Nav: Home

Economists find net benefit in soda tax

May 20, 2019

A team of economists has concluded that soda taxes serve as a "net good," an assessment based on an analysis of health benefits and consumer behavior. The work, which sees advantages similar to those of long-standing cigarette taxes, also offers policy parameters that it views as more effective than many existing soda taxes.

The analysis, by researchers at New York University, the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, and the University of California, Berkeley, was released today as a National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) working paper.

"The research is clear that sugary drinks are bad for our health," observe NYU's Hunt Allcott, Wharton's Benjamin Lockwood, and UC Berkeley's Dmitry Taubinsky, the papers' authors. "Our study takes a next step to evaluate the overall economic rationale as to whether we should impose a tax. Using an economic framework, we show that taxing soda generates net benefits to society--taking into account the health effects, the enjoyment that people get from drinking the drinks they enjoy, the value of the tax revenues, and other factors."

The research estimates that a nationwide soda tax would yield $7 billion in net benefits to society each year.

The research also considers concerns about regressivity.

"We estimate that soda taxes benefit both low- and high-income people," the researchers say. "While low-income people drink more sugary drinks and thus pay more in soda taxes, their health also benefits more from drinking less."

The researchers also find that state-level taxes would be even more effective than city-level taxes, such as those implemented in San Francisco, Philadelphia, and other U.S. cities.

"Soda taxes would yield more benefit at the state level than they would at the city level, both because they cover more people and because buying tax-free soda just outside the city, which some people do, dilutes the benefits of a tax," the authors observe.

Arizona, California, Michigan, and Washington have passed legislation or referenda banning their cities from adopting new soda taxes. The papers' findings suggest that these bans are not economically justified.

Their conclusions on the societal benefits of soda taxes are based on the following:
  • Much like the cars emitting pollution that harms others, sugary drinks are linked to diabetes, obesity, and heart disease, resulting in medical bills ultimately paid by taxpayers through Medicare and Medicaid, or by private insurers. The researchers estimate that, on average, drinking a 12-ounce can of Coke will impose about 10 cents of health care costs on others.

  • Fifty-three percent of Americans who consume sugary drinks say they do so "more often than I should," according to a previous survey, which suggests that soda taxes help people reduce consumption toward the level they want for themselves. In addition, people with high nutrition knowledge drink many fewer sugary drinks, indicating that soda taxes help people reduce consumption toward the level they would choose for themselves if they were fully informed about the health impacts.

  • Previous studies have shown that low-income people bear the brunt of diabetes, obesity, and heart disease--afflictions linked to consumption of sugary drinks--so they would likely benefit the most from drinking fewer of these beverages. Furthermore, low-income people have lower nutrition knowledge and are more likely to report drinking soda "more often than I should."
The work also offers guidelines for making existing soda taxes more effective while acknowledging finding an optimal tax level requires additional study:

  • Noting that it's the sugar, not the water, that is unhealthy, the researchers say that taxes should scale with the amount of sugar in a drink, not the volume of liquid. They calculate that the net benefits would be much larger at a tax rate of 0.5 cents per gram of sugar than at the standard 1 cent per ounce of liquid.
    • Implementing taxes at the state or national level, instead of the current smattering of city-level taxes, would be more beneficial as it would diminish "cross-border shopping."

    • The existing tax in Philadelphia includes diet drinks, even though the health harms from diet drinks are not clearly established, posing a financial burden while not offering a robust health benefit. "Soda taxes should be limited to sugary drinks, where the health evidence is more clear," the economists argue.

    • The analysis shows that the standard 1-cent-per-ounce tax rate might be too low for a state-level tax to yield health and economic benefits and might be too high for a city-level tax in places with substantial cross-border shopping. "Because these estimates involve a number of assumptions, we need more research on this issue," the researchers write.
    -end-
    The studies, supported by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, will appear later this year in the peer-reviewed Quarterly Journal of Economics and the Journal of Economic Perspectives.

    Hunt Allcott is an associate professor of economics at New York University and a principal researcher at Microsoft Research. Benjamin B. Lockwood is an assistant professor of economics at the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania. Dmitry Taubinsky is an assistant professor of economics at the University of California, Berkeley.

    New York University

    Related Drinking Articles:

    Which came first: Brain size or drinking propensity?
    Contrary to the belief that drinking can literally shrink one's brain, a new study that includes researchers from Arts & Sciences suggests that a small brain might be a risk factor for heavier alcohol consumption.
    Frequent drinking is greater risk factor for heart rhythm disorder than binge drinking
    Drinking small amounts of alcohol frequently is linked with a higher likelihood of atrial fibrillation than binge drinking, according to research published today in EP Europace, a journal of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).
    Binge drinking may be more damaging to women
    In a recently published study examining the effects of binge drinking on rats, researchers from the University of Missouri School of Medicine discovered that female rats who were of equal age and weight to male rats were more sensitive to alcohol and experienced alcoholic liver injury at a higher rate than male rats.
    What predicts college students' drinking habits? How much they think others are drinking
    A new study by researchers at Virginia Commonwealth University examined students' genetic risk of alcohol use, roommates' drinking habits and the perception of peer drinking.
    Drinking diplomacy
    Using newly discovered archival materials, Igor Fedyukin of the Higher School of Economics, in collaboration with Robert Collis (Drake University) and Ernest A.
    College drinking intervention strategies need a refresh
    Peer approval is the best indicator of the tendency for new college students to drink or smoke according to new research from Michigan State University.
    The five types of problem drinking are more common at different ages
    Alcohol abuse is more complicated than simply drinking too much.
    Drinking changes young adults' metabolite profile
    Adolescent drinking is associated with changes in the metabolite profile, a new study from the University of Eastern Finland and Kuopio University Hospital shows.
    Lay interventions for depression and drinking
    Brief psychological interventions delivered by lay counselors in primary care were effective and cost-effective for patients with depression and harmful drinking in India, according to two studies in PLOS Medicine by Vikram Patel of Harvard Medical School, USA, and colleagues from the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK and Sangath, India.
    When Russian teenagers start drinking
    High school students intending to pursue vocational education consume alcohol more often than their peers who are planning to go to universities.
  • Top Science Podcasts

    We have hand picked the top science podcasts of 2019.
    Now Playing: TED Radio Hour

    Accessing Better Health
    Essential health care is a right, not a privilege ... or is it? This hour, TED speakers explore how we can give everyone access to a healthier way of life, despite who you are or where you live. Guests include physician Raj Panjabi, former NYC health commissioner Mary Bassett, researcher Michael Hendryx, and neuroscientist Rachel Wurzman.
    Now Playing: Science for the People

    #544 Prosperity Without Growth
    The societies we live in are organised around growth, objects, and driving forward a constantly expanding economy as benchmarks of success and prosperity. But this growing consumption at all costs is at odds with our understanding of what our planet can support. How do we lower the environmental impact of economic activity? How do we redefine success and prosperity separate from GDP, which politicians and governments have focused on for decades? We speak with ecological economist Tim Jackson, Professor of Sustainable Development at the University of Surrey, Director of the Centre for the Understanding of Sustainable Propserity, and author of...
    Now Playing: Radiolab

    An Announcement from Radiolab