Nav: Home

Citizen scientists help infectious bacteria researchers

June 05, 2017

A team of UK based researchers, known as the ENIGMA Project, has developed a novel method for assessing human/virus interactions in the natural environment, using citizen scientists wearing boot socks over their shoes during walks in the countryside.

In the process, they found that slightly less than half of the socks were positive for the infectious disease, Campylobacter.

The ENIGMA project is a large collaborative programme of research taking place across the UK led by Professor Sarah O'Brien from the University of Liverpool's Institute of Psychology, Health and Society.

The most common bacterial cause of diarrhoeal disease in the developed world is Campylobacter. There were approximately 700,000 cases in the UK in 2010 with around 200 deaths. The current annual UK cost of acute Campylobacter infection is around £600 million, exceeding that from Salmonella, Listeria and E. coli O157 combined.


Campylobacter in people is very seasonal. Disease increases sharply in late spring, reaching a peak in early summer. However, this varies in different areas of the country. In NW England the seasonal peak is very pronounced, but is less so in East Anglia. To investigate this marked difference the researchers looked for Campylobacter in the environment in various rural settings to see whether or not the landscape is a direct source of human exposure to Campylobacter.

Once every three weeks for 16 months, and more frequently in the springtime, a group of 60 volunteers put a sock on the outside of one shoe and went for 2.5-mile walks in two regions of the UK, the livestock-dominated North West, and East Anglia, much of which is devoted to cropland.

Then, wearing gloves, the walkers peeled the socks off their feet, placed the dirty garments in biohazard bags and mailed the socks to laboratories run by Public Health England and the University of Liverpool.

These socks were crucial components in the first outdoor survey of its kind -- an attempt to gauge the wild population of campylobacter microbes using the feet of citizen scientists. The results of the study have been published in the journal Applied and Environmental Microbiology.


As measured on boot socks, Campylobacter was more prevalent in livestock-dominated North West than in East Anglia (55.8% of socks, vs 38.6%). Campylobacter peaked during winter in both regions, and peaked again in spring in North West. Precipitation was associated with greater Campylobacter, and higher temperatures with less.

According to the report the results are consistent with our understanding of Campylobacter survival and the probability of material adhering to boot socks.

C. jejuni was the most commonly found species, with C. coli largely restricted to the livestock dominated North West, according to the report. Source attribution analysis suggested that the major source of C. jejuni was sheep in North West, and wild birds in East Anglia.


Professor Sarah O'Brien, said: "The transmission pathways for 50% of human cases of Campylobacter are unknown. Around 40% of cases occur during the 'spring peak'. Yet the relative roles of environmental and food pathways, and their interaction, in this seasonal emergence are poorly understood, if at all.

"Generally, food is often a source of Campylobacter in humans but food alone cannot explain all the cases occurring in the population. This study has helped us examine other potential causes of how the disease is contracted.

"Ultimately, this research could lead to interventions to reduce the disease risk to humans."
The full paper, entitled 'A novel sampling method for assessing human-pathogen interactions in the natural environment using boot socks and citizen scientists, with an application to the seasonality of Campylobacter', can be found here

This research was funded by the Medical Research Council, Natural Environment Research Council, Economic and Social Research Council, Biotechnology and Biosciences Research Council and Food Standards Agency, through the Environmental & Social Ecology of Human Infectious Diseases Initiative (ESEI).

doi: 10.1128/AEM.00162-17

University of Liverpool

Related Infectious Disease Articles:

Infectious disease in marine life linked to decades of ocean warming
New research shows that long-term changes in diseases in ocean species coincides with decades of widespread environmental change.
What makes some people more receptive to the idea of being vaccinated against infectious disease?
Fear, trust, and the likelihood of exposure are three leading factors that influence whether people are willing to be vaccinated against a virulent disease, according to a new study in the journal Heliyon, published by Elsevier.
Can we feed 11 billion people while preventing the spread of infectious disease?
A new article published in Nature Sustainability describes how the increase in population and the need to feed everyone will give rise to human infectious disease, a situation the authors of the paper consider 'two of the most formidable ecological and public health challenges of the 21st century.'
Coat of proteins makes viruses more infectious and links them to Alzheimer's disease
New research from Stockholm University and Karolinska Institutet shows that viruses interact with proteins in the biological fluids of their host which results in a layer of proteins on the viral surface.
Climate change responsible for severe infectious disease in UK frogs
Climate change has already increased the spread and severity of a fatal disease caused by Ranavirus that infects common frogs (Rana temporaria) in the UK, according to research led by ZSL's Institute of Zoology, UCL and Queen Mary University of London published today in Global Change Biology.
More Infectious Disease News and Infectious Disease Current Events

Best Science Podcasts 2019

We have hand picked the best science podcasts for 2019. Sit back and enjoy new science podcasts updated daily from your favorite science news services and scientists.
Now Playing: TED Radio Hour

Rethinking Anger
Anger is universal and complex: it can be quiet, festering, justified, vengeful, and destructive. This hour, TED speakers explore the many sides of anger, why we need it, and who's allowed to feel it. Guests include psychologists Ryan Martin and Russell Kolts, writer Soraya Chemaly, former talk radio host Lisa Fritsch, and business professor Dan Moshavi.
Now Playing: Science for the People

#537 Science Journalism, Hold the Hype
Everyone's seen a piece of science getting over-exaggerated in the media. Most people would be quick to blame journalists and big media for getting in wrong. In many cases, you'd be right. But there's other sources of hype in science journalism. and one of them can be found in the humble, and little-known press release. We're talking with Chris Chambers about doing science about science journalism, and where the hype creeps in. Related links: The association between exaggeration in health related science news and academic press releases: retrospective observational study Claims of causality in health news: a randomised trial This...