Long-Term Stewardship Of DOE's Nuclear Weapons Complex Addressed At RFF Workshop

January 17, 1997

WASHINGTON, DC -- More than 40 experts on risk management, land use and the nation's nuclear weapons complex gathered at Resources for the Future (RFF) to discuss the challenges faced in assuring protection from risks to human health and the environment posed by hazards remaining at the nation's nuclear weapons production sites once the United States Department of Energy (DOE) completes its major cleanup activities.

Held on January 16-17, 1997, and hosted by RFF's Center for Risk Management, the two-day workshop addressed long-term stewardship -- the development of institutions, information, and strategies to assure protection of people and the environment well into the future. Once DOE completes the monumental task of cleaning up and managing the vast quantities of hazardous and radioactive materials left behind from decades of nuclear weapons production in 34 states, the next major challenge will be to assure long-term stewardship.

Currently, DOE spends approximately $6 billion each year for environmental management activities. Although a recent DOE initiative aims to accomplish much of the cleanup within 10 years, this unprecedented task may ultimately require decades to complete at a projected cost to taxpayers of more than $200 billion, according to some estimates.

"Regardless of the time and resources invested, portions of many sites in the nation's nuclear weapons complex will not be returned to a state safe enough for unrestricted use," said Katherine Probst, workshop coordinator and a senior fellow in RFF's Center for Risk Management. "In fact, after all planned cleanup activities have been completed, some site areas will remain highly contaminated, support long-term storage and disposal facilities for dangerous wastes and materials, or harbor uncertain levels of residual contamination."

The nuclear arms race between the U.S. and the former Soviet Union resulted in a vast research, production, and testing network that is known as the nuclear weapons complex. During half a century of operations, tens of thousands of nuclear warheads were manufactured and more than one thousand were detonated. At its peak, the complex consisted of 16 major sites, including vast reservations of land in Nevada, Idaho, Washington, and South Carolina; national laboratories in New Mexico and California; and other facilities in Colorado, Florida, Missouri, Ohio, and Tennessee where weapons components were produced.

In its drive to build large numbers of nuclear weapons, the U.S. government based its production decisions on expediency to ensure national security, with threats to health, safety and the environment accorded secondary importance. With the arms race over and weapons production severely curtailed, DOE is now focused on cleaning up over 100 sites across the country, many of which harbor widespread contamination of soil and water resulting from mismanaged radioactive materials and toxic chemicals.

"With a completion strategy for cleaning up most sites in the nuclear weapons complex within 10 years, now is the time to look ahead at what's next," said Alvin Alm, assistant secretary for environmental management at DOE. "We need to begin driving toward a goal for long-term stewardship that is flexible enough to accommodate changes in public opinion, technology, the health effects evidence, and budget allocations, among other uncertainties. We have to be able to assure protection not just in the next fiscal year but well into the next century."

Many questions regarding long-term stewardship addressed at the workshop include: Do our obligations to future generations compel us to institute a long-term stewardship program? What are the desirable characteristics of a viable long-term stewardship program? What is the appropriate role of state and local governments? What are the long-term implications if a stewardship program fails?

Likely components of a long-term stewardship program discussed include: reliable institutional controls to prevent inappropriate land and ground-water use; maintenance of waste disposal facilities to ensure continued containment of disposed wastes; establishment and preservation of information systems to keep future populations apprised of site hazards; and long-term surveillance and monitoring of remaining hazards.

Workshop participants included: Alvin Alm, DOE's assistant secretary for environmental management; Tara O'Toole, DOE's assistant secretary for its Office of Environment Safety and Health; Roger Kasperson, provost of Clark University; Russell Jim, manager of environmental restoration for Yakima Nation; Joe King, city manager of Richland, Washington; and, Terry Davies, director of RFF's Center for Risk Management.

A summary of the workshop will be available in February, and a discussion paper outlining the need for and possible structure of a long-term stewardship program will be issued by RFF in the Spring of 1997. Both will be posted to RFF's internet site at http://www.rff.org.
-end-
Resources for the Future (RFF) is an independent, nonprofit organization that aims to provide accurate, objective information to policy makers, legislators, public opinion leaders, environmentalists, and the public to help them responsibly meet the nation's and the world's long-term environmental and economic needs. For the past 45 years, researchers at RFF have analyzed issues involving forests, water, energy, minerals, transportation, sustainable development, and air pollution. They also have examined, from a variety of perspectives, such topics as government regulation, risk, ecosystems and biodiversity, climate, hazardous waste management, technology, and outer space. RFF neither lobbies nor takes positions on specific legislative or regulatory proposals, and its research staff represents one of the largest groups of economists and policy analysts devoted to environmental and natural resource issues working under one roof anywhere in the world. RFF's Center for Risk Management performs research, policy analysis, and outreach related to the management of risks to health and the environment. Its research focuses on three basic questions: What are the most important risks to address? What are the most effective, efficient, and equitable methods for dealing with risks? How can the implementation of risk reduction programs be improved?

# # #

Resources for the Future (RFF)

Related Nuclear Weapons Articles from Brightsurf:

Difficult to build a family after exposure to chemical weapons
People who have been exposed to chemical warfare agents (CWAs) feel uncertain, decades after the exposure, about their survival and ability to build a family, a University of Gothenburg study shows.

Nuclear medicine and COVID-19: New content from The Journal of Nuclear Medicine
In one of five new COVID-19-related articles and commentaries published in the June issue of The Journal of Nuclear Medicine, Johnese Spisso discusses how the UCLA Hospital System has dealt with the pandemic.

Americans perceive likelihood of nuclear weapons risk as 50/50 tossup
It has been 30 years since the end of the Cold War, yet on average, Americans still perceive that the odds of a nuclear weapon detonating on U.S. soil is as likely as a coin toss, according to new research from Stevens Institute of Technology.

Nuclear physics -- probing a nuclear clock transition
Physicists have measured the energy associated with the decay of a metastable state of the thorium-229 nucleus.

Lifelong ill-health after exposure to chemical weapons
People exposed to chemical warfare agents (CWAs) often incur chronic damage to their lungs, skin and eyes, for example.

New genetic weapons challenge sickle cell disease
Researchers advancing gene-editing techniques to help patients with sickle cell disease discover an unexpected boost in fetal hemoglobin production, which mutes the effect of the disease.

Drop your weapons!
It takes energy to make weapons, but it may take even more energy to maintain them.

Preventing chemical weapons as sciences converge
Scientists from Bradford warn of increased chemical weapons risk during a period of very rapid scientific change.

How science can inform chemical weapons arms control
In 2013, the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for its work in eliminating many of the declared chemical weapons stockpiles worldwide.

For nuclear weapons reduction, a way to verify without revealing
MIT researchers have found a new way of verifying nuclear weapons reduction agreements without revealing secret information, using a physical cryptographic key and nuclear resonant phenomena.

Read More: Nuclear Weapons News and Nuclear Weapons Current Events
Brightsurf.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.