Nav: Home

Major tobacco companies pay almost no corporation tax despite massive profits

February 06, 2019

The world's four major tobacco companies - two of which have HQs in the UK - are paying minimal UK corporation tax despite enormous reported profits, according to findings from new research published in the Journal of Public Health.

The study, authored by researchers at the University of Bath, suggests that the UK needs far better reporting standards for corporation tax in order to hold tobacco companies to account in meeting the enormous public health costs caused by their deadly product.

They call for extension of the bank focused corporation tax surcharge to cover tobacco companies and also for mandated country by country reporting on tobacco sales and profits. The bank focused corporation tax surcharge currently adds an additional 8% tax on the profits of banks.

Previous work from the same authors shows that tobacco companies enjoy inordinate profits on their highly addictive product. Profits have increased over recent years despite declining sales because regular price increases on cigarettes have outpaced people's ability to give up smoking.

For the current study, which set out to identify profit earned and tax paid by the different tobacco companies operating in the UK, the team extracted profit and tax data from company annual financial statements covering 2009 to 2016.

Their work focused on the four big tobacco companies operating in the UK: Imperial Brands and British American Tobacco (BAT) (both headquartered in the UK); and the main UK subsidiaries of Philip Morris International (Philip Morris Limited) and Japan Tobacco International (Gallagher Ltd).

The findings reveal:

The reporting of Corporation Tax and company accounts in the UK is 'wholly inadequate':

-- From 2014, Imperial Brands were allowed to stop reporting UK-adjusted operating profits; BAT and PMI have never done so; and none of the four transnational tobacco companies (TTCs) reported profit before tax in the UK.

-- Companies have reorganised corporate structures to enable profits to be shifted overseas.

The major tobacco companies operating in the UK are not paying Corporation Tax at anything like the rate they should be:

-- In 2016, Imperial Brands, BAT, and Gallagher together made UK operating profits in excess of £1bn yet paid just £83.6m in corporation tax.

-- Over the last 7 years during which time Corporation Tax has varied between 20 - 28%, Imperial Tobacco paid, at most, an estimated effective rate of 13% and often much lower and BAT paid 'virtually no' corporation tax, including four consecutive years from 2011-14 where they paid nothing at all.

UK-based tobacco companies are paying significantly more in Corporation Tax overseas:

-- In 2016, Imperial Brands made £3.5bn in global adjusted operating profits, paying £467m in overseas profit taxation. On their estimated UK earnings for the same period of £937m it paid just £33m in UK corporation tax.

-- In 2016 BAT made £6.2bn in global operating profit before tax, paying £1.4bn in overseas profit taxation. BAT UK earnings could not be determined due to inadequate reporting, but it paid only £7m in UK corporation tax.

Lead author, Dr Rob Branston from the University of Bath School of Management said: "Taxes are the best weapon we have available to reduce the harms caused by smoking, both in terms of encouraging smokers to stop and in recouping the enormous costs to society. But despite the enormous profits these companies enjoy, levels of corporation tax paid are pitiful.

"The government must better hold these companies to account and an essential first step is the publication of accurate country by country information on sales and profits. We urge the government to consider an extension of the bank focused corporation tax surcharge to cover tobacco companies."

Co-author, Professor Anna Gilmore, Director of the Tobacco Control Research Group at the University of Bath and co-Director of STOP (Stopping Tobacco Organisations and Products), the new tobacco industry watchdog, added: "With the NHS under intense funding pressure, these findings need to be acted upon by the Treasury. It is unacceptable that tobacco companies, which are enormously profitable, are not paying for the harm they cause. Until they begin to do so, they remain incentivised to keep selling their uniquely deadly product."

According to recent government analysis the cost of smoking to the economy was £11bn a year to England alone in 2017. In that year, £9.5bn was generated in excise duty from tobacco products in the UK, leaving a deficit of at least £1.5bn, not met by current insufficient Corporation Taxes.

The authors acknowledge that the study is limited by the available public data on tobacco company profitability and tax liabilities/allowances, both globally and for the UK market in particular. The work was supported by a Cancer Research UK grant (C50816/A25745). The funder played no role in the study design, analysis and interpretation of data, writing, or the decision to submit this article for publication.

George Butterworth, Cancer Research UK's policy manager, said: "Preventable diseases caused by tobacco products cost the NHS billions each year. The tobacco industry is dodging its obligation to contribute to the UK tax system leaving the public to pay for clearing up the mess caused by its products. The government should impose a tobacco industry levy, considering a surcharge on corporation tax or other mechanisms, to help fund services to help smokers quit."
-end-
The Tobacco Control Research Group at Bath is a partner of Stopping Tobacco Organisations and Products (STOP). STOP is a new global tobacco industry watchdog whose mission is to expose tobacco industry strategies and tactics that undermine public health.

University of Bath

Related Tobacco Products Articles:

Pictorial warning labels on tobacco products could help improve communication of risks to smokers
In a new study published recently in Tobacco Control, Penn researchers found that health warning labels that include images or Pictorial Warning Labels (PWLs) are more effective in gaining and holding the attention of smokers when the image and the text convey similar risks.
National study looks at tobacco advertising and susceptibility to use tobacco among youth
Among 12- to 17-year-olds who have never used tobacco products, nearly half were considered receptive to tobacco marketing if they were able to recall or liked at least one advertisement, report researchers at University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center and Dartmouth's Norris Cotton Cancer Center, in a new national study.
TCORS study shows effectiveness of testimonial warning labels on tobacco products
New research from the Penn Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science (TCORS) found that cigarette warning labels featuring photos of real smokers who were harmed by their habit are more effective in getting smokers to quit than the text-only labels currently in use.
Flavors influence appeal and use of most tobacco products, especially for youth
In the journal Tobacco Control, researchers report the results of a systematic review of 40 studies completed in the United States and internationally that looked at the impact of non-menthol tobacco flavors on consumers' perceptions and tobacco use behaviors.
Bacteria in smokeless tobacco products may be a health concern
Several species of bacteria found in smokeless tobacco products have been associated with opportunistic infections, according to a paper published Aug.
What's driving the next generation of green products?
If you purchased a Toyota Prius, you may have been driven by the desire to conserve the environment or to save yourself some money at the gas pump.
MD Anderson applauds extension of FDA regulatory authority to all tobacco products
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center fully supports new rules issued by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) today to extend federal regulatory authority to all tobacco products, including electronic cigarettes, cigars, hookah and other previously unregulated tobacco products.
Gone fishin' for natural products, with a new dragnet
Nature contains a treasure trove of substances that could help fight human disease.
Plain packaging effective in reducing misperceptions of tobacco products among Australian Indigenous
Following the introduction of plain packaging on tobacco products in 2012, Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people were 12 percent less likely to think certain tobacco brands were less harmful than others, a new study found.
US forest products in the global economy
Although the United States leads the world in both production and consumption of forest products, the US share of the global forest products market has declined precipitously since the 1990s.

Related Tobacco Products Reading:

Best Science Podcasts 2019

We have hand picked the best science podcasts for 2019. Sit back and enjoy new science podcasts updated daily from your favorite science news services and scientists.
Now Playing: TED Radio Hour

Digital Manipulation
Technology has reshaped our lives in amazing ways. But at what cost? This hour, TED speakers reveal how what we see, read, believe — even how we vote — can be manipulated by the technology we use. Guests include journalist Carole Cadwalladr, consumer advocate Finn Myrstad, writer and marketing professor Scott Galloway, behavioral designer Nir Eyal, and computer graphics researcher Doug Roble.
Now Playing: Science for the People

#529 Do You Really Want to Find Out Who's Your Daddy?
At least some of you by now have probably spit into a tube and mailed it off to find out who your closest relatives are, where you might be from, and what terrible diseases might await you. But what exactly did you find out? And what did you give away? In this live panel at Awesome Con we bring in science writer Tina Saey to talk about all her DNA testing, and bioethicist Debra Mathews, to determine whether Tina should have done it at all. Related links: What FamilyTreeDNA sharing genetic data with police means for you Crime solvers embraced...