Nav: Home

When combining new oral anti-cancer agents with standard chemotherapy, timing may be crucial

June 05, 2004

(NEW ORLEANS) -- Timing may be everything when it comes to combining the new-generation oral, molecularly targeted anti-cancer agents with standard chemotherapy drugs, UC Davis Cancer Center researchers reported Saturday at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncologists.

"Many of the new molecularly targeted anti-cancer agents work by inhibiting cancer cell division and growth -- but in doing so, the new agents could diminish the effectiveness of chemotherapy, which depends on rapid cell cycling," said senior investigator Paul Gumerlock, professor of hematology/oncology at UC Davis Cancer Center. "Because of this, it could be very important in what sequence the new agents are combined with standard chemotherapy drugs."

To test the notion, Gumerlock and his colleagues focused on a new oral epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor known as erlotinib. Recently, several large clinical trials have compared standard chemotherapy alone to standard chemotherapy plus an oral EGFR inhibitor like erlotinib in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Little if any benefit was found from the addition of an EGFR inhibitor in these trials, in which the EGFR inhibitor and chemotherapy were administered simultaneously.

The UC Davis Cancer Center team set out to determine whether sequential administration would make a difference. The researchers tested erlotinib alone, the standard chemotherapy agent docetaxel alone, the two drugs simultaneously, and the two drugs sequentially. All the tests were done in the laboratory using human non-small cell lung cancer cells.

"We predicted that giving docetaxel first, then erlotinib, would be more effective than giving the erlotinib first, giving both drugs simultaneously or giving either drug alone" Gumerlock said. "And that proved to be true."

Docetaxel, a standard first-line chemotherapy drug for non-small cell lung cancer, works in the same way other standard chemotherapy agents do: by killing rapidly dividing cells. The approach destroys cancer cells, which are characterized by out-of-control growth, but also some healthy growing cells, including cells in hair follicles.

Erlotinib, in contrast, works by blocking certain signals that cancer cells need in order to reach the cell-division stage, or mitosis.

Gumerlock theorizes that when erlotinib is given simultaneously or just before docetaxel, fewer cancer cells reach mitosis and become vulnerable to chemotherapy, thereby diminishing chemotherapy's effectiveness.

Clinical testing will be required to determine whether Gumerlock's laboratory findings hold true in patients. Based on his preclinical work, a phase I trial of docetaxel followed by erlotinib in patients with non-small cell lung cancer is already under way at UC Davis Cancer Center. Angela Davies, assistant professor of hematology/oncology at UC Davis Cancer Center, is principal investigator.

Gumerlock believes timing and sequencing may be crucial when combining chemotherapy with other molecularly targeted agents, not just erlotinib.

In a related presentation at the ASCO meeting, Gumerlock reported that in laboratory testing of tumors in mice, a selective proteasome inhibitor, PS-341, significantly inhibited non-small cell lung cancer growth when administered sequentially with docetaxel. But PS-341 had only a modest effect when delivered alone -- and no effect when delivered simultaneously with docetaxel.

"We've been delivering these drugs the same way we've delivered chemotherapy, assuming that the more we can give, and the longer we can give it, the better," Gumerlock said.

"But that may not be true. These molecularly targeted drugs are oral drugs, with such low toxicity and convenience that they can be given every day. But just because you can give a drug every day, it doesn't mean that is the best regimen. We hope to have some answers soon."
-end-
UC Davis Cancer Center is the only National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center between San Francisco and Portland, Ore., a region the size of Pennsylvania. It is ranked by U.S. News & World Report as one of the nation's top 50 cancer treatment centers.

University of California - Davis Health System

Related Chemotherapy Articles:

Nanotechnology improves chemotherapy delivery
Michigan State University scientists have invented a new way to monitor chemotherapy concentrations, which is more effective in keeping patients' treatments within the crucial therapeutic window.
Novel anti-cancer nanomedicine for efficient chemotherapy
Researchers have developed a new anti-cancer nanomedicine for targeted cancer chemotherapy.
Ending needless chemotherapy for breast cancer
A diagnostic test developed at The University of Queensland might soon determine if a breast cancer patient requires chemotherapy or would receive no benefit from this gruelling treatment.
A homing beacon for chemotherapy drugs
Killing tumor cells while sparing their normal counterparts is a central challenge of cancer chemotherapy.
Chemotherapy or not?
Case Western Reserve University researchers and partners, including a collaborator at Cleveland Clinic, are pushing the boundaries of how 'smart' diagnostic-imaging machines identify cancers -- and uncovering clues outside the tumor to tell whether a patient will respond well to chemotherapy.
More Chemotherapy News and Chemotherapy Current Events

Best Science Podcasts 2019

We have hand picked the best science podcasts for 2019. Sit back and enjoy new science podcasts updated daily from your favorite science news services and scientists.
Now Playing: TED Radio Hour

Rethinking Anger
Anger is universal and complex: it can be quiet, festering, justified, vengeful, and destructive. This hour, TED speakers explore the many sides of anger, why we need it, and who's allowed to feel it. Guests include psychologists Ryan Martin and Russell Kolts, writer Soraya Chemaly, former talk radio host Lisa Fritsch, and business professor Dan Moshavi.
Now Playing: Science for the People

#537 Science Journalism, Hold the Hype
Everyone's seen a piece of science getting over-exaggerated in the media. Most people would be quick to blame journalists and big media for getting in wrong. In many cases, you'd be right. But there's other sources of hype in science journalism. and one of them can be found in the humble, and little-known press release. We're talking with Chris Chambers about doing science about science journalism, and where the hype creeps in. Related links: The association between exaggeration in health related science news and academic press releases: retrospective observational study Claims of causality in health news: a randomised trial This...