Nostalgia safeguards against negative feelings

February 07, 2018

'Make America Great Again' - Donald Trump's campaign slogan resonated deeply with many Americans. Notions of America's greatness and moral superiority have a long tradition and are deeply engrained in the country's culture. Such ideas are often projected into an imagined golden past. But how can this collective nostalgia be reconciled with the many historical wrongs the country has perpetrated?

A new study recently published under the title 'Nostalgia for America's past can buffer collective guilt' in the European Journal of Social Psychology explores the collective yearning for past greatness, and how it contributes to establishing group coherence in the present.

In a series of five studies, Dr Matthew Baldwin, a psychologist at the University of Cologne's Social Cognition Center, and his two colleagues Mark H.

White II (University of Kansas) and Daniel Sullivan (University of Arizona) examined when - and for whom - American collective nostalgia can relieve feelings of collective guilt. 'People who tend to glorify America, seeing it as the best and most moral country in the world, are also particularly nostalgic about America's past', says Baldwin. 'And those who glorify the country's past also tend to portray America as morally superior and to downplay its past wrongdoing. This can alleviate feelings of guilt about things like the Japanese internment camps during World War II', he adds.

In a pilot study and four subsequent studies, the psychologists interviewed approximately 100 to 200 individuals per study. They found out that those who expressed a high level of nostalgia felt lower collective guilt about past wrongs. Moreover, among participants who also glorified America, reminders of American past wrongdoing in turn evoked spontaneous collective nostalgia. Hence it appears that nostalgia serves as a kind of defence against bad feelings and as a resource to raise the coherence and moral standing of the group.

Baldwin and his colleagues are currently exploring how nostalgia serves this purpose: 'Maybe nostalgia leads people to legitimize bad actions as good, or rather allows them to exclude them from what America "really is".' Along with Dr Joris Lammers from the University of Cologne, Baldwin is also looking at whether nostalgia has a general effect of making bad things look good. 'Nostalgia for the past may even give a positive spin to things that are detrimental to society, like smoking indoors', Baldwin notes. 'Overall, nostalgia seems to be a driving force behind many of the things that we believe and do, and while it usually serves the self well, it might sometimes have the opposite effect on the well-being of society as a whole.'

The Social Cognition Center Cologne (SoCCCo) is part of the University of Cologne's Faculty of Human Sciences. It focuses on the psychological study of human social behaviour with an emphasis on underlying social cognitive processes. Ten research groups study a broad array of topics in social cognition, ranging from the dynamics of self-control to the ubiquity of social comparison and the intricacies of processing valenced information.
Original Publication:

Matthew Baldwin, Mark H. White II, Daniel Sullivan. 'Nostalgia for America's past can buffer collective guilt.' European Journal of Social Psychology, 5 January 2018

University of Cologne

Related Guilt Articles from Brightsurf:

Why obeying orders can make us do terrible things
War atrocities are sometimes committed by 'normal' people obeying orders.

Pretrial publicity hinders prosecutors' ability to prove guilt
Study finds media coverage is more likely to influence jurors to vote for acquittal than for conviction.

Survivors' near-miss experiences on 9/11 linked to post-traumatic stress
People who narrowly avoid disaster do not necessarily escape tragedy unharmed, and their knowledge of the victims' fate shapes how survivors respond to traumatic events, according to the results of a new paper by a UB psychologist that explores the effects of near-miss experiences associated with the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

To cheat or not to cheat? Researchers uncover the moral dilemmas of doping
Elite athletes are less likely to take banned substances if they consider the morality of what they are doing, and not just the health consequences of doping, according to a new study led by the University of Birmingham and funded by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA).

Responding to extremist attacks: For Muslim leaders, 'It's damned if you do, damned if you don't'
Muslim leaders face a perilous task when asked to publicly respond to violent attacks carried out by Muslim extremists.

How do we make moral decisions?
When it comes to making moral decisions, we often think of the golden rule: do unto others as you would have them do unto you.

Parental support linked to how well millennials transition to college life
Researchers show that how well parents or guardians support millennials' psychological needs prior to their transition to college is an important predictor of their psychological well-being as they adapt to college life.

Shameful secrets bother us more than guilty secrets
Everyone has secrets, but what causes someone to think about them over and over again?

Study advocates psychological screening for the carers of child burn victims
A new study published in the Journal of Pediatric Psychology highlights the need for psychological screening for families/primary caregivers after a child sustains a burn injury.

Severity of crime increases jury's belief in guilt
A laboratory experiment with 600 mock jurors has found the more severe an alleged crime, the higher a juror's confidence in guilt becomes, regardless of the evidence.

Read More: Guilt News and Guilt Current Events is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to