Nav: Home

Evaluating the benefits of health insurance on cancer care

January 27, 2017

Jan, 27, 2017, Lebanon, N.H. -- Millions of Americans acquire their health insurance under the Affordable Care Act, including individuals from disadvantaged communities (as defined by a summary measure comprised of U.S. Census measures of income, education, and employment). Patients with one of the four leading causes of cancer deaths have lower rates of cancer-specific survival based on where they live, specifically based on their social determinants of health. The extent to which health insurance can ease the effects of these social determinants of health on cancer care is the subject of current research led by Dartmouth-Hitchcock Norris Cotton Cancer Center's Sandra Wong, MD, Professor and Chair of Surgery, Senior Vice President of the Surgical Services Line and Interim Vice President of the Oncology Service Line. Her work, "The impact of health insurance status on cancer care in disadvantaged communities" was recently published in the journal, Cancer.

Wong's study finds that the effect of having health insurance appears to be more pronounced in those from disadvantaged communities, compared to more advantaged communities, through better access to cancer care. However, the differences attributed to social determinants of health were not fully mitigated. Insured patients from less disadvantaged communities still had higher odds of receiving cancer-directed surgery and better cancer-specific survival than insured patients from disadvantaged communities. Interestingly, Medicaid insurance was associated with a much more modest survival benefit in those from disadvantaged communities.

"We were seeking to examine the differential impact of health insurance on cancer care across communities with varying social determinants of health" says Wong. "To the best of our knowledge, this is the first national study to explore the interplay between health insurance and social determinants of health and the resultant impact on cancer care and cancer outcomes."

The Dartmouth-Hitchcock study collected Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry data for 364,507 patients diagnosed with the four highest causes of cancer deaths: breast cancer, prostate cancer, lung cancer, and colorectal cancer, between 2007 and 2011. In the entire cohort, 304,224 patients (83.5%) were insured, 43,572 (12%) had Medicaid coverage, and 16,711 (4.6%) were uninsured. A social determinant score was determined based on five measures of wealth, education, and employment. In order to quantify the differences in the effects of health insurance on these varying social strata, patients were stratified into quintiles, the lowest quintile representing the most disadvantaged communities. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate associations and cancer-specific survival within each quintile. The models were respectively adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, marital status, cancer type, and stage.

Researchers found a consistent relation between a community's relative advantage and cancer-specific care, survival and outcomes. Although health insurance appeared to lessen this relation, it did not fully eliminate the differences caused by the measured social determinants of health. Notably, patients from disadvantaged communities had a larger relative benefit from health insurance, which demonstrated their need for improved access to care.

"These data will help inform ongoing healthcare payment reform efforts," says Wong. "Those from the most disadvantaged communities benefit the most from health insurance, but there are still disparities compared the most advantaged communities. Provisions for insurance are necessary but insufficient to eliminate inequities in cancer outcomes. Attention is also needed for community-level efforts and closer examination of the social determinants of health."
This work was supported by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (T32 HS000053-22), the National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute (1K07 CA163665-22), the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Research Foundation, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (1K08 HS20937-01), and the American Cancer Society (RSG-12-269-01-CPHPS).

About Norris Cotton Cancer Center at Dartmouth-Hitchcock

Norris Cotton Cancer Center combines advanced cancer research at Dartmouth's Geisel School of Medicine with patient-centered cancer care provided at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center in Lebanon, NH, at Dartmouth-Hitchcock regional locations in Manchester, Nashua and Keene, NH, and St. Johnsbury, VT, and at partner hospitals throughout New Hampshire and Vermont. It is one of 45 centers nationwide to earn the National Cancer Institute's "Comprehensive Cancer Center" designation. Learn more about Norris Cotton Cancer Center research, programs, and clinical trials online at

Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

Related Prostate Cancer Articles:

ASCO and Cancer Care Ontario update guideline on radiation therapy for prostate cancer
The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and Cancer Care Ontario today issued a joint clinical practice guideline update on brachytherapy (internal radiation) for patients with prostate cancer.
Patient prostate tissue used to create unique model of prostate cancer biology
For the first time, researchers have been able to grow, in a lab, both normal and primary cancerous prostate cells from a patient, and then implant a million of the cancer cells into a mouse to track how the tumor progresses.
Moffitt Cancer Center awarded $3.2 million grant to study bone metastasis in prostate cancer
Moffitt researchers David Basanta, Ph.D., and Conor Lynch, Ph.D., have been awarded a U01 grant to investigate prostate cancer metastasis.
New findings concerning hereditary prostate cancer
For the first time ever, researchers have differentiated the risks of developing indolent or aggressive prostate cancer in men with a family history of the disease.
Prostate cancer discovery may make it easier to kill cancer cells
A newly discovered connection between two common prostate cancer treatments may soon make prostate cancer cells easier to destroy.
New test for prostate cancer significantly improves prostate cancer screening
A study from Karolinska Institutet in Sweden shows that a new test for prostate cancer is better at detecting aggressive cancer than PSA.
The dilemma of screening for prostate cancer
Primary care providers are put in a difficult position when screening their male patients for prostate cancer -- some guidelines suggest that testing the general population lacks evidence whereas others state that it is appropriate in certain patients.
Risk factors for prostate cancer
New research suggests that age, race and family history are the biggest risk factors for a man to develop prostate cancer, although high blood pressure, high cholesterol, vitamin D deficiency, inflammation of prostate, and vasectomy also add to the risk.
Prostate cancer is 5 different diseases
Cancer Research UK scientists have for the first time identified that there are five distinct types of prostate cancer and found a way to distinguish between them, according to a landmark study published today in EBioMedicine.
UH Seidman Cancer Center performs first-ever prostate cancer treatment
The radiation oncology team at UH Seidman Cancer Center in Cleveland performed the first-ever prostate cancer treatment April 3 using a newly-approved device -- SpaceOAR which enhances the efficacy of radiation treatment by protecting organs surrounding the prostate.

Related Prostate Cancer Reading:

Best Science Podcasts 2019

We have hand picked the best science podcasts for 2019. Sit back and enjoy new science podcasts updated daily from your favorite science news services and scientists.
Now Playing: TED Radio Hour

Digital Manipulation
Technology has reshaped our lives in amazing ways. But at what cost? This hour, TED speakers reveal how what we see, read, believe — even how we vote — can be manipulated by the technology we use. Guests include journalist Carole Cadwalladr, consumer advocate Finn Myrstad, writer and marketing professor Scott Galloway, behavioral designer Nir Eyal, and computer graphics researcher Doug Roble.
Now Playing: Science for the People

#530 Why Aren't We Dead Yet?
We only notice our immune systems when they aren't working properly, or when they're under attack. How does our immune system understand what bits of us are us, and what bits are invading germs and viruses? How different are human immune systems from the immune systems of other creatures? And is the immune system so often the target of sketchy medical advice? Those questions and more, this week in our conversation with author Idan Ben-Barak about his book "Why Aren't We Dead Yet?: The Survivor’s Guide to the Immune System".