Nav: Home

Workshop: Getting women due credit -- on the paper

February 11, 2019

Publish or perish is an adage with particular sting for women and other underrepresented scholars prone to not getting deserved credit on scientific papers. Scientists experienced both in this problem's psychology and ethics, as well as in navigating the oft-choppy waters of authorship, will provide perspective and pointers at the upcoming American Association for the Advancement of Science Annual Meeting in Washington, DC.

The career workshop Authorship Decisions: Advocating for Representation will be held from 10-11:30 a.m. Saturday, Feb. 16. It is being organized by a group of Michigan professors - a research ethicist, a historian of science, and two environmental scientists from Michigan State University (MSU), as well as a psychologist at the University of Michigan.

Recent studies indicate that women, and likely scholars from other underrepresented groups, don't always receive appropriate authorship credit for their contributions to scientific papers. This may happen because they are less likely to be the leaders of scientific teams, who hold disproportionate power when creating authorship lists. Biases may also cause other scientists to underestimate the contributions made by authors who come from underrepresented groups.

For example, a recent study found that women in the field of economics who published single-authored papers were just as likely to receive tenure as their male colleagues, but if they published collaborative papers they were less likely to receive tenure than male economists who were similarly collaborative. Other studies have found that women working in some scientific fields are less likely to appear in prestigious lead-author positions, and papers by women are less likely to be cited than those by men.

Because authorship is so central to career advancement, this problem represents a significant barrier to promoting a more diverse workforce.

"The bad news is that early-career scholars, especially those from underrepresented groups, are disadvantaged when they don't receive appropriate credit for their work," said MSU historian of science Georgina Montgomery, "but the good news is that science teams can take steps to improve the situation."

This session will provide practical guidance to both early-career and senior scientists about navigating power dynamics and promoting responsible authorship decisions.

"We are excited about the opportunity to talk with other researchers about how to improve the climate on science teams, making it easier to have difficult conversations about authorship," said MSU environmental scientist Kendra Cheruvelil. "Teams can also develop authorship policies that promote fair practices, and early-career scholars can take steps to clarify their contributions on collaborative papers."

This session emerged from a grant, "Ethical Standards and Practices of Environmental Science Teams: Does Team Diversity Matter?," provided by the National Science Foundation's Cultivating Cultures for Ethical STEM program to the workshop organizers: Kendra Spence Cheruvelil, Kevin Elliott, Georgina Montgomery, and Patricia Soranno from Michigan State University, and Isis Settles from the University of Michigan.
-end-


Michigan State University

Related Scientific Papers Articles:

The first microbial supertree from figure-mining thousands of papers
Recent reports reveal there are more than 114,000,000 published academic papers.
Two papers challenge exclusion of acupuncture in government guidelines
Even as news in the United States recently highlighted the growing inclusion of acupuncture and other complementary and integrative medicine therapies in guidelines for multiple pain conditions, the exclusion of acupuncture in two British governmental guidelines is challenged in a paper and a commentary.
In 4 related papers, researchers describe new and improved tools for stem cell research
In a new paper, a large team of researchers led by senior author Kelly Frazer, Ph.D., professor of pediatrics and director of the Institute for Genomic Medicine at University of California San Diego School of Medicine describe a new collection of 222 systematically derived and characterized iPSC lines generated as part of the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute's NextGen consortium.
Legitimacy of reusing images from scientific papers addressed
Scientific research builds on previous breakthroughs and publications, and yet access to data is often legally restricted.
Scientific societies send 'scientific integrity' letter to President Trump
The American Society of Agronomy (ASA), Soil Science Society of America (SSSA), and the Crop Science Society of America (CSSA) sent an open letter today to President Trump, asking that he 'protect and defend the scientific integrity of federal scientists.'
From the Panama Papers to an intelligence service for your own business
In 2016 more than a hundred newspapers and others published revelations on tax avoidance and evasion.
Journal of Applied Remote Sensing 'best papers' on tech for agriculture, radar, mapping
Outstanding research articles advancing remote sensing technologies for crop management, geologic mapping, and all-weather Earth observation have been recognized with best-paper awards by the Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, published by SPIE, the international society for optics and photonics.
This Week from AGU: Dangerous pollutants, landslides in Japan, and 4 new research papers
This week from AGU are papers on dangerous pollutants, landslides in Japan, and four new research papers from the past week.
This Week from AGU: Erosion by fire, aurora sightings, and 2 new research papers
This week from AGU are articles on erosion by fire, aurora sightings, and two new research papers.
This week from AGU: Volcanic lightning, Texas earthquakes, and 3 new research papers
This week from AGU: research on volcanic lightning, Texas earthquakes, and three new research papers.

Related Scientific Papers Reading:

Best Science Podcasts 2019

We have hand picked the best science podcasts for 2019. Sit back and enjoy new science podcasts updated daily from your favorite science news services and scientists.
Now Playing: TED Radio Hour

Moving Forward
When the life you've built slips out of your grasp, you're often told it's best to move on. But is that true? Instead of forgetting the past, TED speakers describe how we can move forward with it. Guests include writers Nora McInerny and Suleika Jaouad, and human rights advocate Lindy Lou Isonhood.
Now Playing: Science for the People

#527 Honey I CRISPR'd the Kids
This week we're coming to you from Awesome Con in Washington, D.C. There, host Bethany Brookshire led a panel of three amazing guests to talk about the promise and perils of CRISPR, and what happens now that CRISPR babies have (maybe?) been born. Featuring science writer Tina Saey, molecular biologist Anne Simon, and bioethicist Alan Regenberg. A Nobel Prize winner argues banning CRISPR babies won’t work Geneticists push for a 5-year global ban on gene-edited babies A CRISPR spin-off causes unintended typos in DNA News of the first gene-edited babies ignited a firestorm The researcher who created CRISPR twins defends...