ASCO18: Updated Phase 1 results of crizotinib against MET-amplified lung cancer

June 03, 2018

The drug crizotinib has activity against a number of genetic targets relevant to non-small cell lung cancer, already earning FDA-approval against ALK- and ROS1-positive lung cancers. Now updated phase 1 clinical trial results presented at the American Association for Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting 2018 show a 40 percent response rate and 6.7-month median progression-free survival from crizotinib in highly MET-amplified non-small cell lung cancer, as well. The study also identifies new criteria to define "highly MET-amplified" cancer, adjusting the number of MET copies down from 5 per chromosome to 4 per chromosome. By lowering the bar for "high MET amplification", the study suggests that crizotinib may benefit more MET-amplified patients than previously thought.

The study comes in the context of continuing work to target MET amplification in cancer. While alterations in the gene MET have been known to cause lung and other cancers, and drugs have been developed to target MET, these drugs have been largely unsuccessful in the clinic.

"It may not be that there is anything wrong with the drugs; it may be that we haven't known exactly who to give these drugs to," says D. Ross Camidge, MD, PhD, the Joyce Zeff Chair in Lung Cancer Research at the University of Colorado Cancer Center and Director of Thoracic Oncology at the CU School of Medicine.

In fact, there are a few kinds of MET alterations that have been shown to cause and/or drive the growth of cancer. One type, called "MET exon 14 skip mutations", exists in about 4 percent of lung cancers and causes especially slow degradation of the MET protein, leading to improper accumulation. Another type, called MET amplification, increases the number of copies of the MET gene itself, which leads to overproduction of the MET protein.

Amplification can happen in two ways - either there can be multiple copies of the chromosome that holds MET, or one chromosome may come to hold additional copies of the MET gene itself. The latter measurement is the focus on the current trial results, with the question being, How many copies of the MET gene on its chromosome are required to make a patient's cancer sensitive to MET inhibition?

In other words, how amplified does MET need to be for crizotinib to be useful?

There is another way to ask this question: At what ratio of MET:Chromosome is MET likely to be the prime or only genetic driver of the cancer? A 2016 study by the CU Cancer Center Lung Cancer Group led by Sinead Noonan, MD, suggested that at a 5:1 ratio or higher of MET-per-chromosome, lung cancer was almost exclusively driven by MET and not by other genetic alterations. (Refer to the linked study for a more detailed description of the science behind measuring MET amplification.)

Earlier analysis of the phase I clinical trial of crizotinib against MET-amplified lung cancer showed that, indeed, patients with MET:Chromosome ratios greater than or equal to 5 were most likely to have a significant response to the drug. However, a few responses did occur in the next highest group. The current ASCO report of the same study both expands the number of patients and defines a new cut-point to more accurately predict who will respond, namely a MET:Chromosome ratio greater than or equal to four.

Results are reported for thirty-seven patients with MET-amplified non-small cell lung cancer treated with crizotinib. Of these patients, 20 were considered to have "high" MET amplification (MET:Chromosome ratio of 4 or more). Of these 20, eight showed objective responses to treatment (40 percent), with a median progression-free survival of 6.7 months. Two of these patients showed a complete response.

"While using either the gene copy number alone or lower MET amplification ratio simply to categorize more patients as 'MET positive' might be attractive, it hasn't helped the field much. Instead, it has led to giving MET inhibitors to patients who go on to receive little benefit, and along with that, a lot of negative trials and disillusionment in the MET field," says Camidge, the study's first author. "Patients who are MET-amplified at a ratio of greater than or equal to four, denoting MET as the primary driver of their cancer, are rare and probably represent only about a half of a percent of all lung cancer patients. But if it were your mom or dad, you'd want to know and to treat it. These results show that crizotinib may be an attractive treatment option for these patients."

University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus

Related Lung Cancer Articles from Brightsurf:

State-level lung cancer screening rates not aligned with lung cancer burden in the US
A new study reports that state-level lung cancer screening rates were not aligned with lung cancer burden.

The lung microbiome may affect lung cancer pathogenesis and prognosis
Enrichment of the lungs with oral commensal microbes was associated with advanced stage disease, worse prognosis, and tumor progression in patients with lung cancer, according to results from a study published in Cancer Discovery, a journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

New analysis finds lung cancer screening reduces rates of lung cancer-specific death
Low-dose CT screening methods may prevent one death per 250 at-risk adults screened, according to a meta-analysis of eight randomized controlled clinical trials of lung cancer screening.

'Social smokers' face disproportionate risk of death from lung disease and lung cancer
'Social smokers' are more than twice as likely to die of lung disease and more than eight times as likely to die of lung cancer than non-smokers, according to research presented at the European Respiratory Society International Congress.

Lung cancer therapy may improve outcomes of metastatic brain cancer
A medication commonly used to treat non-small cell lung cancer that has spread, or metastasized, may have benefits for patients with metastatic brain cancers, suggests a new review and analysis led by researchers at St.

Cancer mortality continues steady decline, driven by progress against lung cancer
The cancer death rate declined by 29% from 1991 to 2017, including a 2.2% drop from 2016 to 2017, the largest single-year drop in cancer mortality ever reported.

Cancer-sniffing dogs 97% accurate in identifying lung cancer, according to study in JAOA
The next step will be to further fractionate the samples based on chemical and physical properties, presenting them back to the dogs until the specific biomarkers for each cancer are identified.

Lung transplant patients face elevated lung cancer risk
In an American Journal of Transplantation study, lung cancer risk was increased after lung transplantation, especially in the native (non-transplanted) lung of single lung transplant recipients.

Proposed cancer treatment may boost lung cancer stem cells, study warns
Epigenetic therapies -- targeting enzymes that alter what genes are turned on or off in a cell -- are of growing interest in the cancer field as a way of making a cancer less aggressive or less malignant.

Are you at risk for lung cancer?
This question isn't only for people who've smoked a lot.

Read More: Lung Cancer News and Lung Cancer Current Events is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to