Nav: Home

Beef consumption hurting river quality

March 02, 2020

Across the globe, humans are using freshwater resources faster than those resources can be naturally replenished. In the Western United States, for example, water extractions from the Colorado River have exceeded total river flow, causing rapid depletion of water storage reservoirs. In addition, as these water sources dry up, species of fish, plants and animals are also adversely impacted.

A new study published in Nature Sustainability shows that irrigation of cattle feed crops is the greatest consumer of river water in the Western United States, implicating beef and dairy consumption as the leading driver of water shortages and fish imperilment in the region.

Kyle Davis, assistant professor of Geography and Spatial Sciences and Plant and Soil Sciences, performed the crop water-use estimates for the study. He said the researchers wanted to understand what sectors within the U.S. economy and which crops contributed the most to unsustainable water use, as well as what regions of the United States were most vulnerable to that water loss.

"We looked at agriculture, industry, domestic use, and thermoelectric power generation and quantified what their water demand is on a monthly basis," said Davis. "Then we incorporated those estimates into a national hydrological model to understand how those human water uses within different watersheds in the United States would lead to reduced availability for people and aquatic species downstream."

Irrigation of cattle feed crops is the single largest consumptive user at both regional and national scales, accounting for 23 percent of all water consumption nationally, 32 percent in the Western U.S. and 55 percent in the Colorado River basin.

Alfalfa, for example, is a water-intensive crop that is planted on a large scale to support the beef industry in the Western U.S. In addition, a crop like corn, which on its own is pretty water use efficient, is produced on such a large scale to support the cattle industry that it ends up requiring a lot of unsustainable water use.

After identifying crops and sectors that were contributing to unsustainable water use, the researchers estimated the implications for aquatic species in the Western U.S.

"We made estimates of how many different types of fish species we would expect to have local or global extinctions as a result of this increased water use to support feed production for beef," said Davis.

Sixty fish species in the Western U.S. are at an elevated risk of global extinction due to flow depletion, and 53 of those are primarily due to irrigation of cattle-feed crops.

Summer water flow depletion in particular is responsible for nearly 1,000 instances of increased risk of local extinction of fish species in watersheds in the Western U.S. Of these 1,000 instances, 690 are estimated to have occurred primarily due to irrigation of cattle-feed crops, absent any other water uses.

As far as solutions to the problem go, the research points to fallowing programs, specifically ones that are practiced in a couple of irrigation districts in California.

"The idea is that you pay farmers not to cultivate anything in their field for a particular growing season and the water that they would have applied for irrigation can then be repurposed for other uses," said Davis. "It can be diverted to increase urban water availability or used to increase environmental flows and the water available for natural systems. We've found that fallowing programs are really effective in terms of saving water or effectively repurposing it."

Davis also said that the intent of the study is not to vilify farmers or ranchers, as they are at the heart of the solution to the water challenges.

"We see huge opportunities for farmers and ranchers to be appropriately compensated for helping resolve our water problems and thereby enhancing their incomes and benefiting their communities," said Davis.

The paper also showed how different regions in the U.S are reliant on western beef production to meet their demand. They did this to show that production - and the water resources to support it - often occurs in places geographically removed from where beef is actually consumed, meaning dietary decisions can impact places that are geographically removed from where those foods are actually produced.

In Delaware, consumers are contributing little to water scarcity in the West, as most of the beef in the eastern United States is not sourced from the western states. Beef consumers living in the Los Angeles, Portland, Denver and San Francisco areas, however, consume beef that relies on water resources in places where hydrological and ecological impacts are high.

"Consumers can be made more aware that by eating a lot of beef, they're potentially contributing to unsustainable water use in certain parts of the U.S. More importantly though, this information could be used by corporations and others with control over food supply chains to source beef and cattle feed from places where water is more abundant," said Davis.

Overall, Davis said that he doesn't want to give the impression that all beef is bad, noting that in many places, cattle are important for converting grasses that humans can't eat directly into edible material.

"Cattle play an important role in food security and nutrition, but their environmental impacts can be large. Ensuring that beef and cattle feed are produced in places where water resources are relatively abundant can help to achieve balance between satisfying our diets and protecting the environment," said Davis. "In all, it's good to have knowledge of where your food comes from and what natural resources it requires in order for each person to make more informed food choices."
This study was a multi-institutional effort between researchers at a variety of universities, government agencies, and non-governmental organizations. The lead author on the paper is Brian Richter, president of Sustainable Waters, a global water education organization, and research support for the study was provided by the FEWSION project founded in 2016 by a grant from the Innovations at the Nexus of Food, Energy and Water Systems (INFEWS) program which is sponsored by the National Science Foundation and the United States Department of Agriculture.

University of Delaware

Related Irrigation Articles:

Water-saving alternative forage crops for Texas livestock
With increasing drought conditions in the Texas High Plains, researchers test sorghum and pearl millet as alternatives to corn.
Technology is studied that could save 12% of the energy used in pressurized irrigation
A study, performed in two Andalusian provinces, analyzed the potential of producing electricity by means of recovering hydraulic energy by implanting new technology based on pumps working as turbines
Can oilfield water safely be reused for irrigation in California?
Reusing low-saline oilfield water mixed with surface water to irrigate farms in the Cawelo Water District of California does not pose major health risks, as some opponents of the practice have feared, a study led by Duke University and RTI International researchers finds.
Expansion, environmental impacts of irrigation by 2050 greatly underestimated
New research suggests that the amount of farmland that will need to be irrigated to feed the global population by 2050 could be up to several billion acres, far higher than scientists currently project.
Turned-down temperatures boost crops' penchant for production
Drought and heat put stress on plants and reduce grain yield.
Irrigation alleviates hot extremes
Researchers from ETH Zurich and other universities found evidence that expanding irrigation has dampened anthropogenic warming during hot days, with particularly strong effects over South Asia.
Specifying irrigation needs for container-grown plants
Open-field production of 524,000 irrigated acres of horticultural plants in the United States used 205 billion gallons of water in a recent year.
Water management grows farm profits
A study investigates effects of irrigation management on yield and profit.
Oil and gas wastewater used for irrigation may suppress plant immune systems
A new Colorado State University study gives pause to the idea of using oil and gas wastewater for irrigation.
Rice irrigation worsened landslides in deadliest earthquake of 2018 finds NTU study
Irrigation significantly exacerbated the earthquake-triggered landslides in Palu, on the Indonesian island of Sulawesi, in 2018, according to an international study led by Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (NTU Singapore) scientists.
More Irrigation News and Irrigation Current Events

Trending Science News

Current Coronavirus (COVID-19) News

Top Science Podcasts

We have hand picked the top science podcasts of 2020.
Now Playing: TED Radio Hour

Warped Reality
False information on the internet makes it harder and harder to know what's true, and the consequences have been devastating. This hour, TED speakers explore ideas around technology and deception. Guests include law professor Danielle Citron, journalist Andrew Marantz, and computer scientist Joy Buolamwini.
Now Playing: Science for the People

#576 Science Communication in Creative Places
When you think of science communication, you might think of TED talks or museum talks or video talks, or... people giving lectures. It's a lot of people talking. But there's more to sci comm than that. This week host Bethany Brookshire talks to three people who have looked at science communication in places you might not expect it. We'll speak with Mauna Dasari, a graduate student at Notre Dame, about making mammals into a March Madness match. We'll talk with Sarah Garner, director of the Pathologists Assistant Program at Tulane University School of Medicine, who takes pathology instruction out of...
Now Playing: Radiolab

What If?
There's plenty of speculation about what Donald Trump might do in the wake of the election. Would he dispute the results if he loses? Would he simply refuse to leave office, or even try to use the military to maintain control? Last summer, Rosa Brooks got together a team of experts and political operatives from both sides of the aisle to ask a slightly different question. Rather than arguing about whether he'd do those things, they dug into what exactly would happen if he did. Part war game part choose your own adventure, Rosa's Transition Integrity Project doesn't give us any predictions, and it isn't a referendum on Trump. Instead, it's a deeply illuminating stress test on our laws, our institutions, and on the commitment to democracy written into the constitution. This episode was reported by Bethel Habte, with help from Tracie Hunte, and produced by Bethel Habte. Jeremy Bloom provided original music. Support Radiolab by becoming a member today at     You can read The Transition Integrity Project's report here.