Nav: Home

Politicians walk the walk, when it comes to financial investments

May 31, 2019

For the most part, politicians do put their money where their mouths are. A recent study of U.S senators and representatives finds that the more liberal a politician's voting record is, the more likely the politician is to invest in socially responsible stocks.

"Socially responsible investments refer to investments in companies that reflect traditionally liberal values, such as environmental sustainability, good labor relations and diversity," says Jesse Ellis, co-author of a paper on the research.

"We wanted to know the extent to which political ideology informed investment decision-making, and publicly elected officials serve as a good case study," says Ellis, who is an associate professor of finance in North Carolina State University's Poole College of Management. The research was done with collaborators at Elon University and Heriot-Watt University.

For the study, researchers looked at data on all of the members who served in the U.S. House of Representatives or the U.S. Senate between 2004 and 2012.

To determine political ideology, the researchers drew on the DW-NOMINATE database, which attributes an ideological score to politicians based on their voting records. To determine which companies each politician invested in, researchers assessed public disclosure statements of each lawmaker's financial holdings. The researchers then looked at each company's score in the MSCI KLD database, which assigns companies a social responsibility score based on: community relations, corporate governance, diversity, employee relations, environment, human rights and product quality.

The results were straightforward. Liberal lawmakers were more likely to invest in socially responsible companies. In addition, the more liberal a lawmaker was, the larger the percentage of the lawmaker's investment portfolio that was made up of socially responsible stocks.

By the same token, the more conservative a lawmaker was, the less likely he or she was to invest in socially responsible companies.

"These findings held true across the political spectrum, but were particularly pronounced for those legislators at the extreme ends of the political spectrum," Ellis says. "We also found that, among all the factors that contribute to a company's social responsibility score, environment, employee relations and diversity were the most closely associated with investment by liberal lawmakers.

"I think the findings indicate a strong relationship between political ideology and how people invest their money," Ellis adds. "It shows that most politicians are walking the walk, investing their money in entities that reflect their political statements.

"More broadly, I think the work suggests that the fate of socially responsible ventures is tied to larger trends of political thought. If liberalism increases, these companies will do well; if conservatism rises, the fortunes of these companies could suffer."
-end-
The paper, "Do Politicians 'Put Their Money Where Their Mouth Is?' Ideology and Portfolio Choice," is published in the journal Management Science. The paper was co-authored by Adam Aiken of Elon and Minjeong Kang of Heriot-Watt. The work was done with support from NC State's Business Sustainability Collaborative Research Grant Program.

North Carolina State University

Related Diversity Articles:

Genetic diversity facilitates cancer therapy
Cancer patients with more different HLA genes respond better to treatment.
A new ranavirus threatens US amphibian diversity
In a study published in the Oct. 15 issue of Ecological Modelling, a team of University of Tennessee researchers along with a colleague from the University of Florida model how a chimeric Frog virus 3 (FV3)-like ranavirus, also known as RCV-Z2, can spread rapidly throughout a population of North American wood frog (Lithobates sylvaticus) tadpoles.
New way to target cancer's diversity and evolution
Scientists have revealed close-up details of a vital molecule involved in the mix and match of genetic information within cells -- opening up the potential to target proteins of this family to combat cancer's diversity and evolution.
Heterogeneity in the workplace: 'Diversity is very important to us -- but not in my team'
Diversity in the workplace is highly sought in theory, but often still lacking in practice.
Diversity increases ecosystem stability
Freiburg's forestry scientists prove that forests that are more diverse are also more productive and more resilient
Diversity on teams leads to positive outcomes, but not for all
Individuals on teams of diverse people working together can have better outcomes than those on teams with similar individuals, research as shown.
Good medicine depends on diversity
Nearly 80 percent who have contributed DNA for research are of European ancestry.
How can organizations promote and benefit from socioeconomic diversity?
A new white paper has been published by the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology.
Back to the sources of neural diversity
The diversity of the tasks the cortex can perform is reflected in the diversity of the neurons that compose it.
Plant diversity increases insect diversity
The more plant species live in grasslands and forests, the more insect species find a habitat there.
More Diversity News and Diversity Current Events

Top Science Podcasts

We have hand picked the top science podcasts of 2019.
Now Playing: TED Radio Hour

In & Out Of Love
We think of love as a mysterious, unknowable force. Something that happens to us. But what if we could control it? This hour, TED speakers on whether we can decide to fall in — and out of — love. Guests include writer Mandy Len Catron, biological anthropologist Helen Fisher, musician Dessa, One Love CEO Katie Hood, and psychologist Guy Winch.
Now Playing: Science for the People

#542 Climate Doomsday
Have you heard? Climate change. We did it. And it's bad. It's going to be worse. We are already suffering the effects of it in many ways. How should we TALK about the dangers we are facing, though? Should we get people good and scared? Or give them hope? Or both? Host Bethany Brookshire talks with David Wallace-Wells and Sheril Kirschenbaum to find out. This episode is hosted by Bethany Brookshire, science writer from Science News. Related links: Why Climate Disasters Might Not Boost Public Engagement on Climate Change on The New York Times by Andrew Revkin The other kind...
Now Playing: Radiolab

An Announcement from Radiolab