Nav: Home

Kidney transplantations: Better results with larger case volumes

May 25, 2020

In complex surgery, is there a correlation between the volume of services provided per hospital and the quality of treatment results? This is the question addressed in eight commissions on minimum volumes that the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) awarded to the Institute of Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG). The IQWiG report is now available for the fifth intervention to be tested, kidney transplantations.

According to the findings, for kidney transplantations there is a correlation between the volume of services and the quality of treatment results: In hospitals with larger case volumes, the survival probabilities are higher up to one year after transplantation. No correlation between the volume of services and the quality of treatment results can be inferred for the outcome "transplant failure".

The most common organ transplantation in Germany

In chronic kidney failure, which is mostly caused by diabetes or high blood pressure, kidney transplantation is the only treatment option besides dialysis. The organ is donated either as a post-mortem donation or as a living donation from direct relatives or people very close to the patient. Five years after transplantation, 78 percent of post-mortem kidney donations and 87 percent of living kidney donations still function in the new body (figures for Europe). Kidney transplantation is the most common organ transplantation in Germany: In 2018, doctors in Germany transplanted 1671 kidneys after post-mortem organ donation and 638 kidneys after living donation. The waiting list for a donor kidney included more than 7500 patients in the same year. The average waiting time for a kidney transplant is currently more than 8 years.

Currently, a minimum of 25 procedures per hospital location and year is required for kidney transplantations (including living donations) in Germany. In contrast to the regulation on the annual minimum volume for liver transplantations, organ removals are not counted as part of the number of procedures required to achieve the minimum volumes.

Positive correlation between volume of services and survival probability

The question as to whether hospitals with larger case volumes achieve better treatment results for kidney transplantations than hospitals with smaller case volumes can be answered affirmatively by IQWiG for the survival probabilities of patients on the basis of a short-term observation period: For all-cause mortality up to 12 months after transplantation, two of the three studies assessed in this context show a lower probability of dying with a higher volume of services, although the informative value of the results is low. The IQWiG researchers cannot infer such a correlation for medium-term all-cause mortality after 36 months, for which a US study had collected data. After analysing the data from two relevant studies, the Institute also sees no correlation overall between the volume of services and the quality of treatment results for the outcome "transplant failure". No usable data were available for the outcomes "adverse effects of treatment", "health-related quality of life" and "length of hospital stay", so that no conclusions can be drawn here.

Since none of the included studies considered the individual volumes of services of the surgeons, it is also not possible to assess whether greater routine in kidney transplantations leads to better treatment results.

There are no studies on the effects of specific minimum case volumes introduced into the health care system for kidney transplantations. IQWiG can therefore draw no conclusions here either.

Process of report production

In February 2019, the G-BA commissioned IQWiG to prepare the report on the correlation between the volume of services and the quality of treatment results for kidney transplantations in an accelerated procedure as a so-called rapid report. Interim products were therefore not published or made available for a hearing. The work on the project started in August 2019. This rapid report was sent to the contracting agency, the G-BA, in April 2020.

An English extract of this rapid report will be available soon. If you would like to be informed when it is published, please contact

Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care

Related Health Care Articles:

Modifiable health risks linked to more than $730 billion in US health care costs
Modifiable health risks, such as obesity, high blood pressure, and smoking, were linked to over $730 billion in health care spending in the US in 2016, according to a study published in The Lancet Public Health.
Mental health outcomes among health care workers during COVID-19 pandemic in Italy
Symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder, depression, anxiety and insomnia among health care workers in Italy during the COVID-19 pandemic are reported in this observational study.
Spending on primary care vs. other US health care expenditures
National health care survey data were used to assess the amount of money spent on primary care relative to other areas of health care spending in the US from 2002 to 2016.
MU Health Care neurologist publishes guidance related to COVID-19 and stroke care
A University of Missouri Health Care neurologist has published more than 40 new recommendations for evaluating and treating stroke patients based on international research examining the link between stroke and novel coronavirus (COVID-19).
Large federal program aimed at providing better health care underfunds primary care
Despite a mandate to help patients make better-informed health care decisions, a ten-year research program established under the Affordable Care Act has funded a relatively small number of studies that examine primary care, the setting where the majority of patients in the US receive treatment.
International medical graduates care for Medicare patients with greater health care needs
A study by a Massachusetts General Hospital research team indicates that internal medicine physicians who are graduates of medical schools outside the US care for Medicare patients with more complex medical needs than those cared for by graduates of American medical schools.
The Lancet Global Health: Improved access to care not sufficient to improve health, as epidemic of poor quality care revealed
Of the 8.6 million deaths from conditions treatable by health care, poor-quality care is responsible for an estimated 5 million deaths per year -- more than deaths due to insufficient access to care (3.6 million) .
Under Affordable Care Act, Americans have had more preventive care for heart health
By reducing out-of-pocket costs for preventive treatment, the Affordable Care Act appears to have encouraged more people to have health screenings related to their cardiovascular health.
High-deductible health care plans curb both cost and usage, including preventive care
A team of researchers based at IUPUI has conducted the first systematic review of studies examining the relationship between high-deductible health care plans and the use of health care services.
Medical expenditures rise in most categories except primary care physicians and home health care
This article was published in the July/August 2017 issue of Annals of Family Medicine research journal.
More Health Care News and Health Care Current Events

Trending Science News

Current Coronavirus (COVID-19) News

Top Science Podcasts

We have hand picked the top science podcasts of 2020.
Now Playing: TED Radio Hour

Listen Again: The Power Of Spaces
How do spaces shape the human experience? In what ways do our rooms, homes, and buildings give us meaning and purpose? This hour, TED speakers explore the power of the spaces we make and inhabit. Guests include architect Michael Murphy, musician David Byrne, artist Es Devlin, and architect Siamak Hariri.
Now Playing: Science for the People

#576 Science Communication in Creative Places
When you think of science communication, you might think of TED talks or museum talks or video talks, or... people giving lectures. It's a lot of people talking. But there's more to sci comm than that. This week host Bethany Brookshire talks to three people who have looked at science communication in places you might not expect it. We'll speak with Mauna Dasari, a graduate student at Notre Dame, about making mammals into a March Madness match. We'll talk with Sarah Garner, director of the Pathologists Assistant Program at Tulane University School of Medicine, who takes pathology instruction out of...
Now Playing: Radiolab

What If?
There's plenty of speculation about what Donald Trump might do in the wake of the election. Would he dispute the results if he loses? Would he simply refuse to leave office, or even try to use the military to maintain control? Last summer, Rosa Brooks got together a team of experts and political operatives from both sides of the aisle to ask a slightly different question. Rather than arguing about whether he'd do those things, they dug into what exactly would happen if he did. Part war game part choose your own adventure, Rosa's Transition Integrity Project doesn't give us any predictions, and it isn't a referendum on Trump. Instead, it's a deeply illuminating stress test on our laws, our institutions, and on the commitment to democracy written into the constitution. This episode was reported by Bethel Habte, with help from Tracie Hunte, and produced by Bethel Habte. Jeremy Bloom provided original music. Support Radiolab by becoming a member today at     You can read The Transition Integrity Project's report here.