Magnesium In CPR Benefits Brains, Not Hearts

March 18, 1997

ANAHEIM, Calif. -- Researchers have discovered that the use of magnesium during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) appears to benefit the brains of patients, not their hearts.

Physicians at Duke University Medical Center found that an injection of magnesium during CPR does not help restart the heart, as was commonly believed, but seemed to protect neurological functioning in those who recovered.

They said in a report prepared for presentation Monday at the annual meeting of the American College of Cardiology that in this study, 69 percent of patients who were resuscitated through CPR and received magnesium had escaped brain damage and were able to return home compared to 39 percent of patients who didn't have the therapy. In that group, three times as many patients had to go to nursing homes or required skilled assistance.

"This is not what we expected, but we are intrigued with the results," said cardiologist Dr. Christopher O'Connor, who led the study with cardiologist Dr. Mark Thel. "This may be serendipity at its best. Perhaps magnesium could be used in other ways, such as therapy for stroke patients," O'Connor said.

The trial, called MAGIC (Magnesium in Cardiac Arrest) is the first randomized, placebo controlled trial done on CPR patients, Thel said. It was funded by Duke, which has specialized in the study of CPR, and conducted at Duke Hospital.

Although the American Heart Association recommended in 1992 that patients receive an injection of magnesium while undergoing CPR, use of the mineral during the procedure has never been studied, Thel said. "The only trials done were early ones that showed improved survival in patients with a heart attack, and the thinking was that such cardioprotective benefits would extend to CPR." Magnesium is thought to dilate coronary arteries, inhibit platelet activity so that clots can't form, and prevent calcium from flowing into heart cells, he said.

The researchers thought that a bit more magnesium than currently given might save more lives during CPR, but in order to test such a hypothesis they first had to see what effect the usual dose of magnesium had on patients. They designed a study that compared standard magnesium sulfate therapy during CPR to no magnesium therapy (placebo) at all. During the two-year trial, 76 patients were randomly assigned to receive intravenous magnesium and 80 patients received a placebo.

They found that, in fact, more patients with placebo therapy were resuscitated and lived 24 hours, but the difference was not statisticsally significant. They also determined there was no difference at all in ultimate survival. For patients receiving magnesium, 54 percent were successfully resuscitated, 43 percent survived 24 hours and 21 percent were ultimately discharged from the hospital. The corresponding rates in the placebo group were 60 percent, 50 percent and 21 percent.

But they did find a difference in an assessment of neurological outcome at the time the patients left the hospital. Patients who received magnesium scored an average of 70 on the Karnofsky performance scale, a commonly used quality-of-life test, compared to 40 in the group that received a placebo. The researchers also determined that more patients who received magnesium therapy were capable of independent living (69 percent), compared to 35 percent of patients receiving a placebo.

"This seems to offer a good case that magnesium should continue to be offered during CPR, but not for the reasons we anticipated," said O'Connor. "It appears to be neuroprotective, perhaps by stopping calcium from flowing into brain cells and destroying them, but more trials need to be conducted to determine how and why it works."

Working with O'Connor and Thel on the study were physician Dr. Robert Califf, nurse Ann Louise Armstrong and statistician Steven McNulty.

Duke University

Related Placebo Articles from Brightsurf:

Effect of fluvoxamine vs placebo on clinical deterioration in outpatients with symptomatic COVID-19
This randomized trial compares the effects of fluvoxamine, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor with immunomodulatory effects, versus placebo on a composite of dyspnea or pneumonia and oxygen desaturation among adult outpatients with polymerase chain reaction-confirmed mild COVID-19 illness.

Hydroxychloroquine no more effective than placebo in preventing COVID-19
Clinical trial with COVID-19 testing of participants shows health care workers in contact with coronavirus patients who took hydroxychloroquine each day did not reduce their rate of infection.

Compared to placebo, vitamin D has no benefit for severe asthma attacks
Contrary to earlier observational results, vitamin D supplements do not prevent severe asthma attacks in at-risk children, according to the first placebo-controlled clinical trial to test this relationship.

UMN trial shows hydroxychloroquine has no benefit over placebo in preventing COVID-19
Today, University of Minnesota Medical School researchers published the results from the first randomized clinical trial testing hydroxychloroquine for the post-exposure prevention of COVID-19.

The placebo effect and psychedelic drugs: tripping on nothing?
A new study from McGill suggests that, in the right context, some people may experience psychedelic-like effects from placebos alone.

Methotrexate reduces joint damage progression over placebo in erosive hand OA
According to new research findings presented at the 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting, methotrexate did not demonstrate superior efficacy over placebo for pain relief and function evolution at three and 12 months in patients with erosive hand osteoarthritis, but did significantly reduce the progression of joint damage over placebo and seems to facilitate bone remodeling in these patients.

Botulinum toxin reduces chronic migraine attacks, compared to placebo
A growing body of evidence supports the effectiveness of botulinum toxin injections in reducing the frequency of chronic migraine headaches, concludes an updated review and analysis in the January issue of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, the official medical journal of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS).

Opioids vs. placebo, nonopioid alternatives for chronic noncancer pain
An estimated 50 million adults in the United States were living with chronic noncancer pain in 2016 and many of them were prescribed opioid medications, even though a clinical benefit is uncertain.

Probiotic no better than placebo for acute gastroenteritis in children
While probiotics are often used to treat acute gastroenteritis (also known as infectious diarrhea) in children, the latest evidence shows no significant differences in outcomes, compared to a placebo.

Most common shoulder operation is no more beneficial than placebo surgery
In a landmark study published this week in the BMJ, Finnish researchers show that one of the most common surgical procedures in the Western world is probably unnecessary.

Read More: Placebo News and Placebo Current Events is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to