Nav: Home

Access to anesthesia care is not improved when states eliminate physician supervision

January 19, 2017

CHICAGO - Patient access to anesthesia care for seven common surgical procedures is not increased when states "opt-out" of the Medicare rule that requires anesthesia to be administered with physician supervision, reports a study published in the Online First edition of Anesthesiology, the peer-reviewed medical journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA). The study showed that "opt-out" states did not experience a reduction in the distance patients were required to travel for their procedure -- a common measure used to gauge access to care.

"The assertion is that by opting-out of the federal rule requiring physician supervision, the pool of potential anesthesia providers will be expanded, and patients will not have to travel as far for procedures, surgery or anesthesia care," said Eric Sun, M.D., Ph.D., study author and assistant professor of anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine at Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California. "It would be advantageous to decrease the distance patients must travel for surgery and anesthesia care, especially older patients, but our research is showing that 'opting-out' may not be accomplishing this goal."

Since 2001, 17 state governors exercised the option to "opt-out" of the federal rule that physicians supervise the administration of anesthesia by nurse anesthetists, citing increased access to anesthesia care as the rationale for the decision. However, until the current study, and a previous paper published by the same researchers in February 2016 that found a lower growth in anesthesia cases in "opt-out" states versus non-opt-out states, no research had looked at whether opting-out of the federal rule achieved improved access.

In the study, researchers used Medicare administrative claims data from more than 1.1 million cases to determine the distance Medicare patients traveled for five common elective procedures: total knee replacement, total hip replacement, cataract surgery, colonoscopy/ sigmoidoscopy, and esophagogastroduodenoscopy, as well as two common urgent procedures for which timely access to care is important: appendectomy and hip fracture repair. Procedures were performed between 1999 and 2011. Access to anesthesia care was measured by the percentage of patients who had to travel outside of their residential zip code for their procedure, and the average distance these patients traveled (variances in land area for each zip code were adjusted). Researchers examined distance traveled for these procedures before and after the decision to "opt-out" in "opt out" states. To rule out more general changes in travel distance (for example, due to trends in hospital closures occurring nationally), the researchers compared these changes to changes in the distances traveled for patients in non-opt-out states.

There was no reduction in the percentage of patients who traveled outside of their residential zip code for the seven procedures examined in "opt-out" states, except for total hip replacement (2 percentage point reduction). However, the authors note that since more than 80 percent of total hip replacement patients traveled outside their residential zip code, this effect is of little practical significance. For those who did travel outside of their zip code, "opt out" had no significant effect on the distance traveled.

"Patients in 'opt-out' states were no less likely to avoid traveling further distances to undergo these common procedures, than those in non-opt-out states," said Dr. Sun. "By looking at distance traveled as a measure of access, we're adding to the body of literature that increasingly shows 'opt-out' is unlikely to be a silver bullet when it comes to improving access to care."
The study, "Opt Out and Access to Anesthesia Care for Elective and Urgent Surgeries Among U.S. Medicare Beneficiaries," was funded by a Mentored Research Training Grant from the Foundation for Anesthesia Education and Research (FAER).


Founded in 1905, the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) is an educational, research and scientific society with more than 52,000 members organized to raise and maintain the standards of the medical practice of anesthesiology. ASA is committed to ensuring that physician anesthesiologists evaluate and supervise the medical care of patients before, during, and after surgery to provide the highest quality and safest care that every patient deserves.

For more information on the field of anesthesiology, visit the American Society of Anesthesiologists online at To learn more about the role physician anesthesiologists play in ensuring patient safety, visit

American Society of Anesthesiologists

Related Anesthesia Articles:

Is headache from anesthesia after childbirth associated with risk of bleeding around brain?
This study examined whether postpartum women with headache from anesthesia after neuraxial anesthesia (such as epidural) during childbirth had increased risk of being diagnosed with bleeding around the brain (intracranial subdural hematoma).
Music can be a viable alternative to medications in reducing anxiety before anesthesia
Music is a viable alternative to sedative medications in reducing patient anxiety prior to a peripheral nerve block procedure, according to a new Penn Medicine study.
In cases when patients under anesthesia experience anaphylaxis, hyperactive immune...
A study of 86 patients reveals how drugs used for anesthesia can induce life-threatening anaphylaxis (a dangerous type of allergic reaction) through an alternative immune pathway.
General anesthesia hijacks sleep circuitry to knock you out
In a study published online April 18 in Neuron, researchers found that general anesthesia induces unconsciousness by hijacking the neural circuitry that makes us fall sleep.
Anesthesia sends neurons down the wrong path in unborn rat babies
A study in Cerebral Cortex provides new insight into why -- and when -- anesthesia during pregnancy harms unborn brains.
Less anesthesia during surgery doesn't prevent post-op delirium
One in four older adults experiences delirium after surgery. Researchers at Washington University School of Medicine in St.
Experts recommend new way to describe cognitive changes after anesthesia, surgery in elderly patient
A multidisciplinary, international group of experts has recommended changing the way clinicians and patients describe cognitive changes experienced in some patients after anesthesia and surgery.
Focus on neuroscience, nociception to improve anesthesia, paper says
By focusing on nervous system circuits of nociception, the body's sensing of tissue damge, anesthesiologists can achieve unconsciousness in patients using less drug and manage post-operative pain better, leading to less need for opioids.
Zebrafish research highlights role of locus coeruleus in anesthesia
Recently, researchers from the Institute of Neuroscience and Zunyi Medical College, by using a larval zebrafish model, revealed that two commonly used intravenous anesthetic drugs, propofol and etomidate, suppress the excitability of locus coeruleus neurons via synergic mechanisms -- thus inhibiting presynaptic excitatory inputs and inducing membrane hyperpolarization of these cells.
HSS anesthesia education program sees sustainable results in Vietnam
Training local clinicians with regional anesthesia techniques has helped the Vietnamese medical community improve their approach to anesthesia care, results of a survey conducted by the Global Health Initiative at Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) indicate.
More Anesthesia News and Anesthesia Current Events

Best Science Podcasts 2019

We have hand picked the best science podcasts for 2019. Sit back and enjoy new science podcasts updated daily from your favorite science news services and scientists.
Now Playing: TED Radio Hour

Rethinking Anger
Anger is universal and complex: it can be quiet, festering, justified, vengeful, and destructive. This hour, TED speakers explore the many sides of anger, why we need it, and who's allowed to feel it. Guests include psychologists Ryan Martin and Russell Kolts, writer Soraya Chemaly, former talk radio host Lisa Fritsch, and business professor Dan Moshavi.
Now Playing: Science for the People

#538 Nobels and Astrophysics
This week we start with this year's physics Nobel Prize awarded to Jim Peebles, Michel Mayor, and Didier Queloz and finish with a discussion of the Nobel Prizes as a way to award and highlight important science. Are they still relevant? When science breakthroughs are built on the backs of hundreds -- and sometimes thousands -- of people's hard work, how do you pick just three to highlight? Join host Rachelle Saunders and astrophysicist, author, and science communicator Ethan Siegel for their chat about astrophysics and Nobel Prizes.