Why independent cultures think alike when it comes to categories: It's not in the brain

January 12, 2021

Imagine you gave the exact same art pieces to two different groups of people and asked them to curate an art show. The art is radical and new. The groups never speak with one another, and they organize and plan all the installations independently. On opening night, imagine your surprise when the two art shows are nearly identical. How did these groups categorize and organize all the art the same way when they never spoke with one another?

The dominant hypothesis is that people are born with categories already in their brains, but a study from the Network Dynamics Group (NDG) at the Annenberg School for Communication has discovered a novel explanation. In an experiment in which people were asked to categorize unfamiliar shapes, individuals and small groups created many different unique categorization systems while large groups created systems nearly identical to one another.

"If people are all born seeing the world the same way, we would not observe so many differences in how individuals organize things," says senior author Damon Centola, Professor of Communication, Sociology, and Engineering at the University of Pennsylvania. "But this raises a big scientific puzzle. If people are so different, why do anthropologists find the same categories, for instance for shapes, colors, and emotions, arising independently in many different cultures? Where do these categories come from and why is there so much similarity across independent populations?"

To answer this question, the researchers assigned participants to various sized groups, ranging from 1 to 50, and then asked them to play an online game in which they were shown unfamiliar shapes that they then had to categorize in a meaningful way. All of the small groups invented wildly different ways of categorizing the shapes. Yet, when large groups were left to their own devices, each one independently invented a nearly identical category system.

"If I assign an individual to a small group, they are much more likely to arrive at a category system that is very idiosyncratic and specific to them," says lead author and Annenberg alum Douglas Guilbeault (Ph.D. '20), now an Assistant Professor at the Haas School of Business at the University of California, Berkeley. "But if I assign that same individual to a large group, I can predict the category system that they will end up creating, regardless of whatever unique viewpoint that person happens to bring to the table."

"Even though we predicted it," Centola adds, "I was nevertheless stunned to see it really happen. This result challenges many long—held ideas about culture and how it forms."

The explanation is connected to previous work conducted by the NDG on tipping points and how people interact within networks. As options are suggested within a network, certain ones begin to be reinforced as they are repeated through individuals' interactions with one another, and eventually a particular idea has enough traction to take over and become dominant. This only applies to large enough networks, but according to Centola, even just 50 people is enough to see this phenomenon occur.

Centola and Guilbeault say they plan to build on their findings and apply them to a variety of real—world problems. One current study involves content moderation on Facebook and Twitter. Can the process of categorizing free speech versus hate speech (and thus what should be allowed versus removed) be improved if done in networks rather than by solitary individuals? Another current study is investigating how to use network interactions among physicians and other health care professionals to decrease the likelihood that patients will be incorrectly diagnosed or treated due to prejudice or bias, like racism or sexism. These topics are explored in Centola's forthcoming book, CHANGE: How to Make Big Things Happen (Little, Brown & Co., 2021).

"Many of the worst social problems reappear in every culture, which leads some to believe these problems are intrinsic to the human condition," says Centola. "Our research shows that these problems are intrinsic to the social experiences humans have, not necessarily to humans themselves. If we can alter that social experience, we can change the way people organize things, and address some of the world's greatest problems."
-end-
The study, entitled "Experimental Evidence for Scale—Induced Category Convergence across Populations," was published in Nature Communications. Authors include Guilbeault; Andrea Baronchelli, City University London; and Centola. This study was partially funded by a Dissertation Award granted to Guilbeault by the Institute for Research on Innovation and Science at the University of Michigan.

University of Pennsylvania

Related Art Articles from Brightsurf:

Drawing the line to answer art's big questions
Algorithms have shown that the compositional structure of Western landscape paintings changed 'suspiciously' smoothly between 1500 and 2000 AD, potentially indicating a selection bias by art curators or in art historical literature, physicists from the Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST) and colleagues report in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS).

Robot swarms follow instructions to create art
Controlling a swarm of robots to paint a picture sounds like a difficult task.

Images of captive torment in art
Between the arrival of pearl divers and war brides - long after Japanese performers toured Australia 150 years ago - an untold chapter of World War Two history has emerged in a new study of wartime art made by almost 5000 prisoners of war in Australia and New Zealand.

Quantifying creativity to expand it? Better art begins with better understanding
Do different painting materials affect the creation of children's paintings?

Doubts about the Nerja cave art having been done by neanderthals
Prehistory research staff at the University of Cordoba is investigating the reliability of Uranium-thorium dating for a chronological study of Paleolithic art and is contesting that Neanderthals made the Paeolithic art in Spanish caves.

Miniature rock art expands horizons
Australian archaeologists have discovered some of the most detailed examples of rare, small-scale rock art in the form of miniature stencils in a rockshelter traditionally owned by the Marra people.

Getting to the 'art' of dementia: UC researchers highlight benefits of art intervention
University of Canberra researchers have shown that art gallery programs can improve the wellbeing of people living with dementia -- and they've backed it up by testing study participants' saliva.

Is virtual reality the next big thing in art therapy?
Researchers from Drexel University's College of Nursing and Health Professions in the Creative Arts Therapies Department conducted a study to see if virtual reality can be used as an expressive tool in art therapy.

The art of cancer caregiving: How art therapies benefits those caring for cancer patients
A recent Drexel University study showed coloring and open-studio art therapy benefits stressed caregivers of cancer patients.

Study shows we like our math like we like our art: Beautiful
A beautiful landscape painting, a beautiful piano sonata -- art and music are almost exclusively described in terms of aesthetics, but what about math?

Read More: Art News and Art Current Events
Brightsurf.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.