of Breast Cancer, National Cancer Policy Board, Institute of Medicine, Division of Earth and Life Studies, National Research Council (Committee on Technologies for the Early Detection of Breast Cancer) Report of the committee which examined the current state of the art in early breast cancer detection, identifying new technologists, and the steps in medical technology development and policies influencing their adoption and use. DNLM: Breast... |
| © 2008 BrightSurf.com |