Post-9/11 foreign policy: traditional and dangerous

May 25, 2005

An article published in the latest issue of Diplomatic History examines Bush's post 9/11 national security strategy in a historical perspective. In doing so, author Melvyn P. Leffler finds that there is nothing new or revolutionary about the Bush administration's foreign policy. Focusing on values and stressing moral clarity, as President Bush has done, are traditional means to mobilize public support, especially in times of heightened threat perception. 9/11 left America feeling threatened and, as the author suggests, US leaders feeling a combination of guilt, outrage, and responsibility. "Like other times in American History, when threat perception has been high, policymakers gravitate to rhetorical strategies emphasizing ideals and values," Leffler explains.

This heightened threat perception tempts officials to stake their policy as universal and their American values as superior. "There is no greater and sadder irony, perhaps even tragedy, that while Bush officials assert the superiority of American values, the overweening use of American powers breeds cynicism about US motives and distrust of US intentions," the author states. A resent survey of world public opinion by the Pew Research Center revealed the negative effects of the Bush foreign policy. The majority of people in countries like Pakistan, Turkey, Jordan, and Morocco believe the US ignores their interests when creating foreign policy. Many see the US as seeking to dominate the world and, specifically, the Middle East for its oil. Osama bin Laden is looked on favorably by the majority of Pakistanis and Jordanians, 65 and 55 percent. The reputation of the US is low. "The balance between ideals and interests has been dangerously skewed in favor of the former, and the result may be an ominous overassertion of American power," Leffler concludes. "...Interests need to temper ideals and discipline power. This does not require a revolution in thinking; it requires the exercise of good judgment."

These articles are published in the Diplomatic History roundtable issue on The Bush Administration's Foreign Policy in Historical Prospective. As the sole journal devoted to the history of U.S. diplomacy, foreign relations, and national security, Diplomatic History examines issues from the colonial period to the present in a global and comparative context. It is published on behalf of The Society for Historians of American Foreign Relations.

This roundtable issue includes: Professor Leffler's analysis followed by comments by six prominent historians, political scientists, and journalists with differing positions on the Bush administration's foreign policy and Professor Leffler's analysis. Bush supporter Robert Kagan discusses two quibbles with Leffler's analysis and Walter L. Hixson discusses his theme of continuity in foreign policy. While Carolyn Eisenberg concentrates Cold War comparisons and Daniel W. Drezner on international relations. Arnold A. Offner argues that recalibration of balance is needed and Anna Kasten Nelson that a noticeable change did occur. Lastly, Leffler responds.

Melvyn Leffler has been writing about the history of U.S. foreign policy for thirty years. He has published many articles and essays on U.S. policy toward Western Europe between World War I and World War II and even more articles and essays on U.S. diplomacy during the Cold War.

Professor Leffler is available for questions and interviews.

Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Related National Security Articles from Brightsurf:

Men less likely to see food as national security issue amid pandemic
On average, men not only showed less empathy toward temporary agricultural laborers but also were less likely to see food supply and production as national security issues, according to a study led by a Washington State University researcher.

National trash: Reducing waste produced in US national parks
When you think of national parks, you might picture the vast plateaus of the Grand Canyon, the intricate wetlands of the Everglades, or the inspiring viewscapes of the Grand Tetons.

UBC study: Publicizing a firm's security levels may strengthen security over time
New research from the UBC Sauder School of Business has quantified the security levels of more than 1,200 Pan-Asian companies in order to determine whether increased awareness of one's security levels leads to improved defense levels against cybercrime.

3-D printing of weapons threatens security on global, national and personal level
A new RAND Corporation paper suggests additive manufacturing could benefit military adversaries, violent extremists and even street criminals, who could produce their own weapons for use and sale.

National Academies review of the draft Fourth National Climate Assessment
The US Global Change Research Program (USGCRP) asked the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine to review the draft Fourth National Climate Assessment (NCA4) -- a congressionally mandated report that evaluates the state of climate science and the broad range of impacts of climate change in the United States every four years - and the draft Second State of the Carbon Cycle Report (SOCCR2) - a report that feeds into the overall assessment process developed by USGCRP.

Morgridge, UW scientists explore national security implications of gene editing
A trio of scientists from the University of Wisconsin-Madison and the Morgridge Institute for Research participated in an international think tank this month on the intersection of genome editing technology and national security.

Installing solar to combat national security risks in the power grid
Power grid vulnerabilities are one of the most prevalent national security threats.

Bring your own (security) disaster
Bring your own device (BYOD) to work is common practice these days.

Blurring of national security interests & global health agendas are an unavoidable reality
Society must align the overlapping priorities and often clashing interests of medical intelligence, national security agendas and the global health community, according to global health advocates writing in the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

Steve Elgar named National Security Science and Engineering Faculty Fellow
Steve Elgar, a senior scientist at Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, has been selected as a 2016 National Security Science and Engineering Faculty Fellow by the Department of Defense.

Read More: National Security News and National Security Current Events is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to