Nav: Home

Massachusetts parental consent law leads to delays for minors seeking abortions

April 09, 2019

Massachusetts is among 37 states in the U.S. that currently mandate parental consent or notification before a minor is provided with abortion care. Minors who have a poor relationship with their parents or face other barriers to informing a parent or legal guardian may circumvent the consent requirement through a hearing with a judge (a judicial bypass hearing), but few studies have examined the impact that this process may have on delaying care. A new study published in Obstetrics and Gynecology led by investigators from Brigham and Women's Hospital addresses this question, using a retrospective cohort to quantify abortion delays associated with the judicial bypass process.

"Our study looks at the implications of a law that's been on the books for over 30 years in Massachusetts and requires a person under 18 to have parental consent before obtaining an abortion," said corresponding author Elizabeth Janiak, ScD, an interdisciplinary researcher from the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the Brigham. "It's a common type of law across the U.S., but Massachusetts' is among the strictest and oldest laws."

When parental consent is not obtained, minors may obtain a court order through a confidential bypass hearing at which they are represented by pro bono legal counsel. The process requires corresponding with counselors and lawyers, scheduling the hearing, and traveling to a court during the school day. To determine the law's impact on abortion delays, the team reviewed 2,026 abortions obtained by women 17 years or younger at three Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts clinics in the Eastern, Central and Western regions of the state, between September 2010 and June 2016. During this time, 1,559 (77 percent) abortions were provided with parental consent and 467 (23 percent) abortions followed judicial bypass.

Overall, the team found an average delay of 6.1 days for minors associated with the judicial bypass. Minors with parental consent received abortions on average 8.6 days after initial contact, compared with 14.8 days for minors with judicial bypass. Additionally, 19 percent of minors utilizing bypass received care 21 days or more after initial contact, compared to 7 percent of those with parental consent.

"Our data demonstrate that Massachusetts' parental involvement law for abortion is associated with significant delays in care," said Janiak. "These delays can increase medical risks and constrain the clinical options available to patients."
Funding for this work was provided by the Society of Family Planning (SFP) Research Fund (grant numberSFPRF10-1). The findings and conclusions in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the SFP Research Fund or of Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc.

Paper cited: Janiak, E et al. "Procedural Timing Among Adolescents Undergoing Abortion" Obstetrics and Gynecology DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003190

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Related Hearing Articles:

Why you lose hearing for a while after listening to loud sounds
When we listen to loud sounds, our hearing may become impaired for a short time.
Older people who use hearing aids still report hearing challenges
A high proportion of older people with hearing aids, especially those with lower incomes, report having trouble hearing and difficulty accessing hearing care services, according to a study from researchers at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.
Hearing class
New study finds that the class of neurons responsible for transmitting information from the inner ear to the brain is composed of three molecularly distinct subtypes.
Hearing tests on wild whales
Scientists published the first hearing tests on a wild population of healthy marine mammals.
Genes critical for hearing identified
Fifty-two previously unidentified genes that are critical for hearing have been found by testing over 3,000 mouse genes.
More Hearing News and Hearing Current Events

Best Science Podcasts 2019

We have hand picked the best science podcasts for 2019. Sit back and enjoy new science podcasts updated daily from your favorite science news services and scientists.
Now Playing: TED Radio Hour

Rethinking Anger
Anger is universal and complex: it can be quiet, festering, justified, vengeful, and destructive. This hour, TED speakers explore the many sides of anger, why we need it, and who's allowed to feel it. Guests include psychologists Ryan Martin and Russell Kolts, writer Soraya Chemaly, former talk radio host Lisa Fritsch, and business professor Dan Moshavi.
Now Playing: Science for the People

#537 Science Journalism, Hold the Hype
Everyone's seen a piece of science getting over-exaggerated in the media. Most people would be quick to blame journalists and big media for getting in wrong. In many cases, you'd be right. But there's other sources of hype in science journalism. and one of them can be found in the humble, and little-known press release. We're talking with Chris Chambers about doing science about science journalism, and where the hype creeps in. Related links: The association between exaggeration in health related science news and academic press releases: retrospective observational study Claims of causality in health news: a randomised trial This...