Nav: Home

Synthetic biologists hack bacterial sensors

May 20, 2019

Rice University synthetic biologists have hacked bacterial sensing with a plug-and-play system that could be used to mix-and-match tens of thousands of sensory inputs and genetic outputs. The technology has wide-ranging implications for medical diagnostics, the study of deadly pathogens, environmental monitoring and more.

In a project spanning almost six years, Rice bioengineer Jeff Tabor and colleagues conducted thousands of experiments to show they could systematically rewire two-component systems, the genetic circuits bacteria use to sense their surroundings and listen to their neighbors. Their work appears in a study published this week in Nature Chemical Biology.

Tabor's group rewired the outputs of known bacterial sensors and also moved sensors between distantly related bacteria. Most importantly, they showed they could identify the function of an unknown sensor.

"Based on genomic analyses, we know there are at least 25,000 two-component systems in bacteria," said Tabor, associate professor of bioengineering at Rice's Brown School of Engineering and the lead scientist on the project. "However, for about 99% of them, we have no idea what they sense or what genes they activate in response."

The importance of a new tool that unlocks two-component systems is underscored by the 2018 discovery of two strains of a deadly, multidrug-resistant bacterium that uses an unknown two-component system to evade colistin, an antibiotic of last resort. But Tabor said the possible uses of the tool extend beyond medicine.

"This is nature's greatest treasure trove of biosensors," he said. "Based on the exquisite specificity and sensitivity of some of the two-component systems we do understand, it's widely believed bacterial sensors will outperform anything humans can make with today's best technology."

Tabor said that is because bacterial sensors have been honed and refined through billions of years of evolution.

"Bacteria don't have anything nearly as sophisticated as eyes, ears or a nose, but they travel between very different environments -- like a leaf or an intestine or the soil -- and their survival depends on their ability to sense and adapt to those changes," he said.

"Two-component systems are how they do that," Tabor said. "These are the systems they use to "see" light, "smell" the chemicals around them and "hear" the latest community news, which comes in the form of biochemical tweets broadcast by their neighbors."

Bacteria are the most abundant form of life, and two-component systems have shown up in virtually every bacterial genome that has been sequenced. Most species have about two dozen of the sensors and some have several hundred.

There are more than half a dozen broad categories of two-component systems, but all of them work in a similar way. They have a sensor kinase (SK) component that "listens" for a signal from the outside world, and upon "hearing" it, initiates a process called phosphorylation. That activates the second component, a response regulator (RR) that acts upon a specific gene -- turning it on or off like a switch or up or down like a dial.

While the genetic code for the components is easily spotted on a genomic scan, the dual mystery makes it almost impossible for biologists to determine what a two-component system does.

"If you don't know the signal that it senses and you don't know the gene that it acts on, it's really hard," Tabor said. "We know either the input or the output of about 1% of two-component systems, and we know both the inputs and outputs for fewer still."

Scientists do know that SK's are typically transmembrane proteins, with a sensing domain, a kind of biochemical antenna, that pokes through the bacteria's saclike outer membrane. Each sensor domain is designed to latch onto a specific signal molecule, or ligand. Each SK has its own target ligand, and binding with the ligand is what starts the chain reaction that turn a gene on, off, up or down.

Importantly, though every two-component system is optimized for a specific ligand, their SK and RR components work in similar ways. With that in mind, Tabor and study co-lead author Sebastian Schmidl decided in late 2013 to try swapping the DNA-binding domain, the part of the response regulator that recognizes DNA and activates the pathway's target gene.

"If you look at previous structural studies, the DNA-binding domain often looks like cargo that's just hitching a ride from the phosphorylation domain," Tabor said. "Because of that, we thought DNA-binding domains might function like interchangeable modules, or Lego blocks."

To test the idea, Schmidl, then a DFG Postdoctoral Fellow in Tabor's group, rewired the components of two light sensors Tabor's team had previously developed, one that responded to red light and other that responded to green. Schmidl rewired the input of the red-light sensor to the output of the green-light sensor at 39 different locations between the phosphorylation and DNA-binding domains. To see if any of the 39 splices worked, he stimulated them with red light and looked for a green-light response.

"Ten of them worked on the first try, and there was an optimum, a specific location where the splice really seemed to work well," Tabor said.

In fact, the test worked so well that he and Schmidl thought they might have simply gotten lucky and spliced together two unusually well-matched pathways. So they repeated the test, first attaching four additional DNA-binding domains to the same response regulator and later attaching five DNA-binding domains to the same sensor pathway. Most of those rewirings worked as well, indicating the approach was far more modular than any previously published approaches.

Schmidl, now an assistant professor of biology at the Texas A&M University System's RELLIS campus in Bryan, left Rice in 2016. Co-lead author Felix Ekness, a Ph.D. student in Rice's Systems, Synthetic and Physical Biology (SSPB) program, then took up the project, engineering dozens of new chimeras and conducting hundreds more experiments to show the method could be used to mix and match DNA-binding domains between different species of bacteria and between different families of two-component systems.

Tabor knew a top-flight journal would require a demonstration of how the technology could be used, and discovering the function of a totally new two-component system was the ultimate test. For this, postdoctoral fellow Kristina Daeffler and SSPB Ph.D. student Kathryn Brink transplanted seven different unknown two-component systems from the bacterium Shewanella oneidensis into E. coli. They engineered a new E. coli strain for each unknown sensor, and used DNA-binding domain swapping to link all their activities to the expression of green fluorescent protein.

While they didn't know the input for any of the seven, they did know that S. oneidensis was discovered in a lake in upstate New York. Based on that, they chose 117 different chemicals that S. oneidensis might benefit from sensing. Because each chemical had to be tested one-on-one with each mutant and a control group, Brink had to perform and replicate almost 1,000 separate experiments. The effort paid off when she discovered that one of the sensors was detecting changes in pH.

A genomic search for the newly identified sensor underscored the importance of having a tool to unlock two-component systems: The pH sensor turned up in several bacteria, including the pathogen that causes bubonic plague.

"This highlights how unlocking the mechanism of two-component systems could help us better understand and hopefully better treat disease as well," Tabor said.

Where is Tabor taking the technology next?

He's using it to mine the genomes of human gut bacteria for novel sensors of diseases including inflammatory bowel disease and cancer, with the goal of engineering a new generation of smart probiotics that can diagnose and treat these diseases.
Additional co-authors include graduate student Karl Gerhardt, former graduate student Brian Landry and former undergraduate research assistants Katri Sofjan, Nikola Dyulgyarov and Ravi Sheth.

High-resolution IMAGES are available for download at: CAPTION: Rice University synthetic biologists have hacked bacterial sensing with a plug-and-play system that could be used to mix and match tens of thousands of sensory inputs and genetic outputs. Those involved with the years-long project include (from left) Sebastian Schmidl, Jeff Tabor, Karl Gerhardt and Felix Ekness. (Photo by Jeff Fitlow/Rice University) CAPTION: Kathryn Brink is a Ph.D. student in Rice University's Systems, Synthetic and Physical Biology Graduate Program. (Photo by Jeff Fitlow/Rice University) CAPTION: To discover the function of a totally new two-component system, Rice University synthetic biologists rewired the genetic circuitry in seven strains of bacteria and examined how each behaved when exposed to 117 individual chemicals. (Photo by Jeff Fitlow/Rice University) CAPTION: In the final phase of the study, Rice University graduate student Kathryn Brink performed and replicated almost 1,000 separate experiments to isolate the previously unknown function of a bacterial two-component sensor. (Photo by Jeff Fitlow/Rice University) CAPTION: Jeff Tabor is an Associate Professor of Bioengineering and of Biosciences at Rice University. (Credit: Jeff Fitlow/Rice University)

The DOI of the Nature Chemical Biology paper is: 10.1038/s41589-019-0286-6

A copy of the paper is available at:

George R. Brown School of Engineering:

Rice Department of Bioengineering:

Related research stories from Rice:

Switch-in-a-cell electrifies life -- Dec. 17, 2018

Rice U. announces $82 million in strategic research initiatives -- Oct. 16, 2018

Grant aims students toward next-gen bioelectronics -- Sept. 4, 2018

Models give synthetic biologists a head start -- Aug. 14, 2018

Sensor strategy a boon for synthetic biology -- April 12, 2018

Rice U. biologists create toolkit for tuning genetic circuits -- Jan. 11, 2018

New tools advance bio-logic -- Aug. 4, 2014

Rice synthetic biologists shine light on genetic circuit analysis -- March 9, 2014

No bioengineered gut bacteria, no glory -- May 12, 2014

Rice to genes: Why the wait? -- Aug. 14, 2012

Rice, UW win $2M grant for synthetic biology research -- Sept. 16, 2011

This news release can be found online at Follow Rice News and Media Relations on Twitter @RiceUNews.

Located on a 300-acre forested campus in Houston, Rice University is consistently ranked among the nation's top 20 universities by U.S. News & World Report. Rice has highly respected schools of Architecture, Business, Continuing Studies, Engineering, Humanities, Music, Natural Sciences and Social Sciences and is home to the Baker Institute for Public Policy. With 3,962 undergraduates and 3,027 graduate students, Rice's undergraduate student-to-faculty ratio is just under 6-to-1. Its residential college system builds close-knit communities and lifelong friendships, just one reason why Rice is ranked No. 1 for lots of race/class interaction and No. 2 for quality of life by the Princeton Review. Rice is also rated as a best value among private universities by Kiplinger's Personal Finance.

Rice University

Related Bacteria Articles:

Bacteria might help other bacteria to tolerate antibiotics better
A new paper by the Dynamical Systems Biology lab at UPF shows that the response by bacteria to antibiotics may depend on other species of bacteria they live with, in such a way that some bacteria may make others more tolerant to antibiotics.
Two-faced bacteria
The gut microbiome, which is a collection of numerous beneficial bacteria species, is key to our overall well-being and good health.
Microcensus in bacteria
Bacillus subtilis can determine proportions of different groups within a mixed population.
Right beneath the skin we all have the same bacteria
In the dermis skin layer, the same bacteria are found across age and gender.
Bacteria must be 'stressed out' to divide
Bacterial cell division is controlled by both enzymatic activity and mechanical forces, which work together to control its timing and location, a new study from EPFL finds.
How bees live with bacteria
More than 90 percent of all bee species are not organized in colonies, but fight their way through life alone.
The bacteria building your baby
Australian researchers have laid to rest a longstanding controversy: is the womb sterile?
Hopping bacteria
Scientists have long known that key models of bacterial movement in real-world conditions are flawed.
Bacteria uses viral weapon against other bacteria
Bacterial cells use both a virus -- traditionally thought to be an enemy -- and a prehistoric viral protein to kill other bacteria that competes with it for food according to an international team of researchers who believe this has potential implications for future infectious disease treatment.
Drug diversity in bacteria
Bacteria produce a cocktail of various bioactive natural products in order to survive in hostile environments with competing (micro)organisms.
More Bacteria News and Bacteria Current Events

Trending Science News

Current Coronavirus (COVID-19) News

Top Science Podcasts

We have hand picked the top science podcasts of 2020.
Now Playing: TED Radio Hour

Teaching For Better Humans 2.0
More than test scores or good grades–what do kids need for the future? This hour, TED speakers explore how to help children grow into better humans, both during and after this time of crisis. Guests include educators Richard Culatta and Liz Kleinrock, psychologist Thomas Curran, and writer Jacqueline Woodson.
Now Playing: Science for the People

#556 The Power of Friendship
It's 2020 and times are tough. Maybe some of us are learning about social distancing the hard way. Maybe we just are all a little anxious. No matter what, we could probably use a friend. But what is a friend, exactly? And why do we need them so much? This week host Bethany Brookshire speaks with Lydia Denworth, author of the new book "Friendship: The Evolution, Biology, and Extraordinary Power of Life's Fundamental Bond". This episode is hosted by Bethany Brookshire, science writer from Science News.
Now Playing: Radiolab

Dispatch 3: Shared Immunity
More than a million people have caught Covid-19, and tens of thousands have died. But thousands more have survived and recovered. A week or so ago (aka, what feels like ten years in corona time) producer Molly Webster learned that many of those survivors possess a kind of superpower: antibodies trained to fight the virus. Not only that, they might be able to pass this power on to the people who are sick with corona, and still in the fight. Today we have the story of an experimental treatment that's popping up all over the country: convalescent plasma transfusion, a century-old procedure that some say may become one of our best weapons against this devastating, new disease.   If you have recovered from Covid-19 and want to donate plasma, national and local donation registries are gearing up to collect blood.  To sign up with the American Red Cross, a national organization that works in local communities, head here.  To find out more about the The National COVID-19 Convalescent Plasma Project, which we spoke about in our episode, including information on clinical trials or plasma donation projects in your community, go here.  And if you are in the greater New York City area, and want to donate convalescent plasma, head over to the New York Blood Center to sign up. Or, register with specific NYC hospitals here.   If you are sick with Covid-19, and are interested in participating in a clinical trial, or are looking for a plasma donor match, check in with your local hospital, university, or blood center for more; you can also find more information on trials at The National COVID-19 Convalescent Plasma Project. And lastly, Tatiana Prowell's tweet that tipped us off is here. This episode was reported by Molly Webster and produced by Pat Walters. Special thanks to Drs. Evan Bloch and Tim Byun, as well as the Albert Einstein College of Medicine.  Support Radiolab today at