Nav: Home

Game theory could improve cyberwarfare strategy

March 01, 2017

ANN ARBOR--Whether a nation should retaliate against a cyber attack is a complicated decision, and a new framework guided by game theory could help policymakers determine the best strategy.

The "Blame Game" was developed in part by Robert Axelrod, a University of Michigan political scientist who is well known for solving a version of the classic game theory scenario known as "the prisoner's dilemma." Axelrod is the Walgreen Professor for the Study of Human Understanding at the U-M Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy.

The new study, published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences this week, examines when a victim should tolerate a cyber attack, when a victim should respond--and how. The researchers, including others from the University of Michigan and their colleagues at the University of New Mexico and IBM Research, use historical examples to illustrate how the Blame Game applies to cases of cyber or traditional conflict involving the United States, Russia, China, Japan, North Korea, Estonia, Israel, Iran and Syria.

It is released as the U.S. faces increasing cybersecurity threats, including the recent attacks against the Democratic National Committee and the Chinese theft of databases containing the personal information of 21.5 million federal employees.

"Conflict is increasingly common and severe on the internet today, as governments and corporations have recognized its potential as an instrument of power and control," said Stephanie Forrest, a distinguished professor at the University of New Mexico and an external faculty member at the Santa Fe Institute.

"Unlike nuclear technology, it can be extremely challenging to identify the party responsible for a cyber attack, and this complicates the strategic decision of when to assign blame. Our model elucidates these issues and identifies key parameters that must be considered in formulating a response."

In many cases it may be rational for nations to tolerate cyber attacks, even in the face of strong public criticism.

"You might think you should always publicly blame and retaliate in a cyberwarfare situation," Axelrod said. "But that's not true. The reason it's not is that the attacker may not be vulnerable. It may not matter whether they're blamed or not. And if that's true, you might be in a situation where if you assign blame, your own people would expect you to do something, but there's nothing you can do."

Blame Game offers a series of questions that policymakers can ask as they work through how to respond to a cyber attack. Victims should first ask: Do I know if my attacker is vulnerable? Vulnerability comes in several forms. It could mean a nation is susceptible to a counter cyber attack. It could also mean the attacker is in a difficult geopolitical position and being blamed for a high-profile cyber breach could be detrimental.

If the victim knows that the attacker is vulnerable, the framework moves to the next question: Is the cost of doing nothing higher than the cost of blaming? Nations should always assign blame if the attacker is vulnerable.

Victims can next determine whether to counter attack, switching sides in the game theory model. Questions potential attackers should ask are: Am I vulnerable to blame? If I am, does my intended victim know this? If the answer to either question is no, an attack may be the right option.

While the questions are straightforward, the researchers say the answers are not.

In the cyber domain, assigning blame for an attack or intrusion is complicated both by technical factors and by lack of agreement on basic definitions, such as what constitutes an attack or what counts as critical infrastructure, according to the study.

But the stakes are high.

"It's certainly possible that cyber attacks could be used in a much larger way than we've seen yet," Axelrod said. "It pays to try to understand as much as we can about the incentives and dynamics so we can think about how to prevent them. We hope our model will help policymakers identify gaps in their knowledge and focus on estimating parameters in advance of new cyber attacks."
-end-
The study was funded in part by the National Science Foundation, DARPA and the Santa Fe Institute. In addition to Axelrod and Forrest, other contributors are Benjamin Edwards, a recent Ph.D. in computer science from UNM, now a postdoctoral researcher at IBM Research; and Alexander Furnas, a doctoral student in U-M's Department of Political Science.

University of Michigan

Related Game Theory Articles:

Researchers use game theory to successfully identify bacterial antibiotic resistance
Washington State University researchers have developed a novel way to identify previously unrecognized antibiotic-resistance genes in bacteria.
How random tweaks in timing can lead to new game theory strategies
Most game theory models don't reflect the relentlessly random timing of the real world.
Army game-theory research better allocates military resources, fight cancer
US Army game-theory research using artificial intelligence may help treat cancer and other diseases, improve cybersecurity, deploy Soldiers and assets more efficiently and even win a poker game.
How you and your friends can play a video game together using only your minds
UW researchers created a method for two people help a third person solve a task using only their minds.
Game theory highlights power of local reporting in vaccine decisions
Computational modeling of social networks suggests that vaccination programs are more successful in containing disease when individuals have access to local information about disease prevalence.
How game theory can bring humans and robots closer together
Researchers at the University of Sussex, Imperial College London and Nanyang Technological University in Singapore have for the first time used game theory to enable robots to assist humans in a safe and versatile manner.
How to survive on 'Game of Thrones': Switch allegiances
Characters in the 'Game of Thrones' TV series are more likely to die if they do not switch allegiance, and are male, according to an article published in the open-access journal Injury Epidemiology.
It's a beautiful game, but how you see it is all in the mind...
Researchers from the University of York have used MRI scanning to try and find out how people can have such different takes on football.
Is the key to sparking climate action a game?
New research led by UMass Lowell and published by PLoS ONE found that 81 percent of participants in the World Climate Simulation, a role-playing game of the UN climate talks, showed increased motivation to combat climate change, even among Americans who are free market proponents, a belief strongly linked to denial of human-caused climate change in the United States.
Researchers outline game-theory approach to better understand genetics
Principles of game theory offer new ways of understanding genetic behavior, a pair of researchers has concluded in a new analysis.
More Game Theory News and Game Theory Current Events

Top Science Podcasts

We have hand picked the top science podcasts of 2019.
Now Playing: TED Radio Hour

Risk
Why do we revere risk-takers, even when their actions terrify us? Why are some better at taking risks than others? This hour, TED speakers explore the alluring, dangerous, and calculated sides of risk. Guests include professional rock climber Alex Honnold, economist Mariana Mazzucato, psychology researcher Kashfia Rahman, structural engineer and bridge designer Ian Firth, and risk intelligence expert Dylan Evans.
Now Playing: Science for the People

#540 Specialize? Or Generalize?
Ever been called a "jack of all trades, master of none"? The world loves to elevate specialists, people who drill deep into a single topic. Those people are great. But there's a place for generalists too, argues David Epstein. Jacks of all trades are often more successful than specialists. And he's got science to back it up. We talk with Epstein about his latest book, "Range: Why Generalists Triumph in a Specialized World".
Now Playing: Radiolab

Dolly Parton's America: Neon Moss
Today on Radiolab, we're bringing you the fourth episode of Jad's special series, Dolly Parton's America. In this episode, Jad goes back up the mountain to visit Dolly's actual Tennessee mountain home, where she tells stories about her first trips out of the holler. Back on the mountaintop, standing under the rain by the Little Pigeon River, the trip triggers memories of Jad's first visit to his father's childhood home, and opens the gateway to dizzying stories of music and migration. Support Radiolab today at Radiolab.org/donate.