Animal ID good idea even if not mandatory yet

May 06, 2004

OVERTON - Even though federally mandated animal ID systems may a year or more away, it is in farmers and ranchers' self-interest to start voluntarily tagging their cattle electronically now, said one of the featured speakers at a recent East Texas forage and beef field day. The primary reasons producers should adopt the technology now are disease surveillance and limiting the potential for liability if there is a disease outbreak, said Tim Niedecken, information director for eMERGE Interactive, one of several Texas companies marketing electronic ID tags and related services in anticipation of the pending federal mandatory rules.

"Having animals ID'ed won't increase your liability, it will decrease it," Niedecken said, speaking to the more than 200 East Texas farmers and ranchers who attended a field day held April 15 at the Texas A&M University System Agricultural Research and Extension Center at Overton.

Beef industry leaders and government officials have been discussing individual animal ID for years. Both groups agree the end result will probably involve electronic ID tags of one type or another and a federal mandate. The single case of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (more commonly called "mad cow disease") in Washington state last December put individual animal ID on the fast track. Some industry experts were expecting the first stage of the animal ID infrastructure - - the assigning of ID numbers to either livestock operators or to their premises - - to begin this summer.

However, details implementation and a lack of federal funding have delayed the first stage from a few months to a year, said Niedecken, who serves on the National Identification Development Team. The NIDT is comprised of approximately 100 animal and livestock industry professionals representing over 70 associations, organizations and government agencies.

There are a number of issues delaying the finalization of the plan, Niedecken said. Among these issues the 10 different bills in U.S. Congress on animal ID plus various state legislative players and market forces, such as WalMart and McDonald's. Also involved are such agencies as the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Perhaps the most serious delaying issue is the question of who is going to pay for the animal ID infrastructure.

"Will the government pay for it? That's undetermined. Some say that as it's a national food safety issue, then government should pay for it. But the other side says, if the government pays for it, there will be a lot of strings attached. The right answer? I don't know," Niedecken said.

Niedecken was sure, he said, that it was in the best interests of producers and the industry overall to get on-board now. Dr. Jason Cleere, Texas Cooperative Extension beef cattle specialist, agreed.

"From an individual producer's standpoint, having an animal ID system in place could prevent him from being blamed for something he didn't do, such as drug residues and other food safety issues, which are caught at the processing plant. Plus, accurate records are important to maintain beef quality," Cleere said. "From the standpoint of disease outbreaks such as BSE, an animal ID system could save the industry billions of dollars."

By conservative estimates, the mad cow disease incident knocked $14 billion of the value of the national cattle herd in 10 days. A good part of the devaluation came from loss of exports. Fed cattle prices dropped from $91 or $92 per hundredweight to $74 or $74 in a few days, according to Niedecken.

"That works out to a loss of about $140 per head overnight for every cow; $140 gone, overnight out of your pocket," Niedecken said. Later, as it was learned that the stricken cow came from Canada, prices recovered somewhat, but verifying this fact and tracking the cow's movements took weeks.

"With an animal ID system in place, this could have theoretically taken 48 hours instead of 48 days," Cleere said.

Also, if neighboring producers would have had an animal ID system in place they could have been saved the trouble of quarantines, Cleere noted.

More information on animal ID can be found at the U.S. Animal ID Program site at
Writer: Robert Burns, (903) 834-6191,
Contact: Dr. Jason Cleere, (903) 834-6191,
Tim Niedecken, (817) 732-6536,

Texas A&M AgriLife Communications

Related Mad Cow Disease Articles from Brightsurf:

Children allergic to cow's milk smaller and lighter
Children allergic to cow's milk are smaller and weigh less, according to the first published study to characterize growth trajectories from early childhood to adolescence in children with persistent food allergies.

New tuberculosis tests pave way for cow vaccination programs
Skin tests that can distinguish between cattle that are infected with tuberculosis (TB) and those that have been vaccinated against the disease have been created by an international team of scientists.

Mad cow disease: A computational model reveals the mechanism of replication of prions
An article published in the journal PLOS Pathogens reports a realistic computational model for the structure and mechanism of replication of prions, infectious agents responsible for mad cow disease and other neurodegenerative disorders of human and animals.

New pathogens in beef and cow's milk products: More research required
In February 2019, the German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ) presented findings on new infection pathogens that go by the name of 'Bovine Milk and Meat Factors' (BMMF).

A comprehensive look at cow's milk
Milk is a staple of the human diet, full of key nutrients such as protein, carbohydrates, fats, and vitamins.

The taming of the dog, cow, horse, pig and rabbit
Research at the Earlham Institute into one of the 'genetic orchestra conductors', microRNAs, sheds light on our selectively guided evolution of domestic pets and farmyard animals such as dogs and cows.

The explosive consequences of cow burps (video)
Cows burp up more gas than you might think possible when they're digesting grass.

Is it possible to prevent type 1 diabetes by avoiding cow's milk?
The long-awaited result of the TRIGR Study shows that baby formula in which the cow's milk proteins have been split does not prevent type 1 diabetes in children with genetic risk for type 1 diabetes.

In-car cow avoidance
Driverless cars are hitting the headlines across the globe but for the foreseeable future we will still have drivers.

A badger can bury a cow by itself
While studying scavenger behavior in Utah's Great Basin Desert, University of Utah biologists observed an American badger do something that no other scientists had documented before: bury an entire calf carcass by itself.

Read More: Mad Cow Disease News and Mad Cow Disease Current Events is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to