Nav: Home

The effect of multiple brand comparisions

January 07, 2005

It's the great debate as a consumer. Should you drive all over town, visit several different stores, compare many different options, and then try to make a decision? Or, are you better off just walking into what you consider to be a pretty good store, finding essentially what you want, and buying it? Well, an article published in the December issue of the Journal of Consumer Research finds that regardless of what above option is better, you'll undoubtedly feel more positive about the option you pick if you take the latter approach and evaluate it singly rather than as a part of a bigger group of options.

"One of the most common forms of consumer judgment is singular evaluation; the evaluation or appraisal of singular brands. Three experiments show that singular evaluation is often characterized by a brand positivity effect--brands tend to be evaluated more positively than warranted when judged in isolation," writes Steven Posavac of University of Rochester Simon School of Business and his colleagues.

What is interesting about singular evaluation is that not only is a brand evaluated more positively when isolated than when a part of a larger group, the consumer will often be more positive about this isolated choice than even the average of a group of choices. Thus, those who shop around and tend to pick the middle of the road option may come home less excited about a choice than if they simply picked a single option.

"Consistent with our theorizing (...) focal brands belonging to very different categories were perceived to be better than the average brand in the set of best brands from which the focal brands were drawn," Posavac and his colleagues explain.

And, in addition to perception, the authors state that feeling good about the product tends to lead to purchasing it more often than simply purchasing the average option of a bigger group.
-end-
From: The Brand Positivity Effect: When Evaluation Confers Preference. STEVEN S. POSAVAC, DAVID M. SANBONMATSU, FRANK R. KARDES, GAVAN J. FITZSIMONS.

University of Chicago Press Journals

Related Brands Articles:

What's the secret behind the world's stickiest brands?
Sticky customer journeys do not arise from consistently good customer experiences -- instead, they are intentionally chaotic, maddening, and unpredictable.
Words matter when it comes to apparel for people living with disabilitie
Brands should consider the language they use when marketing products to this group of consumers, according to a new study from the University of Missouri.
What's your brand?
Researchers created an algorithm that successfully predicted consumer purchases. The algorithm made use of data from the consumers' daily activity on social media.
Study: 'Value instantiation' key to luxury brands' and social responsibility
Although luxury brands and social responsibility seem fundamentally inconsistent with each other, the two entities can coexist in the mind of the consumer, provided the brand can find someone -- typically, a celebrity -- who successfully embodies the two conflicting value sets, says new research co-written by Carlos Torelli, a professor of business administration and James F.
Following scientific literature review, Imperial Brands calls for legalisation of snus in EU
Following a new literature review of the harm reduction potential of snus, Imperial Brands -- owners of leading snus brand Skruf -- has urged the European Union (EU) to re-examine its position on the product.
Paper: Cultural variables influence consumer demand for private-label brands
Consumer attitudes toward private-label store brands might be driven more by social variables than price, says new research co-written by Carlos Torelli, a professor of business administration and James F.
70% of teens surveyed engaged with food and beverage brands on social media in 2017
70% of teens surveyed report engaging with food and beverage brands on social media and 35 percent engaged with at least five brands, according to a new study from the UConn Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity.
Study finds brands are resilient against 'fake news' on social media
'Fake news' stories targeting corporations may be obnoxious, but a new study finds that they likely pose little threat to well-established brands.
Fashion brands' business practices undermining progress on ending garment worker exploitation
Top fashion companies that are pledging to end worker exploitation in their global supply chains are hampering progress through their own irresponsible sourcing practices, concludes a new report published today on working conditions in the Southern Indian garment industry powerhouse.
Going green? Not so easy for mainstream brands
Recent research shows that when mainstream brands advertise using visual cues suggesting the product is environmentally friendly or 'green' consumers may actually evaluate the product as being less effective and switch to a more niche green brand.
More Brands News and Brands Current Events

Trending Science News

Current Coronavirus (COVID-19) News

Top Science Podcasts

We have hand picked the top science podcasts of 2020.
Now Playing: TED Radio Hour

Listen Again: The Power Of Spaces
How do spaces shape the human experience? In what ways do our rooms, homes, and buildings give us meaning and purpose? This hour, TED speakers explore the power of the spaces we make and inhabit. Guests include architect Michael Murphy, musician David Byrne, artist Es Devlin, and architect Siamak Hariri.
Now Playing: Science for the People

#576 Science Communication in Creative Places
When you think of science communication, you might think of TED talks or museum talks or video talks, or... people giving lectures. It's a lot of people talking. But there's more to sci comm than that. This week host Bethany Brookshire talks to three people who have looked at science communication in places you might not expect it. We'll speak with Mauna Dasari, a graduate student at Notre Dame, about making mammals into a March Madness match. We'll talk with Sarah Garner, director of the Pathologists Assistant Program at Tulane University School of Medicine, who takes pathology instruction out of...
Now Playing: Radiolab

What If?
There's plenty of speculation about what Donald Trump might do in the wake of the election. Would he dispute the results if he loses? Would he simply refuse to leave office, or even try to use the military to maintain control? Last summer, Rosa Brooks got together a team of experts and political operatives from both sides of the aisle to ask a slightly different question. Rather than arguing about whether he'd do those things, they dug into what exactly would happen if he did. Part war game part choose your own adventure, Rosa's Transition Integrity Project doesn't give us any predictions, and it isn't a referendum on Trump. Instead, it's a deeply illuminating stress test on our laws, our institutions, and on the commitment to democracy written into the constitution. This episode was reported by Bethel Habte, with help from Tracie Hunte, and produced by Bethel Habte. Jeremy Bloom provided original music. Support Radiolab by becoming a member today at Radiolab.org/donate.     You can read The Transition Integrity Project's report here.