Confusion, not cheating, major factor in plagiarism among some studentsMarch 23, 2009Confusion about what constitutes plagiarism - not malicious intent - is the leading cause of plagiarism at the graduate school level, according to an expert presenting here today on the increasingly worrisome problem at the 237th National Meeting of the American Chemical Society (ACS). George M. Bodner, Ph.D., who serves on the Ethics Committee of the ACS, which is the world's largest scientific society, was among a panel of scientists who discussed plagiarism. Their presentations were part of an ACS initiative to educate the larger scientific community about ethics in chemistry. Bodner is a chemistry professor at Purdue University. Titled "Plagiarism: What is it? What Can We Do About It?," the symposium featured 8 speakers and was scheduled for Sunday March 22 at 8:30 a.m. in the Marriot City Center - Capitol B, Oral. In his talk, Bodner described one effort to address the problem of plagiarism called LANGURE for Land Grant University Research Ethics. Bodner worked with the project, a national collaboration of eight land grant and historically black universities, a private corporation, a national consortium for education in responsible conduct of research, and an open source software group. LANGURE involves more than 130 faculty and graduate students dedicated to developing a model curriculum in research ethics for doctoral candidates in science, engineering, and other fields. It provides graduate students across America with access to a credit course in ethics. Bodner is adapting a technique he uses in his classes to an online format to be incorporated as part of the LANGURE curriculum. It uses contextual examples to better explain the characteristics of plagiarism to his students. Confusion about what constitutes plagiarism may be rooted in undergraduate education, Bodner said. "There is something happening at the undergraduate level. We don't require enough writing and we do not do careful editing of what students write and, therefore, within the context of their own education, students are not properly educated and are more likely to fall into traps." Thomas Holme, Ph.D., another speaker at the symposium, has simple advice for his students on how to avoid plagiarism. Said Holme, a professor at Iowa State University: "I usually tell students if it's more than four words you better be quoting them." Bodner cited the lack of metrics to measure plagiarism cases. As a result, it is nearly impossible to tell how widespread the problem is and whether it really is on the increase. On the one hand, the Internet gives students access to vast amounts of text and other material that could be plagiarized. On the other, search engines enable professors and instructors to detect the unauthorized use of another person's writing or speech. The problem of unauthorized use of written material goes beyond students and plagiarism, Holme said in his report at the symposium. Holme, who directs the ACS Exams Institute, said that teachers sometimes unknowingly cross the line with unauthorized use of copyrighted standardized test questions, including those from ACS's widely used standardized tests in chemistry. "When someone puts a copyrighted test up on the Internet or incorporates questions from a copyrighted test into one of their own exams, that's a violation of copyright law and a serious matter," Holme explained. American Chemical Society |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Related Plagiarism Current Events and Plagiarism News Articles How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? It's a long-standing and crucial question that, as yet, remains unanswered: just how common is scientific misconduct? In the online, open-access journal PLoS ONE, Daniele Fanelli of the University of Edinburgh reports the first meta-analysis of surveys questioning scientists about their misbehaviours. Improved method for comparing genomes as well as written text Taking a hint from the text comparison methods used to detect plagiarism in books, college papers and computer programs, University of California, Berkeley, researchers have developed an improved method for comparing whole genome sequences. New framework on biomedical research fraud is toothless New proposals for tackling biomedical research fraud and misconduct in the UK lack sufficient clout to make any real difference, says the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). An account of the proposals, drawn up by the Academy of Medical Sciences, is published this week in COPE's fifth annual report, The COPE Report 2002. The Academy, an independent body of elected representatives from academic medicine and related medical science, was eventually charged with the task of devising a framework following a joint consensus meeting in Edinburgh in 1999. Representatives from regulatory and educational bodies, the pharmaceutical industry, publishers and the public attended the meeting and ag More Plagiarism Current Events and Plagiarism News Articles |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||