Adverse effects, quality of life of treatment vs. no treatment for men with localized prostate cancer

March 21, 2017

Two studies published by JAMA examine the adverse effects and quality of life as reported by men with localized prostate cancer who chose treatment, observation or active surveillance.

In one study, Daniel A. Barocas, M.D., M.P.H., of Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, and colleagues included 2,550 men (average age, 64 years) with localized prostate cancer who received treatment with radical prostatectomy (n=1,523; 60 percent), external beam radiation therapy (EBRT; n=598; 24 percent), or chose active surveillance (n=429; 17 percent). Patient-reported outcomes were collected via survey at enrollment and 6, 12, and 36 months after enrollment.

The researchers found that radical prostatectomy was associated with a greater decrease in sexual function and urinary incontinence than either EBRT or active surveillance after three years and was associated with fewer urinary irritative symptoms than active surveillance; however, no meaningful differences existed in either bowel or hormonal function beyond 12 months or in other domains of health-related quality-of-life measures.

"This information may facilitate patient counseling regarding the expected harms of contemporary treatments and their possible effect on quality of life," the authors write.

To read the full study, please visit the For The Media website.

In another study, Ronald C. Chen, M.D., M.P.H., of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and colleagues included 1,141 men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer to compare quality of life (QOL) after radical prostatectomy (n=469; 41 percent), external beam radiotherapy (n= 249; 22 percent), and brachytherapy (n=109; 9.6 percent) vs active surveillance (n=314; 28 percent). Median age was 66 to 67 years across groups. Quality of life was assessed by surveys at baseline (pretreatment) and 3, 12, and 24 months after the treatment date, with scores given on measures of function of various domains.

The researchers found that compared with active surveillance, average sexual dysfunction scores worsened by three months for patients who received radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy, and brachytherapy. Compared with active surveillance at three months, worsened urinary incontinence was associated with radical prostatectomy; acute worsening of urinary obstruction and irritation with external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy; and worsened bowel symptoms with external beam radiotherapy. By 24 months, average scores between treatment groups vs active surveillance were not significantly different in most domains.

"These findings can be used to promote treatment decisions that incorporate individual preferences," the authors write.

To read the full study, please visit the For The Media website.
-end-
Editor's Note: Please see the articles for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.

Related material: The editorial, "Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Treatment for Localized Prostate Cancer," by Freddie C. Hamdy, M.D., F.Med.Sci., of the University of Oxford, U.K., and Jenny L. Donovan, Ph.D., F.Med.Sci., of the University of Bristol, U.K., also is available at the For The Media website.

To place an electronic embedded link to these studies in your story These links will be live at the embargo time:

http://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/10.1001/jama.2017.1704http://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/10.1001/jama.2017.1652

The JAMA Network Journals

Related Brachytherapy Articles from Brightsurf:

Outcomes of salvage low dose RT brachytherapy after EBRT for prostate cancer
Researchers involved in the phase II NRG Oncology RTOG 0526 trial studying low dose rate (LDR) prostate brachytherapy (BT) following local recurrence (LR) after external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for patients with low-to-intermediate risk prostate cancer reported late Grade 3 gastrointestinal and genitourinary adverse events (AEs) occurring in 14% of trial participants.

Brachytherapy proves effective in treating skin cancer
The use of high-dose-rate brachytherapy to treat elderly patients with common skin cancers offers excellent cure rates and cosmetic outcomes, according to a new study.

Aesthetics of skin cancer therapy may vary by treatment type
In a meta-analysis of 58 studies, a study led by Penn State compared four types of skin cancer treatments and found that while all four had similar recurrence rates a year after treatment, a form of radiation called brachytherapy and a type of surgery called Mohs micrographic surgery had better cosmetic results.

Single dose of targeted radiotherapy is safe and effective for prostate cancer
A single high dose of radiation that can be delivered directly to the tumor within a few minutes is a safe and effective technique for treating men with low-risk prostate cancer, according to a study presented at the ESTRO 38 conference.

Benefit of LDR brachytherapy in patients with early-stage prostate cancer is still unclear
Even eleven years after the first benefit assessment, the evidence base remains inadequate.

PROs indicate brachytherapy alone is the superior treatment
Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) from the NRG Oncology trial RTOG 0232 comparing a combined treatment of external beam therapy and brachytherapy (EBT+B) to transperineal interstitial permanent brachytherapy (B) alone indicate a significantly different clinician and patient-reported late toxicity profile between arms despite similarities in progression-free survival results.

Brachytherapy for cervical cancer does not increase the risk of ureteral stricture
New research presented at the ESTRO 37 conference from two large international trials, shows that intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy is safe and does not increase the risk of ureteral stricture in cervical cancer patients.

VCU scientists seek to perfect calculations for comparing cervical cancer radiation doses
Research from VCU Massey Cancer Center has found that one of the standard practices for comparing cervical cancer radiation therapy treatments may be misleading, and the use of an alternative mathematical formula could be used to more effectively predict and potentially improve outcomes for patients.

A gold-standard cancer treatment is in decline, and money may be why
Offering brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer ends up costing hospitals money, potentially explaining its declining use even though it's considered the most effective treatment.

Cleveland Clinic leads development of new guidelines for radiation in breast cancer
Cleveland Clinic researcher Chirag Shah, M.D., led the development of updated guidelines for the appropriate and safe utilization of accelerated partial-breast irradiation (APBI).

Read More: Brachytherapy News and Brachytherapy Current Events
Brightsurf.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.