Fueling the US innovation economy: New study shows innovation impacts from federal R&D

March 06, 2015

March 6, 2015, Washington DC-- With policymakers looking for hard evidence to demonstrate the effectiveness of federal programs, a new study of federal patent output by the Battelle Technology Partnership Practice (TPP) provides some new insight into certain federal research programs and their substantial role in generating growth-enhancing innovations.

Patents remain a catalyst for innovation-based job growth, with 75% of executives at venture capital-backed startups reporting that patents are critical for attracting investors. Since startups are responsible for almost all the new jobs created in the United States since 1977, ensuring a robust pipeline of patentable innovations continues to be a top bipartisan priority for net job creation.

According to a new analysis of patent output across various federal agencies from 2000-2013, completed by Battelle TPP, the R&D programs at the National Institutes of Health, the National Science Foundation (NSF), the Department of Energy (DOE) and the National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST) are particularly productive patent generators. Perhaps contrary to widespread beliefs among policymakers, R&D programs from the Department of Defense (DOD) were one of the least efficient at producing new patents from public research dollars.

With spending caps still in place due to the Budget Control Act (BCA) for both non-defense discretionary programs and defense discretionary programs, there have been discussions among members of Congress to cut back on non-defense spending in order to finance increases for defense spending. However, the Battelle report finds that, "most non-defense discretionary programs generated two to five times more patents for every $100 million in research and development funding than defense-related programs. While all research programs are doing laudable work, any shifts in funding from non-defense programs to defense programs should at first assess the aggregate impact on patent output."

"This study clearly shows the drawbacks of sequestration in an evidence-based way," said Reneé Cruea, Executive Director the Academy of Radiology Research. "Just this week before a House Appropriations Subcommittee, we heard the NIH Director acknowledge that other countries are catching up to the U.S. in the race for biotechnology patents. The fastest way to reverse this disturbing trend is to find an alternate fiscal path to the unworkable policy of sequestration, and ensure that we don't have to sacrifice highly innovative programs to finance another."

While innovation outputs across NIH vary depending on mission, goals, etc., the NIH produced an average of 5.9 patents per $100 million in R&D expenditures from 2000-2013 (chart in Executive Summary). NSF was found to produce 10.4 patents per $100 million in research funding, while DOE and NIST averaged approximately 8.7 patents per $100 million. DOD R&D programs averaged 2.5 patents per $100 million.

Overall, two programs at the NIH - the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB) and the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) - were found to be the strongest producers of new intellectual property across all federal R&D programs studied, generating 24.9 and 13.4 patents per every $100 million in R&D respectively, or just $4 million and $7.4 million per invention. (chart page 23 of report)

Notably, NIBIB's rate was nearly as efficient as the private sector, which averages $3.5 million in R&D costs per patent.

Looking at the quality of federal patents - which can be estimated by how far right an agency is on the chart below - NIH patents also averaged 5.14 forward citations. It is important to note that "citations" are not an abstract bibliographical reference used by patent agencies, but rather represent subsequent patent filings that reference the original federal patent as integral to its work.

From a policy perspective, they signify future successful lines of R&D beyond the original federal investment - including millions of dollars of high-skilled job support - which policymakers should view as an important and understudied aspect of innovation policy. According to the report, "this metric may [actually] underestimate the true impact on downstream R&D activity, since it would fail to capture subsequent lines of R&D that did not actually produce an additional patent. While this may have been a failure from the company's perspective, it nevertheless led to high-skilled high-wage employment opportunities - a success from the policy perspective."

Modeling the rate and downstream quality of patent production, the study estimates that the NIH is an integral part of the knowledge chain for $105.9 million in downstream R&D for every $100 million in taxpayer funded awards. These downstream connections represent other research organizations, in both the private and public sector, leveraging NIH discoveries into follow-on R&D spending that is equal to the original federal investment.

NIH's technology-centric Institute, NIBIB, also led the way in total downstream R&D activity across the federal government, generating $578.2 million for every $100 million in R&D expenditures. Other estimates showed that NIST averaged $351.7 million, the NSF averaged $330 million, DOE returned $272.2 million, NHGRI averaged $263.4 million, and the DOD averaged $74.7 million.

"All R&D programs are doing great science; with success rates at historical lows, if you are awarded funding, your colleagues decided through the peer review process that you're doing quality work. So this isn't a question of which programs are the most meritorious," said Cruea. "But if policymakers are interested in generating more high-skilled jobs, they should acknowledge the highly innovative nature and tangible returns from programs such as those at NIH, NSF, NIST, DOE and others, and place them on a predictable and sustainable budget path. That would represent an evidence-based policy to stimulate job creation for decades to come."
Available on the ARR site at: http://online.fliphtml5.com/tfrg/ommz/#p=1 or on the Battelle site at: http://www.battelle.org/docs/tpp/battelle_2015_patents_as_proxies.pdf?sfvrsn=2

Academy of Radiology Research

Related Innovation Articles from Brightsurf:

Food system innovation -- and how to get there
Food production has always shaped the lives of humans and the surface of the Earth.

What is the best way to encourage innovation? Competitive pay may be the answer
Economists and business leaders agree that innovation is a major force behind economic growth, but many disagree on what is the best way to encourage workers to produce the 'think-outside-of-the-box' ideas that create newer and better products and services.

Innovation is widespread in rural areas, not just cities
Conventional measures of innovation suggest that only big cities foster new ideas, but a more comprehensive measure developed at Penn State shows that innovation is widespread even in rural places not typically thought of as innovative.

Scaling up search for analogies could be key to innovation
Investment in research is at an all-time high, yet the rate of scientific breakthroughs isn't setting any records.

Why you should be concerned about Oprah Winfrey when introducing an innovation
New research by Bocconi University's Paola Cillo and Gaia Rubera with Texas A&M's David Griffith asserts that the reaction of large individual investors to innovation is an important component of stock returns, their reaction to innovation depends on their national culture, and there is a way to segment large individual investors and pitch innovation to them accordingly.

Responsible innovation key to smart farming
Responsible innovation that considers the wider impacts on society is key to smart farming, according to academics at the University of East Anglia (UEA).

Pillars of academic innovation
Highlights from the Sixth Annual Conference of the National Academy of Inventors, including high-tech solutions to combat child pornography and radicalization materials; groundbreaking programs to promote STEM major retention; and new materials for wearable technology.

Universities drive innovation in the classroom
The current issue of Technology and Innovation, Journal of the National Academy of Inventors ® (19.2) examines innovation from the university perspective, highlighting what the most innovative institutions and educators worldwide are doing to prepare future engineers and industry leaders to effectively manage IP to grow their companies and the global economy as a whole.

How universities are fostering innovation and entrepreneurship
Technology and Innovation 19.1 zeroes in on innovation and entrepreneurship, with a special focus on what universities are currently doing to foster growth in those areas both for their success and the success of the communities and regions to which they are connected.

Shaping the future of health innovation
Future advances in healthcare will be aided by a new £10 million facility -- the National Institute for Health Research Innovation Observatory based at Newcastle University, UK.

Read More: Innovation News and Innovation Current Events
Brightsurf.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.