Nonwhites, New Yorkers Have Worst City Housing Quality

May 08, 1997

ITHACA, N.Y. -- For many urban Americans -- especially nonwhites and New Yorkers -- home sweet home is structurally inadequate and overcrowded, according to a new Cornell University study.

Although American housing quality has improved dramatically over the past 50 years, nonwhites were three times more likely to live in structurally inadequate housing than whites in seven representative metropolitan areas studied. When factors such as income, education, location, race and age of building were controlled for statistically, being black or white became the only significant racial predictors for structual

inadequacy.

Buildings in central cities and rental housing were also more likely to be structurally inadequate in urban areas, says Nandinee Kutty, Ph.D., assistant professor of consumer economics and housing at Cornell, with New York City ranking among the lowest on many measures. Residents with higher incomes were less likely to live in structurally inadequate housing. Controlling for several factors such as income, and elderly status reduces the probability of living in structurally inadequate housing.

"When it came to crowding, Hispanics (13 percent) and Asians (about 11 percent) were more likely to live in crowded homes, followed by blacks (5 percent) and few whites (1 percent)," said Kutty, who analyzed 1991 data on seven metropolitan areas -- Atlanta, Baltimore, New York City, St. Louis, San Diego, Seattle and Washington, D.C. -- from the American Housing Survey of Metropolitan Areas to determine which factors influence structural adequacy and crowding. She noted, however, that some of the racial differences involving crowding may be due to more multi-generational families living together among Hispanics and Asians.

She presented her study, "Housing Quality Across Seven U.S. Metropolitan Areas," to the 1997 meeting of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association in New Orleans this past January.

"In 1949, Congress established the national housing goal to provide 'a decent home and a suitable living environment for every American family,'" said Kutty, who teaches courses at Cornell on housing economics, urban economics and policy, and policy analysis. "Good housing is important for its beneficial impact on health and well-being. The concept of a 'decent home' implies good quality housing. In this study, I use structual adequacy and crowding as measures of housing quality to see how far we've come in achieving the housing goal."

Kutty found a wide disparity among the seven cities. New York, for example, had the highest percentage of inadequate housing (11.5 percent) compared with San Diego, Seattle and St. Louis, with only 3 percent of dwellings in those cities in inadequate condition. The highest rate of crowding was 5.4 percent in New York City, compared with only 1 percent in Seattle. When factors were controlled statistically to predict which urban area had the highest probability of crowding, San Diego emerged as the leader.

Among Kutty's other findings on structural adequacy of American metropolitan housing:

-- About 15 percent of Hispanics and 13 percent of African Americans in the seven metropolitan areas lived in structually inadequate dwellings, compared with 4 percent of whites.

-- Far more rental housing was inadequate compared with owner-occupied; 22 percent of rental housing was of inadequate quality compared with 2.5 percent of owner-occupied homes.

-- Dwellings in the central city were much more likely to be inadequate, even when factors such as income, race, education and structural type (single or multiple family) were taken into account. The most dramatic case was in New York City, where only 3 percent of the dwellings in the suburbs were structurally inadequate compared with 14 percent in the central city.

-- Multifamily buildings with less than 20 units were more likely to be structurally adequate than single-family detached homes, when income, location and form of tenure (rent vs. own) were controlled for.

Defining crowding as a dwelling with more than one person per room, Kutty also found:

-- Overall, about 3 percent of the metropolitan homes were crowded.

-- Renters were five times more likely than home owners to live in crowded homes.

-- Households with children were much more likely to be crowded than houses without children, as might be expected.

While education emerged as a factor for both structural adequacy and noncrowded housing, Kutty found that income was not a significant factor in predicting crowding. On the other hand, income was a significant factor in predicting structural adequacy.

"Whereas structural adequacy looks like it's strongly determined by economic and engineering factors, such as income and type and age of building, crowding has stronger cultural and family life-cycle determinants, such as ethnicity, education and the presence of young children," Kutty concluded.

The study was supported in part with funds from the College of Human Ecology.
-end-


Cornell University

Related Housing Quality Articles from Brightsurf:

Lockdown interviews show poor housing quality has made life even tougher
New research from the University of Huddersfield, in conjunction with the Northern Housing Consortium and Nationwide Foundation, shows the shocking extent of how much people struggled to cope whilst living with poor housing conditions in the north of England during the first lockdown, between May and July 2020

Housing First proves cost effective especially for the most-vulnerable homeless group
Canadians spend big money dealing with the consequences of homelessness, but the money spent could be far more effective.

Housing conditions affect cardiovascular health risks
Lack of stable housing or inadequate housing is related to high blood pressure, obesity and other risk factors for cardiovascular events such as heart attacks, strokes, heart failure and others.

Housing insecurity may increase risk of kidney disease
In a study of urban-dwelling individuals, housing insecurity was linked with a higher risk of developing albuminuria, a sign of kidney disease.

New guideline provides pathway to end homelessness, with housing as the foundation
A collaborative approach is required to build health care pathways that will end homelessness in Canada.

Novel intervention in senior housing communities increases resilience and wisdom
Researchers at University of California San Diego School of Medicine, in collaboration with Mather Institute, developed a method to enhance resilience and reduce subjective stress in residents living in senior housing communities.

Historical housing disparities linked with dangerous climate impacts
Extreme heat kills more people in the United States than any other type of hazardous weather and will likely become even deadlier due to climate change.

Restrictive housing is associated with increased risk of death after release from prison
A new study led by researchers at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill has found that being held in restrictive housing (i.e., solitary confinement) is associated with an increased risk of death after a person is released from prison.

Murrow professor investigates gender-inclusive housing and friendships
Gender-inclusive spaces may help young people develop friendships across gender identities, according to a new study by a Washington State University researcher.

Every third housing estate resident feels trapped
Involuntary staying, a type of housing trap, is a common experience among people living on housing estates, since around one in three residents feel that they are trapped in their current residential arrangements.

Read More: Housing Quality News and Housing Quality Current Events
Brightsurf.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.