Nav: Home

Concerns regarding proposed changes to EPA's causality framework

March 21, 2019

In this Policy Forum, Gretchen Goldman and Francesca Dominici raise concerns over recent developments at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) that "stand to quietly upend the time-tested and scientifically backed process the agency relies on to protect the public from ambient air pollution." Goldman and Dominici cite proposed changes to how the EPA handles causality between air pollutants and health effects. An alternative approach to causality in this context, called manipulative causation, is being promoted by Tony Cox, the current chair of the EPA Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee (CASAC). The CASAC provides independent advice to the EPA Administrator. As CASAC Chair, Cox will oversee the committee's development of a scientific recommendation to the EPA administrator on whether a new ambient particulate matter standard should be set in order to protect public health in the U.S. Cox's proposed approach here, the authors explain, argues that in order to inform causality, data must pass the test of manipulative causation; the assumption of this framework is that implementing a new, more stringent air quality standard must measurably change health outcomes, and unless there is direct evidence of this, the regulatory action shouldn't be taken. The framework further argues that epidemiological studies only provide evidence of an association between exposure to air pollution and health effects - that they don't show causation. Cox's approach calls for several tests of causality, including those that rely on machine learning. "Although, in principle, the concept of manipulative causation can be viewed as attractive," the Policy Forum authors write, "in reality, this requirement is unattainable in the context of observational data of air pollution and health." The authors cite several reasons why, also suggesting the rate at which this approach is trying to be standardized is concerning. They conclude by saying the philosophy proposed is contrary to the overarching idea that to protect public health, we should err on the side of protecting people. "Importantly," they conclude, "if the particulate matter and ozone standards are loosened, people will suffer the consequences." The matters discussed in the Policy Forum will be explored at a meeting on 28 March.
-end-


American Association for the Advancement of Science

Related Air Pollution Articles:

Air pollution may disrupt sleep
High levels of air pollution over time may get in the way of a good night's sleep, according to new research presented at the ATS 2017 International Conference.
Smoking out sources of in-home air pollution
An ambitious study led by San Diego State University researchers has investigated various factors that contribute to air pollution inside the house.
Cities need to 'green up' to reduce the impact of air pollution
The harmful impact of urban air pollution could be combated by strategically placing low hedges along roads in a built-up environment of cities instead of taller trees, a new study has found.
Study measures air pollution increase attributable to air conditioning
A new University of Wisconsin-Madison study shows that the electricity production associated with air conditioning causes emissions of sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides and carbon dioxide to increase by hundreds to thousands of metric tons, or 3 to 4 percent per degree Celsius (or 1.8 degrees Fahrenheit).
Air pollution may lead to dementia in older women
Tiny air pollution particles -- the type that mainly comes from power plants and automobiles -- may greatly increase the chance of dementia, including Alzheimer's disease.
Where is heavy air pollution in Beijing from?
The heavy haze formation in Beijing is depicted as 'initiated by the regional transport mainly from the coal burning in surrounding areas, and intensified by the local secondary formation originated from the motor vehicles.'
Future PM2.5 air pollution over China
There is a long way to go to mitigate future PM2.5 pollution in China based on the emission scenarios.
Salty snow could affect air pollution in the Arctic
In pictures, the Arctic appears pristine and timeless with its barren lands and icy landscape.
Diabetes: Risk factor air pollution
Exposure to air pollution at the place of residence increases the risk of developing insulin resistance as a pre-diabetic state of type 2 diabetes.
Air pollution exposure may worsen lupus in children
The results of a study presented today at the European League Against Rheumatism Annual Congress (EULAR 2016) show for the first time that an individual's exposure to air pollution may have a direct role in triggering disease activity as well as airway inflammation in children and adolescents with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Related Air Pollution Reading:

Best Science Podcasts 2019

We have hand picked the best science podcasts for 2019. Sit back and enjoy new science podcasts updated daily from your favorite science news services and scientists.
Now Playing: TED Radio Hour

Moving Forward
When the life you've built slips out of your grasp, you're often told it's best to move on. But is that true? Instead of forgetting the past, TED speakers describe how we can move forward with it. Guests include writers Nora McInerny and Suleika Jaouad, and human rights advocate Lindy Lou Isonhood.
Now Playing: Science for the People

#527 Honey I CRISPR'd the Kids
This week we're coming to you from Awesome Con in Washington, D.C. There, host Bethany Brookshire led a panel of three amazing guests to talk about the promise and perils of CRISPR, and what happens now that CRISPR babies have (maybe?) been born. Featuring science writer Tina Saey, molecular biologist Anne Simon, and bioethicist Alan Regenberg. A Nobel Prize winner argues banning CRISPR babies won’t work Geneticists push for a 5-year global ban on gene-edited babies A CRISPR spin-off causes unintended typos in DNA News of the first gene-edited babies ignited a firestorm The researcher who created CRISPR twins defends...