Nav: Home

Massachusetts parental consent law leads to delays for minors seeking abortions

April 09, 2019

Massachusetts is among 37 states in the U.S. that currently mandate parental consent or notification before a minor is provided with abortion care. Minors who have a poor relationship with their parents or face other barriers to informing a parent or legal guardian may circumvent the consent requirement through a hearing with a judge (a judicial bypass hearing), but few studies have examined the impact that this process may have on delaying care. A new study published in Obstetrics and Gynecology led by investigators from Brigham and Women's Hospital addresses this question, using a retrospective cohort to quantify abortion delays associated with the judicial bypass process.

"Our study looks at the implications of a law that's been on the books for over 30 years in Massachusetts and requires a person under 18 to have parental consent before obtaining an abortion," said corresponding author Elizabeth Janiak, ScD, an interdisciplinary researcher from the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the Brigham. "It's a common type of law across the U.S., but Massachusetts' is among the strictest and oldest laws."

When parental consent is not obtained, minors may obtain a court order through a confidential bypass hearing at which they are represented by pro bono legal counsel. The process requires corresponding with counselors and lawyers, scheduling the hearing, and traveling to a court during the school day. To determine the law's impact on abortion delays, the team reviewed 2,026 abortions obtained by women 17 years or younger at three Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts clinics in the Eastern, Central and Western regions of the state, between September 2010 and June 2016. During this time, 1,559 (77 percent) abortions were provided with parental consent and 467 (23 percent) abortions followed judicial bypass.

Overall, the team found an average delay of 6.1 days for minors associated with the judicial bypass. Minors with parental consent received abortions on average 8.6 days after initial contact, compared with 14.8 days for minors with judicial bypass. Additionally, 19 percent of minors utilizing bypass received care 21 days or more after initial contact, compared to 7 percent of those with parental consent.

"Our data demonstrate that Massachusetts' parental involvement law for abortion is associated with significant delays in care," said Janiak. "These delays can increase medical risks and constrain the clinical options available to patients."
-end-
Funding for this work was provided by the Society of Family Planning (SFP) Research Fund (grant numberSFPRF10-1). The findings and conclusions in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the SFP Research Fund or of Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc.

Paper cited: Janiak, E et al. "Procedural Timing Among Adolescents Undergoing Abortion" Obstetrics and Gynecology DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003190

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Related Hearing Articles:

Why you lose hearing for a while after listening to loud sounds
When we listen to loud sounds, our hearing may become impaired for a short time.
Older people who use hearing aids still report hearing challenges
A high proportion of older people with hearing aids, especially those with lower incomes, report having trouble hearing and difficulty accessing hearing care services, according to a study from researchers at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.
Hearing class
New study finds that the class of neurons responsible for transmitting information from the inner ear to the brain is composed of three molecularly distinct subtypes.
Hearing tests on wild whales
Scientists published the first hearing tests on a wild population of healthy marine mammals.
Genes critical for hearing identified
Fifty-two previously unidentified genes that are critical for hearing have been found by testing over 3,000 mouse genes.
Is your partner's hearing loss driving you mad?
New research by academics at the University of Nottingham has suggested that the impact of a person's hearing loss on their nearest and dearest should be considered when personalizing rehabilitation plans for patients with deafness.
No significant change seen in hearing loss among US teens
Although there was an increase in the percentage of US youth ages 12 to 19 reporting exposure to loud music through headphones from 1988-2010, researchers did not find significant changes in the prevalence of hearing loss among this group, according to a study published by JAMA Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery.
Certain OTC, less expensive hearing aids provide benefit similar to conventional hearing aid
A comparison between less-expensive, over-the-counter hearing assistance devices and a conventional hearing aid found that some of these devices were associated with improvements in hearing similar to the hearing aid, according to a study published by JAMA.
This fly's incredible hearing is a curiosity to those developing better hearing aids
U of T Scarborough biologists study fly to develop better hearing aids.
Gene may hold key to hearing recovery
Researchers have discovered that a protein implicated in human longevity may also play a role in restoring hearing after noise exposure.
More Hearing News and Hearing Current Events

Top Science Podcasts

We have hand picked the top science podcasts of 2019.
Now Playing: TED Radio Hour

Accessing Better Health
Essential health care is a right, not a privilege ... or is it? This hour, TED speakers explore how we can give everyone access to a healthier way of life, despite who you are or where you live. Guests include physician Raj Panjabi, former NYC health commissioner Mary Bassett, researcher Michael Hendryx, and neuroscientist Rachel Wurzman.
Now Playing: Science for the People

#544 Prosperity Without Growth
The societies we live in are organised around growth, objects, and driving forward a constantly expanding economy as benchmarks of success and prosperity. But this growing consumption at all costs is at odds with our understanding of what our planet can support. How do we lower the environmental impact of economic activity? How do we redefine success and prosperity separate from GDP, which politicians and governments have focused on for decades? We speak with ecological economist Tim Jackson, Professor of Sustainable Development at the University of Surrey, Director of the Centre for the Understanding of Sustainable Propserity, and author of...
Now Playing: Radiolab

An Announcement from Radiolab