Screening mammography for women 40-49 detects more cancers compared with older age groupsMarch 13, 2018
Leesburg, VA, March 13, 2018 - When compared to the screening population ages 50 and over, screening mammography in women ages 40-49 detects 19.3% additional cancers at the expense of an overall 1.5% increase in callbacks and 0.1% in increased biopsies, according to a study to be presented at the ARRS 2018 Annual Meeting, set for April 22-27 in Washington, DC.
The study to be presented by Abid Irshad of the Medical University of South Carolina examined the effectiveness of screening mammography between ages 40-49 in comparison to age groups 50-59 and 60-69. More than 41,000 screening mammography exams were examined for callbacks and recall rate, biopsies performed, cancers detected, and sensitivity and specificity of screening mammography.
Overall, 41,028 mammograms were performed with 5,196 callbacks (12.7% recall rate), 1,164 biopsies, and 326 cancers detected. Women ages 40-49 had 8,913 mammograms, 1,518 callbacks (17% recall rate), 306 biopsies, and 52 cancers detected. Women ages 50-59 had 13,288 mammograms, 1,659 callbacks (12.5% recall rate), 371 biopsies, and 103 cancers detected, while women ages 60-69 had 12,119 mammograms, 1,239 callbacks (10.2% recall rate), 302 biopsies and 89 cancers detected. Overall, the women ages 50 and over had a total of 31,385 mammograms, 3,504 callbacks (11.2% recall rate), 836 biopsies, and 270 cancers detected. By adding the women ages 40-49 to the screening population of 50 and over, the overall callback rate increased 1.5%, the biopsy rate increased 0.1% and 19.3% more cancers were detected.
The study results showed that there was a higher number of callbacks among women ages 40-49 compared to women ages 50-59 (17% compared with 12.5%) and to women ages 60-69 (17% compared with 10.2%). There was also a lower positive biopsy rate among women ages 40-49 compared with women over 50. The number of cancers detected in women ages 40-49 was not significantly different from women ages 50-59 or 60-69.
Founded in 1900, ARRS is the first and oldest radiology society in the United States, and is an international forum for progress in radiology. The Society's mission is to improve health through a community committed to advancing knowledge and skills in radiology. ARRS achieves its mission through an annual scientific and educational meeting, publication of the American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR) and InPractice magazine, topical symposia and webinars, and print and online educational materials. ARRS is located in Leesburg, VA.
American Roentgen Ray Society
Related Mammograms Articles:
The recall rate of screening mammography is reduced when radiologists compare with more than one prior mammogram, a study published in the October 2016 issue of the American Journal of Roentgenology said.
Uninsured women under age 65 were more likely than insured women to experience delays between an initial positive screening mammogram and a diagnostic follow-up.
A new article discusses the evidentiary support for the recent changes made by the American Cancer Society in its recommendations for breast cancer screening.
Longer time spent by film readers interpreting screening mammograms did not result in a reduced rate of breast cancer detection, according to a study appearing in the May 10, 2016 issue of JAMA.
Colonoscopies, mammograms, and childbirth services are the most searched-for medical services when it comes to cost information -- and millennials with higher annual deductible spending are the most frequent comparison shoppers -- according to an analysis of a large national health insurance plan database by researchers from Harvard T.H.
Routine mammography -- widely recommended for breast cancer screening -- may also be a useful tool to identify women at risk for heart disease, potentially allowing for earlier intervention, according to a study scheduled for presentation at the American College of Cardiology's 65th Annual Scientific Session.
Women with a history of a false-positive mammogram result may be at increased risk of developing breast cancer for up to 10 years after the false-positive result.
Researchers have concluded that providing better access to health care may lead to the overuse of mammograms for women who regularly see a primary care physician and who have a limited life expectancy.
Mammograms with false-positive results were associated with increased short-term anxiety for women, and more women with false-positive results reported that they were more likely to undergo future breast cancer screening.
Doctors should focus on life expectancy when deciding whether to order mammograms for their oldest female patients, since the harms of screening likely outweigh the benefits unless women are expected to live at least another decade, according to a review of the scientific literature by experts at UCSF and Harvard medical schools.
Related Mammograms Reading:
Thanks for the Mammogram!: Fighting Cancer With Faith, Hope, and a Healthy Dose of Laughter
by Laura Jensen Walker (Author)
A survivor of breast cancer writes with humor and faith about her struggle with the disease and offers other women hope and advice on how to beat it as well. View Details
No Ma'amograms!: Radical Rethink on Mammograms
by Dr. Ben Johnson (Author)
Written by acclaimed integrative oncologist Ben Johnson, MD, DO, NMD, No Ma’am-ogram! Radical Rethink on Ma'amograms refutes the medical myths and fallacies at the root of today’s conventional breast health care protocols, offering readers safer solutions to breast cancer prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. Dr. Ben discusses the new research behind practical and effective alternatives to harmful mammograms, biopsies, radiation and chemo therapies. His holistic approach includes recommendations on diet, exercise, nutritional supplements, and lifestyle changes to counteract the effects of... View Details
I Flunked My Mammogram!
by Dr. Ernie Bodai (Author), Richard A. Zmuda (Author)
An extremely upbeat and optimistic primer on breast cancer which explains the disease and its treatment options in easy-to-understand terms. View Details
The Mammogram Myth: The Independent Investigation Of Mammography The Medical Profession Doesn't Want You To Know About
by Rolf Hefti
"The Mammogram Myth", the result of an independent investigation by Rolf Hefti, dismantles -error by error- the official medical claims about the value of mammograms, such as that they are very safe, and greatly reduce breast cancer mortality.
This (e)book describes the "inconvenient" research data that has been dismissed and disregarded by the traditional medical profession (such as the true risks of medical radiation). It is the largely ignored but factual scientific evidence against the use of mammograms.
The official medical claims made by orthodox medicine about... View Details
I Flunked My Mammogram! Third Edition, Fully Revised
by M.D., F.A.C.S. Richard A. Zmuda Ernie Bodai (Author)
Wavelet Compression of Satellite-Transmitted Digital Mammograms
by National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) (Author)
Breast cancer is one of the major causes of cancer death in women in the United States. The most effective way to treat breast cancer is to detect it at an early stage by screening patients periodically. Conventional film-screening mammography uses X-ray films which are effective in detecting early abnormalities of the breast. Direct digital mammography has the potential to improve the image quality and to take advantages of convenient storage, efficient transmission, and powerful computer-aided diagnosis, etc. One effective alternative to direct digital imaging is secondary digitization of... View Details
The Women of The Rose: The story of mammograms, miracles and a Texas non-profit that beat all the odds
by Dorothy Gibbons (Author)
Texas women have a well-earned reputation for big hair, big hearts and Texas-sized tenacity. The Women of The Rose is the story of such women -- the kind who didn't let the "little" things like no money, no experience with non-profits, and no breaks in the glass ceiling keep them from launching what has become a 30-year investment in life-saving women's health. In this collection of stories from co-founder Dorothy Gibbons you will discover what it took to face naysayers, build a legacy, and even take on what once was a death sentence for 1000s of women. By the mid 1980s the oil bust had... View Details
Boob in a Box: A Guide for Anyone Having a Mammogram
by A. J. Funstuff (Author)
This inspiring true story is a funny and informative guide to help you deal with your next mammo-squish. Knowledge is power and while in that waiting room, wearing that lovely exam gown, you will be able to handle stress with humor if you read this first. It answers lots of questions like, "What if they want more views?" Read this journey from one who knows that you need to hold your breath...don’t move…OUCH. Breathe. If they don't immediately release you back into the wild, Boob in a Box can help you with all your "what if" thoughts.... View Details
The Big Squeeze: A Social and Political History of the Controversial Mammogram (The Culture and Politics of Health Care Work)
by Dr. Handel Reynolds (Author), Handel E. Reynolds (Author)
In 2009, an influential panel of medical experts ignited a controversy when they recommended that most women should not begin routine mammograms to screen for breast cancer until the age of fifty, reversing guidelines they had issued just seven years before when they recommended forty as the optimal age to start getting mammograms. While some praised the new recommendation as sensible given the smaller benefit women under fifty derive from mammography, many women's groups, health care advocates, and individual women saw the guidelines as privileging financial considerations over women's... View Details
The Truth About Your Mammogram: Is Your Mammogram Killing You? An Interview With Dr. Len Saputo
by Michael Senoff
According to Dr. Len Saputo, physician and author of Return To Healing, doctors have to conduct 1,900 mammograms in order to save one life. But, they will cause two cancers from the mammogram’s radiation in the process. And they will misdiagnose 30% of the people, meaning many women will receive unnecessary and costly surgeries, radiation and chemotherapy. So, even more will die from those. But here’s the hardest pill to swallow.
For women under age 50, mammograms aren’t necessary. And in this audio, you’ll get the real facts from Dr. Saputo, who says you probably won’t... View Details