Study compares outcomes of 2 devices used in carotid artery stenting

April 20, 2015

WASHINGTON (April 20, 2015) - A study published today in JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions showed that in-hospital and 30-day stroke or death rates were equally low when using either a distal filter EPD (F-EPD) or a proximal EPD (P-EPD) to protect patients from blood clots during carotid artery stenting, but a small sample size for one device raises questions on the study's ability to detect potentially meaningful differences in outcomes.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services mandates that cardiologists use one of these two devices in order to be reimbursed for carotid artery stenting. The F-EPD uses small baskets to catch any debris produced during angioplasty and stent placement, while the P-EPD uses balloons to arrest or reverse flow to the internal carotid artery. Although some argue that latter method is superior because the carotid artery is protected throughout the entire procedure, it is less popular among cardiovascular professionals.

Using data from the American College of Cardiology's CARE Registry, the largest national registry of carotid artery stent patients, researchers assessed records from 10,246 patients who had elective carotid stent procedures with embolic protection between January 2009 and March 2013. An embolism is a blockage of a blood vessel created by a foreign object, such as a blood clot or air bubble. Of these procedures, practitioners used P-EPD in almost 6 percent of cases. These patients had higher rates of symptomatic lesions at the time of the procedure, higher rates of fast, irregular heartbeats, and a history of prior neurological events.

The results showed little difference in either in-hospital stroke or death between the two groups: 1.6 percent for the P-EPD group compared to 2 percent for the F-EPD group. For the 76.5 percent of patients for whom 30-day follow-up data were available, 2.7 percent of the P-EPD group experienced stroke or death while 4 percent of the F-EPD group had these adverse outcomes. Furthermore, no differences in outcomes were found between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients treated with either device.

Due to the modest number of P-EPD devices used, the study may not have been large enough to detect potentially meaningful differences in outcomes between the two devices.

"According to our calculations, a randomized trial of more than 6,000 patients would be needed to determine a statistically significant difference between P-EPD and F-EPD for 30-day adverse outcomes," said Jay Giri, M.D., M.P.H., the study's lead author and an assistant professor of clinical medicine at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania. "There are no known plans to organize such an effort, so it is likely that the current data will remain the best available evidence for the foreseeable future."
The American College of Cardiology is a 49,000-member medical society that is the professional home for the entire cardiovascular team. The mission of the College is to transform cardiovascular care and to improve heart health. The ACC leads in the formation of health policy, standards and guidelines. The College operates national registries to measure and improve care, provides professional medical education, disseminates cardiovascular research, and bestows credentials upon cardiovascular specialists who meet stringent qualifications. For more information, visit

American College of Cardiology

Related Blood Clots Articles from Brightsurf:

New cause of COVID-19 blood clots identified
A new study reveals that COVID-19 triggers production of antibodies circulating through the blood, causing clots in people hospitalized with the disease.

Children who take steroids at increased risk for diabetes, high blood pressure, blood clots
Children who take oral steroids to treat asthma or autoimmune diseases have an increased risk of diabetes, high blood pressure, and blood clots, according to Rutgers researchers.

COVID-19 may cause deadly blood clots
COVID-19 may increase the risk of blot cots in women who are pregnant or taking estrogen with birth control or hormone replacement therapy, according to a new manuscript published in the Endocrine Society's journal, Endocrinology.

New evidence for how blood clots may form in very ill COVID-19 patients
Neutrophil Extracellular Traps (NETs) have been implicated in causing excessive clotting in cancer patients.

Researchers find new way to detect blood clots
Researchers in the Department of Biomedical Engineering at Texas A&M University are working on an entirely new way to detect blood clots, especially in pediatric patients.

High rate of blood clots in COVID-19
COVID-19 is associated with a high incidence of venous thromboembolism, blood clots in the venous circulation, according to a study conducted by researchers at Brighton and Sussex Medical School (BSMS), UK.

New tool helps distinguish the cause of blood clots
A new tool using cutting-edge technology is able to distinguish different types of blood clots based on what caused them, according to a study published today in eLife.

Hookah smoke may be associated with increased risk of blood clots
In a new study conducted in mice, researchers found that tobacco smoke from a hookah caused blood to function abnormally and be more likely to clot and quickly form blood clots.

Reducing the risk of blood clots in artificial heart valves
People with mechanical heart valves need blood thinners on a daily basis, because they have a higher risk of blood clots and stroke.

New study provides insight into the mechanisms of blood clots in cancer patients
Researchers have identified a potential new signaling pathway that may help further the understanding of blood clot formation in cancer patients and ultimately help prevent this complication from occurring.

Read More: Blood Clots News and Blood Clots Current Events is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to