New guidance on data sharing will minimize risks to patient privacyJanuary 29, 2010Research methods and reporting: Preparing raw clinical data for publication: guidance for journal editors, authors, and peer reviewers New guidance published on bmj.com this week sets out how personal information from clinical trials should be shared to help minimise risks to patient privacy. Many peer reviewed journals now require authors to be prepared to share their raw, unprocessed data with other scientists or state the availability of raw data in published articles, but there has been little guidance on how such data should be prepared for sharing. So Iain Hrynaszkiewicz and colleagues offer practical advice for anonymising (or de- identifying) data to ensure patient privacy when sharing clinical research. They advise researchers to seek informed consent about data sharing from patients involved in clinical trials before studies begin. They list 28 items of personal and clinical information that can make patients identifiable in anonymised datasets, and recommend that, unless patients have explicitly consented, all direct identifiers such as names should be removed from datasets. And if three or more indirect identifiers such as age and sex are given about any patient, the researchers should ask an independent expert or an ethics committee to assess the risk of breaking confidentiality before sharing the data. They also recommend that researchers should make explicit statements in research articles that have linked raw data, about patients' consent to the sharing of those data. This, say the authors, should be the minimum standard for ensuring that participants' privacy is not put at unnecessary risk. In an accompanying editorial, Trish Groves, BMJ deputy editor says the BMJ is now adopting some of these recommendations. For example, the BMJ strongly supports the view that researchers should seek informed consent to data sharing from research participants up front, at the recruitment stage. The journal will also expand its advice to authors about data sharing, and will extend its data sharing statements to include explicit information about consent. BMJ-British Medical Journal |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Related Patient Privacy Current Events and Patient Privacy News Articles Insecurities plague electronic health care Information security and privacy in the healthcare sector is an issue of growing importance but much remains to be done to address the various issues raised by healthcare consumers regarding privacy and security and the providers' perspective of regulatory compliance. Major step ahead for cryptography Imagine you could work out the answer to a question, without knowing what the question was. For example, suppose someone thinks of two numbers and then asks another person to work out their sum, without letting them know what the two numbers are. However, they are given an encryption of the two numbers but not told how to decrypt them. Free e-samples of prescription drugs: At what cost? Search the Internet to learn about your asthma, high cholesterol or other common disorder, and odds are you'll be directed to a pharmaceutical company-sponsored Web homepage. Smart phones allow quick diagnosis of acute appendicitis Radiologists can accurately diagnose acute appendicitis from a remote location with the use of a handheld device or mobile phone equipped with special software. Physician use of HIT in hospitals linked to fewer deaths and complications, lower costs A study published today in the Archives of Internal Medicine, finds that when physicians in hospitals use health information technology (health IT) to its full potential there are fewer deaths, fewer complications, and lower health care costs. Study finds creating unique health ID numbers would improve health care quality, efficiency Creating a unique patient identification number for every person in the United States would facilitate a reduction in medical errors, simplify the use of electronic medical records, increase overall efficiency and help protect patient privacy, according to a new RAND Corporation study. Nation's only citywide electronic health information exchange: Improving health and lowering costs Across the nation concerns about health-care quality and costs are growing. For the first time, both candidates aspiring to the nation's highest office are looking to greater reliance on electronic medical records as critical to any remedy. Protecting patient privacy the new fashioned way Protecting patient privacy has been recognized as the duty of health-care providers for about as long as doctors have seen patients. In 1996 that duty became a legal obligation when Congress passed the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. One in ten hospital lift rides breach patient privacy More than one in ten hospital lift rides breach patient privacy, according to a study in this week's BMJ. Concern over UK laws on genetic testing In the February Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, Anna Dixon, Anant Murthy and Dr Elias Mossialos raise concerns about the way insurers can use information from genetic tests. The authors, from the European Observatory on Health Care Systems at the London School of Economics & Political Scence, point out that the current lack of regulation in the UK has a “strong potential for the improper use of genetic testing data”. Is the UK lagging behind? According to Dixon, Murthy and Mossialos, “the UK stands alone in its policies towards insurers”. In the US, 28 states either restrict or completely ban any use of genetic data for underwriting purposes. Austria, Denma More Patient Privacy Current Events and Patient Privacy News Articles |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||