In-person training proves most effective method to educate laypeople in bleeding control

May 09, 2018

Boston, MA -- The most common cause of preventable death following traumatic injury is uncontrolled bleeding, and traumatic injury is the leading cause of death for Americans under 46. Researchers at Brigham and Women's Hospital devised the PATTS Trial (Public Access and Tourniquet Training Study) to measure how effective different training methods are in preparing laypeople, the non-medical public, to control bleeding with a tourniquet and whether they could retain that skill. The findings are published this week in JAMA Surgery.

On April 15, 2013, Boston experienced a tragic mass casualty event when two homemade bombs left three dead and 243 people injured near the Boston Marathon finish line. A combination of factors - increased medical staffing at the scene, multiple experienced Level I Trauma Centers close by, and short transport times - contributed to quick and effective medical care despite the severity of injuries. "The concept that laypeople can be empowered and help save lives was clearly demonstrated on that day," said Eric Goralnick, MD, MS, medical director of Emergency Preparedness, emergency medicine physician at Brigham and Women's Hospital, and lead author on this study.

Since the Boston Marathon bombing, several national initiatives, including the White House's "Stop the Bleed" and FEMA's "You Are the Help Until Help Arrives" have emerged to empower laypeople to act as immediate responders. Point-of-care instructional interventions, flashcards and audio or video kits have also been developed in response to scalability challenges associated with in-person training. But questions remain regarding the type, frequency, and format of training needed to competently prepare non-medical personnel for hemorrhage control.

Funded by The Gillian Reny Stepping Strong Center for Trauma Innovation, and in partnership with Gillette Stadium and the New England Patriots, the PATTS Trial was designed to not only train Gillette Stadium staff in responding to uncontrolled bleeding but to test whether, and under what conditions, such training was effective. Under the PATTS Trial, 465 Gillette Stadium employees with no previous hemorrhage control training were randomized into four arms, each utilizing either point-of-care interventions or the Bleeding Control Basic (B-Con) course before being assessed for correct tourniquet application in a simulated situation. After testing, all participants attended the B-Con course, and 303 of these participants were retested three to nine months after training to assess retention.

Researchers found that in-person training, via the B-Con Course, was the most effective instructional method and resulted in 88 percent of participants correctly applying a tourniquet. By comparison, participants who received no training applied a tourniquet correctly only 16 percent of the time, and participants who had access to instructional flashcards or an audio kit plus flashcards experienced only small gains in effectiveness (correctly applying the tourniquet 19.6 percent and 23 percent of the time, respectively). The PATTS Trial also evaluated skill retention over a period of three to nine months after training and found that 54.5 percent of those reassessed during that time span could correctly apply a tourniquet, emphasizing the need for refresher training.

"Before the PATTS trial, we didn't know what was the best way to train the public in bleeding control. Now that we know, we can be more effective in creating training programs, public awareness campaigns, and tools to empower people," said Adil Haider MD, MPH, a trauma surgeon and Kessler Director of the Center for Surgery and Public Health at BWH.

Researchers stress that most external hemorrhages can and should be controlled by direct pressure. While bystanders were critical first responders following the Marathon bombings, of the 27 improvised tourniquets applied at the scene, subsequent research indicated that all were applied incorrectly. Most commonly, an incorrectly applied tourniquet is one that is too loose to stop blood flow or one that is positioned as to stop venous rather than arterial blood flow, meaning it accelerates blood loss.

"The PATTS Trial is a critical learning tool in understanding how to react and respond to an uncontrolled bleeding event," said Jim Nolan, chief operating officer of Gillette Stadium and the New England Patriots. "We are proud to partner with Brigham and Women's Hospital on this important research and extremely grateful to have participated in such an important and effective program that will undoubtedly save lives by demonstrating to the general public the proper way to react and treat uncontrolled bleeding injuries."

Said Goralnick, "Our next steps include convening a consensus conference with clinicians and researchers from the medical and public health sectors to define a common research agenda for laypeople and bleeding control."

"Intervention from bystanders in any situation, not just mass casualty, can help save a life," said Meghan McDonald, a trauma nurse at BWH and co-author of the study. "Some people hesitate, especially when it comes to tourniquets, because they are afraid of causing more harm. Educating laypeople on hemorrhage control, be it direct pressure or tourniquet application, is not only the responsible thing to do as a trauma center, it is the right thing to do."

Researchers from the Level 1 Trauma Center, the Center for Surgery and Public Health, and the Department of Emergency Medicine at BWH were collaborators in designing the PATTS Trial.
-end-
The Center for Surgery and Public Health (CSPH) at Brigham and Women's Hospital was established in 2005 as a joint program of Harvard Medical School and the Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health. Its mission is to advance the science of surgical care delivery by studying effectiveness, quality, equity, and value at the population level, and developing surgeon-scientists committed to excellence in these areas. CSPH works with a diverse set of collaborators, including academic institutions, non-profit and for-profit organizations nationally and internationally, in order to eliminate disparities and foster patient-centered care through policy and practice.

Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH) is a 793-bed nonprofit teaching affiliate of Harvard Medical School and a founding member of Partners HealthCare. BWH has more than 4.2 million annual patient visits and nearly 46,000 inpatient stays, is the largest birthing center in Massachusetts and employs nearly 16,000 people. The Brigham's medical preeminence dates back to 1832, and today that rich history in clinical care is coupled with its national leadership in patient care, quality improvement and patient safety initiatives, and its dedication to research, innovation, community engagement and educating and training the next generation of health care professionals. Through investigation and discovery conducted at its Brigham Research Institute (BRI), BWH is an international leader in basic, clinical and translational research on human diseases, more than 1,000 physician-investigators and renowned biomedical scientists and faculty supported by nearly $600 million in funding. For the last 25 years, BWH ranked second in research funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) among independent hospitals. BWH continually pushes the boundaries of medicine, including building on its legacy in transplantation by performing a partial face transplant in 2009 and the nation's first full face transplant in 2011. BWH is also home to major landmark epidemiologic population studies, including the Nurses' and Physicians' Health Studies and the Women's Health Initiative as well as the TIMI Study Group, one of the premier cardiovascular clinical trials groups. For more information, resources and to follow us on social media, please visit BWH's online newsroom.

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Related Public Health Articles from Brightsurf:

COVID-19 and the decolonization of Indigenous public health
Indigenous self-determination, leadership and knowledge have helped protect Indigenous communities in Canada during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, and these principles should be incorporated into public health in future, argue the authors of a commentary in CMAJ (Canadian Medical Association Journal) http://www.cmaj.ca/lookup/doi/10.1503/cmaj.200852.

Public health consequences of policing homelessness
In a new study examining homelessness, researchers find that policy such a lifestyle has massive public health implications, making sleeping on the street even MORE unhealthy.

Electronic health information exchange improves public health disease reporting
Disease tracking is an important area of focus for health departments in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Pandemic likely to cause long-term health problems, Yale School of Public Health finds
The coronavirus pandemic's life-altering effects are likely to result in lasting physical and mental health consequences for many people--particularly those from vulnerable populations--a new study led by the Yale School of Public Health finds.

The Lancet Public Health: US modelling study estimates impact of school closures for COVID-19 on US health-care workforce and associated mortality
US policymakers considering physical distancing measures to slow the spread of COVID-19 face a difficult trade-off between closing schools to reduce transmission and new cases, and potential health-care worker absenteeism due to additional childcare needs that could ultimately increase mortality from COVID-19, according to new modelling research published in The Lancet Public Health journal.

The Lancet Public Health: Access to identification documents reflecting gender identity may improve trans mental health
Results from a survey of over 20,000 American trans adults suggest that having access to identification documents which reflect their identified gender helps to improve their mental health and may reduce suicidal thoughts, according to a study published in The Lancet Public Health journal.

The Lancet Public Health: Study estimates mental health impact of welfare reform, Universal Credit, in Great Britain
The 2013 Universal Credit welfare reform appears to have led to an increase in the prevalence of psychological distress among unemployed recipients, according to a nationally representative study following more than 52,000 working-age individuals from England, Wales, and Scotland over nine years between 2009-2018, published as part of an issue of The Lancet Public Health journal on income and health.

BU researchers: Pornography is not a 'public health crisis'
Researchers from the Boston University School of Public Health (BUSPH) have written an editorial in the American Journal of Public Health special February issue arguing against the claim that pornography is a public health crisis, and explaining why such a claim actually endangers the health of the public.

The Lancet Public Health: Ageism linked to poorer health in older people in England
Ageism may be linked with poorer health in older people in England, according to an observational study of over 7,500 people aged over 50 published in The Lancet Public Health journal.

Study: Public transportation use linked to better public health
Promoting robust public transportation systems may come with a bonus for public health -- lower obesity rates.

Read More: Public Health News and Public Health Current Events
Brightsurf.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.