Nav: Home

Twitter fake news engagement during 2016 election was highly concentrated and conservative-leaning

January 24, 2019

By studying how more than 16,000 American registered voters interacted with fake news sources on Twitter during the 2016 U.S. presidential election, researchers report that engagement with fake news was extremely concentrated. Only a small fraction of Twitter users accounted for the vast majority of fake news exposures and shares, they say, many among them older, conservative and politically engaged. This work, like past studies, shows that the vast majority of exposure to political news, across all groups, still came from popular non-fake news sources, which is "reassuring," say the authors; it's in contrast to claims of fake news garnering more engagement than real news during the election. Thrust into the spotlight during the 2016 U.S. presidential election season, the concept of fake news to describe the sharing of misinformation on social media has quickly become ingrained in the modern zeitgeist. Newly developing research on the topic has attempted to explain its broader impact on society. However, the scope and scale of the phenomenon has been difficult to fully grasp - complicated by the challenge of measuring human behavior through social media data and obfuscated further by the role of automated "bot" accounts. To overcome these challenges and better understand how real humans interact with fake news, Nir Grinberg and colleagues leveraged Twitter data linked to public voter registration records, studying the tweets sent by 16,442 accounts from August to December 2016 (the U.S. election season). To define fake news, the authors followed past work defining fake news outlets as those that have the trappings of legitimately produced news, but "lack the news media's editorial norms..." (The attribution of "fakeness" is thus not at the level of the story but that of the publisher.) According to Grinberg et al.'s findings, only about 1% of the Twitter users they studied accounted for 80% of exposures to fake news content. Furthermore, 0.1% were responsible for 81% of the fake news shared. For most people - voters spanning the political spectrum - political news exposure came from factual media outlets.

In a related Perspective, Derek Ruths discusses Grinberg et al.'s study within the context of misinformation research writ large. According to Ruths, studies on the topic that appear to report competing views are often actually complementary, each providing insight into a single cog of what could be described as a "complex misinformation machine." Conflicting conclusions from similar studies could be due to a general lack of consensus on how fake news is defined. Grinberg et al., for example, approach the question by looking at the sources of fake news and their publication practices, while in a 2018 study also published in Science, Vosoughi et al. defined fake news at the level of the individual story. The two studies drew seemingly conflicting conclusions. However, Ruths emphasizes that when underlying approaches are more carefully considered, the two studies together tell a detailed, cohesive story: Grinberg et al.'s results indicate that specific and small communities engage with fake news sources, and that publishers with weak journalistic standards are far more likely to produce misinformation. Vosoughi et al. continue this trajectory by showing that, once produced, fake news stories spread with greater effect and speed than true stories. The findings of Grinberg et al. also show conservatives' disposition for consuming and sharing fake news. However, Ruths suggests these conclusions may not be as cut and dry as they seem, and suggests a more likely scenario where liberals, too, embed and spread misinformation in ways that have not yet been identified - an understanding of which is central to placing fake news within the context of larger systems of misinformation.

American Association for the Advancement of Science

Related Social Media Articles:

Social media use by adolescents linked to internalizing behaviors
A new study from researchers at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health found that adolescents who spend more than three hours a day on social media are more likely to report high levels of internalizing behaviors compared to adolescents who do not use social media at all.
Social media stress can lead to social media addiction
Social network users risk becoming more and more addicted to social media platforms even as they experience stress from their use.
Many post on social media under the influence of drugs -- and regret it
Posting on social media, texting, and appearing in photos while high is prevalent among people who use drugs--and many regret these behaviors, according to a study by the Center for Drug Use and HIV/HCV Research (CDUHR) at NYU College of Global Public Health.
'Fake news,' diminishing media trust and the role of social media
Exploring the perception of the 'fake news' phenomenon is critical to combating the ongoing global erosion of trust in the media according to a study co-authored by a University of Houston researcher.
How gender inequality is reproduced on social media
Researchers from Higher School of Economics analyzed 62 million public posts on the most popular Russian social networking site VK and found that both men and women mention sons more often than daughters.
More Social Media News and Social Media Current Events

Best Science Podcasts 2019

We have hand picked the best science podcasts for 2019. Sit back and enjoy new science podcasts updated daily from your favorite science news services and scientists.
Now Playing: TED Radio Hour

Erasing The Stigma
Many of us either cope with mental illness or know someone who does. But we still have a hard time talking about it. This hour, TED speakers explore ways to push past — and even erase — the stigma. Guests include musician and comedian Jordan Raskopoulos, neuroscientist and psychiatrist Thomas Insel, psychiatrist Dixon Chibanda, anxiety and depression researcher Olivia Remes, and entrepreneur Sangu Delle.
Now Playing: Science for the People

#537 Science Journalism, Hold the Hype
Everyone's seen a piece of science getting over-exaggerated in the media. Most people would be quick to blame journalists and big media for getting in wrong. In many cases, you'd be right. But there's other sources of hype in science journalism. and one of them can be found in the humble, and little-known press release. We're talking with Chris Chambers about doing science about science journalism, and where the hype creeps in. Related links: The association between exaggeration in health related science news and academic press releases: retrospective observational study Claims of causality in health news: a randomised trial This...