Nav: Home

Attitudes may deter African Americans from receiving surgery for non-small cell lung cancer

June 05, 2004

NEW ORLEANS--Do African Americans with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have a lower overall survival rate than Caucasians with the disease because they have less access to adequate medical care, or because they are less likely to agree to lung surgery when offered?

A study by investigators at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute offers evidence that both factors may play a role. The data will be presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (Saturday, June 5, 2 p.m., R02 2nd Floor - Escalators 1 & 2).

Researchers led by Dana-Farber's Christopher Lathan, MD, used Medicare data to compare treatment and survival rates among some 24,000 African American and Caucasian patients with NSCLC that had not spread beyond the lungs. They found that procedures to determine the stage - or degree of advancement - of the cancer were performed less frequently in African Americans than in Caucasians, and that African Americans who did receive such staging were still less likely to have a lung operation for the disease. Among patients who underwent surgery to treat the disease, survival rates for African Americans and Caucasians were equivalent.

The researchers further found that African Americans whose tumors were staged were less likely than Caucasians to be recommended for surgery, but twice as likely to decline surgery when it was recommended.

"Our results suggest that there are African Americans patients who could benefit from surgery for NSCLC but aren't receiving it," Lathan says. "The barriers to surgery may include African American patients' being less likely to be offered surgery in borderline cases, or being less accepting of recommendations for surgery." He and his colleagues hope to sort out these possibilities in future research.
-end-
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (www.danafarber.org) is a principal teaching affiliate of the Harvard Medical School and is among the leading cancer research and care centers in the United States. It is a founding member of the Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, designated a comprehensive cancer center by the National Cancer Institute.

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Related Cancer Articles:

Stress in cervical cancer patients associated with higher risk of cancer-specific mortality
Psychological stress was associated with a higher risk of cancer-specific mortality in women diagnosed with cervical cancer.
Cancer-sniffing dogs 97% accurate in identifying lung cancer, according to study in JAOA
The next step will be to further fractionate the samples based on chemical and physical properties, presenting them back to the dogs until the specific biomarkers for each cancer are identified.
Moffitt Cancer Center researchers identify one way T cell function may fail in cancer
Moffitt Cancer Center researchers have discovered a mechanism by which one type of immune cell, CD8+ T cells, can become dysfunctional, impeding its ability to seek and kill cancer cells.
More cancer survivors, fewer cancer specialists point to challenge in meeting care needs
An aging population, a growing number of cancer survivors, and a projected shortage of cancer care providers will result in a challenge in delivering the care for cancer survivors in the United States if systemic changes are not made.
New cancer vaccine platform a potential tool for efficacious targeted cancer therapy
Researchers at the University of Helsinki have discovered a solution in the form of a cancer vaccine platform for improving the efficacy of oncolytic viruses used in cancer treatment.
More Cancer News and Cancer Current Events

Best Science Podcasts 2019

We have hand picked the best science podcasts for 2019. Sit back and enjoy new science podcasts updated daily from your favorite science news services and scientists.
Now Playing: TED Radio Hour

Rethinking Anger
Anger is universal and complex: it can be quiet, festering, justified, vengeful, and destructive. This hour, TED speakers explore the many sides of anger, why we need it, and who's allowed to feel it. Guests include psychologists Ryan Martin and Russell Kolts, writer Soraya Chemaly, former talk radio host Lisa Fritsch, and business professor Dan Moshavi.
Now Playing: Science for the People

#537 Science Journalism, Hold the Hype
Everyone's seen a piece of science getting over-exaggerated in the media. Most people would be quick to blame journalists and big media for getting in wrong. In many cases, you'd be right. But there's other sources of hype in science journalism. and one of them can be found in the humble, and little-known press release. We're talking with Chris Chambers about doing science about science journalism, and where the hype creeps in. Related links: The association between exaggeration in health related science news and academic press releases: retrospective observational study Claims of causality in health news: a randomised trial This...