Study: Experimental Ebola drug ZMapp may benefit patients, but insufficient data

February 23, 2016

According to initial results from a randomized, controlled trial of the experimental Ebola treatment ZMapp, the monoclonal antibody cocktail was well-tolerated and showed promise. Due to decreasing incidence in Ebola, the study could not enroll enough volunteers to determine definitively whether it is a better treatment for Ebola virus disease (EVD) than supportive care only. Initial findings from the clinical trial known as PREVAIL II were presented today at the Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections in Boston.

ZMapp, developed by Mapp Biopharmaceutical Inc., based in San Diego, is composed of three different laboratory-made antibodies. The PREVAIL II study launched in March 2015 through a clinical research partnership between the Liberian Ministry of Health and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), part of NIH. The study sought to determine if ZMapp plus the optimized standard of care for treating EVD--providing intravenous fluids, balancing electrolytes needed to maintain bodily functions, and maintaining healthy oxygen and blood pressure levels--was superior to the optimized standard of care alone in reducing deaths caused by Ebola virus disease. This collaboration then expanded to include research partners within the countries of Sierra Leone and Guinea as well as the French research organization INSERM.

The trial enrolled 72 adults and children with confirmed Ebola infection from Guinea (12 patients), Liberia (5 patients), Sierra Leone (54 patients) and the United States (1 patient). Investigators originally aimed to enroll 200 participants, but closed enrollment at the end of January 2016 as the West Africa Ebola outbreak ended. All participants received the optimized standard of care, and half were randomly assigned to also receive three intravenous infusions of ZMapp administered three days apart.

Investigators compared the number of deaths in each group at 28 days after enrollment. Of the 71 patients included in the analysis (one patient left treatment), 21 died--an overall fatality rate of nearly 30 percent. Thirteen deaths were reported in the group of 35 patients who received only the optimized standard of care (39 percent), while eight deaths occurred in the ZMapp group of 36 patients (22 percent). The difference was not statistically significant.

Investigators noted that in both groups, having a higher virus level at study entry increased the risk of death. Fifty-three percent (16/30) of patients with high virus levels died versus 12 percent (5/41) of those with lower virus levels. Among those with high virus levels, 60 percent (9/15) receiving standard-of-care only died compared to 47 percent (7/15) of those who also received ZMapp. In the group with lower Ebola virus levels, 20 percent (4/20) receiving only standard-of-care died versus 5 percent (1/21) of those who also received ZMapp. In general, regardless of virus levels, those who received ZMapp appeared to do better, but the results were not statistically significant.

Investigators hope to follow the surviving participants for up to one year to assess any potential medical issues that might be related to EVD or use of ZMapp. In collaboration with NIAID, ASPR's BARDA continues to support the advanced development of Mapp's ZMapp monoclonal antibody therapeutic towards FDA approval.

EVENT: These findings were presented today at the 23rd Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections at the John B. Hynes Veterans Memorial Convention Center in Boston.

WHO: NIAID Director Anthony S. Fauci, M.D., and Richard T. Davey, M.D., deputy director of NIAID's Division of Clinical Research and co-principal investigator of the PREVAIL II trial, are available for comment.

CONTACT: To schedule interviews, please contact Jennifer Routh, (301) 402-1663, jennifer.routh@nih.gov.
-end-
NIAID conducts and supports research--at NIH, throughout the United States, and worldwide--to study the causes of infectious and immune-mediated diseases, and to develop better means of preventing, diagnosing and treating these illnesses. News releases, fact sheets and other NIAID-related materials are available on the NIAID website.

About the National Institutes of Health (NIH): NIH, the nation's medical research agency, includes 27 Institutes and Centers and is a component of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. NIH is the primary federal agency conducting and supporting basic, clinical, and translational medical research, and is investigating the causes, treatments, and cures for both common and rare diseases. For more information about NIH and its programs, visit http://www.nih.gov.

NIH...Turning Discovery Into Health®

NIH/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases

Related Ebola Articles from Brightsurf:

Targeting the shell of the Ebola virus
As the world grapples with COVID-19, the Ebola virus is again raging.

Why doesn't Ebola cause disease in bats, as it does in people?
A new study by researchers from The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston uncovered new information on why the Ebola virus can live within bats without causing them harm, while the same virus wreaks deadly havoc to people.

Ebola transmission risks would be taken more seriously with ground-up interventions
A study led by the University of Kent's Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology (DICE) has found significant differences in disease risk perception and channels of information about Ebola virus disease (EVD) in rural areas and urban centres of Guinea, West Africa.

US inroads to better Ebola vaccine
As the world focuses on finding a COVID-19 vaccine, research continues on other potentially catastrophic pandemic diseases, including Ebola and Marburg viruses.

Ebola antibodies at work
Scientists in Israel and Germany show, on the molecular level, how an experimental vaccine offers long-term protection against the disease.

Half of Ebola outbreaks undetected
An estimated half of Ebola virus disease outbreaks have gone undetected since it was discovered in 1976, according to research published in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Protecting those on the frontline from Ebola
Online training developed at the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) increased the knowledge of health care workers about effective prevention of Ebola up to 19 percent and reduced critical errors to 2.3 percent in a small MUSC cohort.

Another piece of Ebola virus puzzle identified
A team of researchers have discovered the interaction between an Ebola virus protein and a protein in human cells that may be an important key to unlocking the pathway of replication of the killer disease in human hosts.

How the human immune system protects against Ebola
'The current approach for treatment of filovirus infections with antibody cocktails tested in animal models utilizes the principle of targeting of non-overlapping epitopes.

How to slow down Ebola
The phylogenetic tree of the 2013-2016 Ebola epidemic doesn't just tell us how the Ebola virus was able to evolve: it also reveals which events and preventive measures accelerated or slowed down its spread.

Read More: Ebola News and Ebola Current Events
Brightsurf.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.