No US commercial laboratories fully meet guidance for noninvasive prenatal screening

April 02, 2019

An analysis of the reports and materials provided by commercial laboratories offering noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) for genetic disorders finds that none of them fully meet the recommendations published by the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). The report from a team of specialists in medical genetics is being published in the journal Genetics in Medicine, the official peer-reviewed journal of the ACMG.

"It's been more than two years since the ACMG published its recommendations about NIPS, and we could not find a single commercial lab in the U.S. that adhered to all of the recommendations," says Brian Skotko, MD, MPP, of the Division of Medical Genetics at MassGeneral Hospital for Children, corresponding author of the paper. The ACMG position statement includes guidance to laboratories on the test reports used by clinicians and expectant parents.

"Incomplete or inaccurate reporting can lead to confusion and improper counseling," Skotko says. "The ACMG was clear that laboratories should not offer screening when some of their recommendations were not met, so I think our findings will be concerning to clinicians and expectant parents trying to identify quality NIPS reporting in today's marketplace."

NIPS testing analyzes a blood sample from an expectant mother for DNA fragments derived from the placenta, which can reveal genetic or chromosomal conditions in a fetus. The most commonly screened-for disorders include Down syndrome, caused by an extra copy of chromosome 21; other "trisomies" involving chromosomes 13 or 18; and extra or missing copies of the X or Y sex chromosomes. NIPS has the highest detection rate and lowest false positive rate of any screening test used for these conditions. However, NIPS is a screening test, and false positive and negative results are known to occur at rates that can vary depending on the specific condition being screened.

Among its recommendations, the ACMG specified five statistics that should be reported for each screened-for condition: "Parents deserve to know how likely their positive screening result is to be a true positive," Skotko explains. "Parents' decision to have the NIPS test - and how they respond after a positive result - may hinge on their understanding of PPV and NPV."

The ACMG recommendations also limited the number of conditions for which screening should be offered, specified that test results be provided in ways that help parents and providers understand the findings and make decisions, and called upon labs to direct parents and providers to resources providing additional education and support when test results are positive.

"By electing NIPS, expectant couples can receive an early indication of the chance their fetus might have a condition such as Down syndrome," says Skotko, who is director of the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) Down Syndrome Program. "For highly suggestive results, they might elect to pursue more definitive diagnostic testing, such as amniocentesis. When a diagnosis becomes definitive, couples have the option of terminating the pregnancy, making arrangements for adoption, or beginning to prepare for raising their child. Many couples choose to learn more through reading and meeting other families during the prenatal period so they feel well prepared for the birth."

The team's consensus-based analysis of test results and patient education materials provided by 10 commercial laboratories offering NIPS found considerable inconsistencies and inadequacies in reporting the full range of ACMG-reported statistics. Overall, while all of them met some of the ACMG recommendations, none met them all.

"Our study can't tell us why labs are choosing not to meet all the ACMG recommendations," says Skotko, the Emma Campbell Endowed Chair on Down Syndrome at MGH and an associate professor of Pediatrics at Harvard Medical School. "Laboratories have been very quick to capitalize on the ACMG position that all pregnant women be informed about the availability of NIPS testing, but they have been selective about the other recommendations. It's true that some recommendations may need updating - such as the fact that reporting a PPV for a negative test result doesn't make sense and that PPV might not be easily calculated for some chromosomal conditions - but we hope our findings will soon become outdated as companies begin to adhere to more of the ACMG recommendations."

He adds, "We hope our paper encourages laboratories to revise their reports to include patient resources and test metric data that can help physicians and obstetric care providers help their patients make informed decisions based on accurate information."

As a resource for providers and parents, Skotko and his collaborators in the Prenatal Research Information Consortium have published and will regularly update a chart showing individual laboratories' compliance with the ACMG recommendations, freely accessible here:

Skotko adds, "The ACMG recommendations state that labs should support the educational and access needs of parents and providers, and while half the labs made good faith efforts to meet our criteria, around half did not recommend any specific resources. Expectant families deserve to make informed choices, but they will struggle to do so without access to quality resources and information such as those recommended by ACMG."
The co-authors of the Genetics in Medicine report are Megan Allyse, PhD, Mayo Clinic; Komal Bajaj, MD, MS-HPEd, and Susan Klugman, MD, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine; Robert Best, PhD, University of South Carolina School of Medicine Greenville; Mark Leach, JD, MA, and Stephanie Meredith, MA, University of Kentucky; Marsha Michie, PhD, Case Western Reserve School of Medicine; Katie Stoll, MS, Genetic Support Foundation; and Anthony Gregg, MD, MBA, Baylor University Medical Center.

Massachusetts General Hospital, founded in 1811, is the original and largest teaching hospital of Harvard Medical School. The MGH Research Institute conducts the largest hospital-based research program in the nation, with an annual research budget of more than $925 million and major research centers in HIV/AIDS, cardiovascular research, cancer, computational and integrative biology, cutaneous biology, genomic medicine, medical imaging, neurodegenerative disorders, regenerative medicine, reproductive biology, systems biology, photomedicine and transplantation biology. The MGH topped the 2015 Nature Index list of health care organizations publishing in leading scientific journals and earned the prestigious 2015 Foster G. McGaw Prize for Excellence in Community Service. In August 2018 the MGH was once again named to the Honor Roll in the U.S. News & World Report list of "America's Best Hospitals."

Massachusetts General Hospital

Related Parents Articles from Brightsurf:

Why do so many parents avoid talking about race?
BU social psychologists share ways adults can overcome their own assumptions and discomfort to talk honestly about race with children.

Teens who think their parents are loving are less likely to be cyberbullies
Adolescents who perceive their parents to be loving and supportive are less likely to engage in cyberbullying, according to a new study by researchers at NYU Rory Meyers College of Nursing.

Is spanking of children by parents less common?
ChangesĀ over 25 years in how common spanking of children was by parents in the United States are examined in this study.

Parents twice as likely to be concerned about ticks than of mosquitoes
When it comes to bug bites, parents are twice as likely to be concerned about ticks as they are about mosquitoes transmitting disease, a new national poll finds.

Older beetle parents 'less flexible'
Older parents are less flexible when it comes to raising their offspring, according to a new study of beetles.

Marijuana use may not make parents more 'chill'
Sorry, marijuana moms and dads: Using pot may not make you a more relaxed parent, at least when it comes to how you discipline your children.

Becoming new parents increases produce purchases
In the United States, both children and adults eat too few fruits and vegetables, which puts them at risk for poor diet quality and adverse health consequences.

Why parents should teach their kids to give
Teaching children how to appropriately give money away can help them develop valuable financial skills such as budgeting, and it may also contribute to their well-being later in life, according to a study led by the University of Arizona.

Parents unknown
Animals in hard-to-reach places, especially strange, 'unattractive,' animals, may completely escape our attention.

Most parents say hands-on, intensive parenting is best
Most parents say a child-centered, time-intensive approach to parenting is the best way to raise their kids, regardless of education, income or race.

Read More: Parents News and Parents Current Events is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to