Nav: Home

Here's how viruses inactivate the immune system, causing cancer

March 01, 2018

It's no new news that viruses cause cancer. For example, human papillomavirus (HPV) causes almost all of the more than 500,000 annual worldwide cases of cervical cancer. This makes sense: By driving the proliferation of infected cells, viruses speed manufacture of more viruses, but excessive cellular proliferation is also a hallmark of cancer. Now a University of Colorado Cancer Center review published in the journal Viruses explores another strategy that viruses use to ensure their own survival, also with the unfortunate byproduct of promoting cancer, namely the viral ability to manipulate the human immune system. This new understanding may help to increase the effectiveness of immune-based therapies against cancer.

"Ultimately, the virus is suppressing the immune system for its own benefit, and promoting the formation and proliferation of cancer cells may be just a side effect of that," says Sharon Kuss-Duerkop, PhD, research instructor working in the lab of CU Cancer Center investigator Dohun Pyeon, PhD.

Interestingly, while viruses certainly have the ability to edit human DNA - most obviously by inserting their own genetic code into DNA so that the new viruses are built alongside DNA replication - the review article explains that viruses do not necessarily turn off the immune system by editing genes. Instead, viruses mute the immune system by epigenetic regulation - instead of changing the actual code of genes, viruses change the degree to which genes are expressed.

They do this by a process called DNA methylation, which, very basically, is a way to silt over parts of the human genome to keep it from being read. In this case, viruses cause methylation of parts of the genome known as DNA promoter regions. Think of these promoter regions like on-off switches for next-door genes - when a promoter region is methylated, the switch is turned off and the gene it controls does not get read and expressed.

"You get lack of access by things that would be driving transcription," Kuss-Duerkop says. In other words, by methylating DNA promoter regions, viruses can turn off genes. But the virus itself doesn't do this - it's not as if viruses creep along a length of DNA spitting out methyl groups onto DNA promoters. Instead, in a Machiavellian twist, viruses recruit human proteins to methylate DNA and thus turn off important other bits of human DNA.

"Viruses encode particular proteins that can in some way modulate DNA methyltransferases," Kuss-Duerkop says, meaning that viruses can cause our own proteins to over-methylate our own DNA.

Of course, it makes sense that viruses would choose to turn off genes that the immune system needs to fight the virus, "like interferon-b, which is a highly anti-viral gene expressed in virtually all cell types; or genes that T cells need to recognize virus-infected cells," Kuss-Duerkop says.

The result is an immune system less able to fight the virus, and, if the virus causes cancer, a "microenvironment" near the tumor in which the immune system is suppressed. In fact, we see this in many cancers - tumors may specifically cloak themselves from the immune system, and they may also suppress the immune system more globally near the places they grow.

Sitting opposite these cancer-causing viruses and their ability to undercut the immune system are doctors and researchers who would like to recruit the immune system to attack cancer. Again: viruses turn down the immune system against the cancers they cause, and doctors would like to turn up the immune system against these same cancers.

And, in fact, these doctors and researchers are finding incredible success with this strategy; for example, PD-1 inhibitors remove this "cloak" that cancers use to hide from the immune system, and CAR-T cell therapies use specially engineered T-cells to seek cancer-specific proteins and destroy the cancer cells to which they are attached.

But challenges to immune-based therapies against cancer remain. Not least among which is the fact that while some patients respond to these therapies, others do not. The answer to increasing the effectiveness of immune therapies, or perhaps at least to choosing which patients are most likely to benefit from immune therapies, may lie in understanding the ways viruses (and cancers themselves) have evolved to evade the immune system.

Maybe if virus-related cancers have methylated DNA promoter regions of immune-related genes, the answer to increasing the effectiveness of immune-based therapies against cancer is to demethylate these genes.

"You don't want to just turn down methylation globally, which would result in over-activation of all genes in the cell, but demethylating some of these gene promoter regions selectively could revive an immune system muted by cancer-causing viruses," Kuss-Duerkop says.

"Ultimately viruses are causing these tumors to form and are further manipulating the immune system to allow tumors to keep growing," Kuss-Duerkop says. "But these same mechanisms may be key in combating tumors with immune-based therapies or in keeping cancer from developing in the first place."
-end-


University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus

Related Cancer Articles:

Cancer mortality continues steady decline, driven by progress against lung cancer
The cancer death rate declined by 29% from 1991 to 2017, including a 2.2% drop from 2016 to 2017, the largest single-year drop in cancer mortality ever reported.
Stress in cervical cancer patients associated with higher risk of cancer-specific mortality
Psychological stress was associated with a higher risk of cancer-specific mortality in women diagnosed with cervical cancer.
Cancer-sniffing dogs 97% accurate in identifying lung cancer, according to study in JAOA
The next step will be to further fractionate the samples based on chemical and physical properties, presenting them back to the dogs until the specific biomarkers for each cancer are identified.
Moffitt Cancer Center researchers identify one way T cell function may fail in cancer
Moffitt Cancer Center researchers have discovered a mechanism by which one type of immune cell, CD8+ T cells, can become dysfunctional, impeding its ability to seek and kill cancer cells.
More cancer survivors, fewer cancer specialists point to challenge in meeting care needs
An aging population, a growing number of cancer survivors, and a projected shortage of cancer care providers will result in a challenge in delivering the care for cancer survivors in the United States if systemic changes are not made.
New cancer vaccine platform a potential tool for efficacious targeted cancer therapy
Researchers at the University of Helsinki have discovered a solution in the form of a cancer vaccine platform for improving the efficacy of oncolytic viruses used in cancer treatment.
American Cancer Society outlines blueprint for cancer control in the 21st century
The American Cancer Society is outlining its vision for cancer control in the decades ahead in a series of articles that forms the basis of a national cancer control plan.
Oncotarget: Cancer pioneer employs physics to approach cancer in last research article
In the cover article of Tuesday's issue of Oncotarget, James Frost, MD, PhD, Kenneth Pienta, MD, and the late Donald Coffey, Ph.D., use a theory of physical and biophysical symmetry to derive a new conceptualization of cancer.
Health indicators for newborns of breast cancer survivors may vary by cancer type
In a study published in the International Journal of Cancer, researchers from the UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center analyzed health indicators for children born to young breast cancer survivors in North Carolina.
Few women with history of breast cancer and ovarian cancer take a recommended genetic test
More than 80 percent of women living with a history of breast or ovarian cancer at high-risk of having a gene mutation have never taken the test that can detect it.
More Cancer News and Cancer Current Events

Trending Science News

Current Coronavirus (COVID-19) News

Top Science Podcasts

We have hand picked the top science podcasts of 2020.
Now Playing: TED Radio Hour

Teaching For Better Humans 2.0
More than test scores or good grades–what do kids need for the future? This hour, TED speakers explore how to help children grow into better humans, both during and after this time of crisis. Guests include educators Richard Culatta and Liz Kleinrock, psychologist Thomas Curran, and writer Jacqueline Woodson.
Now Playing: Science for the People

#556 The Power of Friendship
It's 2020 and times are tough. Maybe some of us are learning about social distancing the hard way. Maybe we just are all a little anxious. No matter what, we could probably use a friend. But what is a friend, exactly? And why do we need them so much? This week host Bethany Brookshire speaks with Lydia Denworth, author of the new book "Friendship: The Evolution, Biology, and Extraordinary Power of Life's Fundamental Bond". This episode is hosted by Bethany Brookshire, science writer from Science News.
Now Playing: Radiolab

Space
One of the most consistent questions we get at the show is from parents who want to know which episodes are kid-friendly and which aren't. So today, we're releasing a separate feed, Radiolab for Kids. To kick it off, we're rerunning an all-time favorite episode: Space. In the 60's, space exploration was an American obsession. This hour, we chart the path from romance to increasing cynicism. We begin with Ann Druyan, widow of Carl Sagan, with a story about the Voyager expedition, true love, and a golden record that travels through space. And astrophysicist Neil de Grasse Tyson explains the Coepernican Principle, and just how insignificant we are. Support Radiolab today at Radiolab.org/donate.