Nav: Home

Umbralisib shows early promise for patients with marginal zone lymphoma

April 01, 2019

ATLANTA -- The investigational therapeutic umbralisib, which targets the molecule PI3K-delta, was well tolerated and highly active in patients with relapsed/refractory marginal zone lymphoma, according to early results from the UNITY-NHL phase II clinical trial, which were presented at the AACR Annual Meeting 2019, March 29-April 3.

As of October 20, 2018, 55 percent of patients who had at least six months of follow-up had a partial or complete response following umbralisib treatment. The median duration of response had not been reached. Updated data will be presented at the meeting, according to Nathan H. Fowler, MD, associate professor of medicine and director of clinical research in the Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.

In January 2019, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted umbralisib breakthrough therapy designation for the treatment of adults with marginal zone lymphoma who have received at least one anti-CD20 treatment. Breakthrough therapy designation is an FDA strategy to expedite assessment of therapeutics for life-threatening diseases such as cancer.

"Marginal zone lymphoma is an uncommon, slow-growing type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma," said Fowler. "Rituximab, either alone or in combination with chemotherapy, has improved outcomes for patients, but in most cases the disease eventually relapses, and these individuals have limited treatment options.

"Umbralisib is a small-molecule inhibitor that targets PI3K-delta, which is a component of a signaling pathway that has a key role in promoting the survival and expansion of many types of cells, and has also been shown to uniquely inhibit CK1 epsilon," continued Fowler. "Our exciting results suggest that this oral targeted therapeutic has significant activity against relapsed/refractory marginal zone lymphoma and offers hope for patients."

As of October 20, 2018, 69 patients with relapsed/refractory marginal zone lymphoma had been enrolled on the trial and received 800 milligrams of umbralisib orally once daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. At that time, 38 patients had at least six months of follow-up.

Among the 38 patients, the median follow-up time was 9.6 months. Four had a complete response and 17 had a partial response, as assessed by the investigators, for an overall response rate of 55 percent. An additional 11 patients had stable disease, for a clinical benefit rate (complete response, partial response, and stable disease) of 84 percent. Progression-free survival at 12 months was 71 percent.

The most common adverse event of any grade was diarrhea, which affected 45 percent of the 38 patients. Nausea, fatigue, headache, cough, and decreased appetite affected between 20 percent and 30 percent of patients. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and diarrhea, which affected 8 percent, 5 percent, and 5 percent of the 38 patients, respectively. No events of colitis or pneumonitis had been reported.

"All the adverse events we have seen in the trial are to be expected with this class of drugs," said Fowler. "Moreover, we were able to manage the side effects for the patients, making umbralisib a well-tolerated treatment.

"The adverse event and clinical activity data are highly encouraging at this early timepoint," added Fowler. "We are excited to continue following patients for a longer time to further establish the long-term activity and side effects of umbralisib. With the results reported so far, umbralisib has the potential to make a real difference for patients with relapsed/refractory marginal zone lymphoma."

According to Fowler, the main limitations of the data presented are that it was based on a small number of patients and a short follow-up time.
This study was funded by TG Therapeutics. Fowler serves on scientific advisory boards for TG Therapeutics, Bayer, Gilead Sciences, and Verastem Oncology; he also receives research funding from TG Therapeutics.

American Association for Cancer Research

Related Side Effects Articles:

Proton therapy for cancer lowers risk of side effects
Proton therapy results in fewer side effects than traditional X-ray radiation therapy for many cancer patients, according to a new study led by Washington University School of Medicine in St.
What are the neurological side effects of CAR T-cell therapy?
A team at Brigham and Women's Hospital recently cataloged the neurological symptoms of patients who had received CAR T-cell therapy to better understand its neurotoxic side effects.
Using 3D models to reduce side effects of radiotherapy
The debilitating side effects of radiotherapy could soon be a thing of the past thanks to a breakthrough by University of South Australia (UniSA) and Harvard University researchers.
Side-effects not fully reported in more than 30 percent of healthcare reviews
The potential side-effects of health interventions were not fully reported in more than a third of published health study reviews, research at the University of York has shown.
How drugs can minimize the side effects of chemotherapy
Researchers at the University of Zurich have determined the three-dimensional structure of the receptor that causes nausea and vomiting as a result of cancer chemotherapy.
More Side Effects News and Side Effects Current Events

Best Science Podcasts 2019

We have hand picked the best science podcasts for 2019. Sit back and enjoy new science podcasts updated daily from your favorite science news services and scientists.
Now Playing: TED Radio Hour

Erasing The Stigma
Many of us either cope with mental illness or know someone who does. But we still have a hard time talking about it. This hour, TED speakers explore ways to push past — and even erase — the stigma. Guests include musician and comedian Jordan Raskopoulos, neuroscientist and psychiatrist Thomas Insel, psychiatrist Dixon Chibanda, anxiety and depression researcher Olivia Remes, and entrepreneur Sangu Delle.
Now Playing: Science for the People

#537 Science Journalism, Hold the Hype
Everyone's seen a piece of science getting over-exaggerated in the media. Most people would be quick to blame journalists and big media for getting in wrong. In many cases, you'd be right. But there's other sources of hype in science journalism. and one of them can be found in the humble, and little-known press release. We're talking with Chris Chambers about doing science about science journalism, and where the hype creeps in. Related links: The association between exaggeration in health related science news and academic press releases: retrospective observational study Claims of causality in health news: a randomised trial This...