Study suggests differences in CT readings at oncology centers vs. general hospitals may impact RVUs

May 05, 2003

Preliminary results of a recent study suggest that CT readings at oncology centers are more time-consuming, complex, and have many more findings than readings at general hospitals, says Eric vanSonnenberg, MD, chief of radiology at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, and an author of the study.

Dr. vanSonnenberg says the study focuses on the complexities involved in CT readings at oncology centers vs. general hospitals and how they affect relative value unit assessments (RVUs), which measure productivity of physicians.

To determine how radiologists were using their time, Dr. vanSonnenberg and his colleagues compared the CT reports of 100 patients from an oncology center to CT reports of 100 patients from an affiliated general hospital. Reports were compared for type and number of associated studies, including chest, abdomen, and/or pelvis, length of report, number of characters, presence/absence of comparison films, number of tumor measurements obtained, and number of overall negative studies.

The average number of words in a CT report for the same examination at an oncology center was 338 compared with 276 at a general hospital. Similarly, the average number of characters in a report at an oncology center was 1,807 compared with 1,541 at a general hospital.

Prior scans were obtained and directly compared with the current scans in more than 90% of oncology center cases, compared with 50% at a general hospital. Likewise, measurements of tumor size were made in three-quarters of oncology center cases vs. 20% of general hospital cases.

CT scans in general hospitals are usually intended to target specific problem areas, Dr. vanSonnenberg says. "Exams at oncology centers are not just about a specific diagnosis or anatomic site; cancer can affect so many areas of the body with a host of potential complications. CT examinations in oncology centers tend to include a greater number of scans, from the chest through the pelvis, and are more reliant on prior scans for comparison."

Because the CT scans are more complex, it takes radiologists more time to read them, says Dr. vanSonnenberg. "CT scans read at general hospitals, for example, can take 3-5 minutes, while those at a cancer center can take upwards of 10-15 minutes," he says. Interruptions for consultations can also be more numerous at cancer centers as well.

All of these factors must be considered when reviewing radiologists' productivity, Dr. vanSonnenberg says.

The study will be presented May 5, during the American Roentgen Ray Society Annual Meeting in San Diego.
Danica Laub, 703-858-4332
Keri Sperry, 703-858-4306
Press Room: 619-525-6536

American College of Radiology

Related Cancer Articles from Brightsurf:

New blood cancer treatment works by selectively interfering with cancer cell signalling
University of Alberta scientists have identified the mechanism of action behind a new type of precision cancer drug for blood cancers that is set for human trials, according to research published in Nature Communications.

UCI researchers uncover cancer cell vulnerabilities; may lead to better cancer therapies
A new University of California, Irvine-led study reveals a protein responsible for genetic changes resulting in a variety of cancers, may also be the key to more effective, targeted cancer therapy.

Breast cancer treatment costs highest among young women with metastic cancer
In a fight for their lives, young women, age 18-44, spend double the amount of older women to survive metastatic breast cancer, according to a large statewide study by the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Cancer mortality continues steady decline, driven by progress against lung cancer
The cancer death rate declined by 29% from 1991 to 2017, including a 2.2% drop from 2016 to 2017, the largest single-year drop in cancer mortality ever reported.

Stress in cervical cancer patients associated with higher risk of cancer-specific mortality
Psychological stress was associated with a higher risk of cancer-specific mortality in women diagnosed with cervical cancer.

Cancer-sniffing dogs 97% accurate in identifying lung cancer, according to study in JAOA
The next step will be to further fractionate the samples based on chemical and physical properties, presenting them back to the dogs until the specific biomarkers for each cancer are identified.

Moffitt Cancer Center researchers identify one way T cell function may fail in cancer
Moffitt Cancer Center researchers have discovered a mechanism by which one type of immune cell, CD8+ T cells, can become dysfunctional, impeding its ability to seek and kill cancer cells.

More cancer survivors, fewer cancer specialists point to challenge in meeting care needs
An aging population, a growing number of cancer survivors, and a projected shortage of cancer care providers will result in a challenge in delivering the care for cancer survivors in the United States if systemic changes are not made.

New cancer vaccine platform a potential tool for efficacious targeted cancer therapy
Researchers at the University of Helsinki have discovered a solution in the form of a cancer vaccine platform for improving the efficacy of oncolytic viruses used in cancer treatment.

American Cancer Society outlines blueprint for cancer control in the 21st century
The American Cancer Society is outlining its vision for cancer control in the decades ahead in a series of articles that forms the basis of a national cancer control plan.

Read More: Cancer News and Cancer Current Events is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to