French footballing loss will be Le Pen's gain, says expert

June 10, 2002

A WORLD Cup exit for the multi-ethnic French football team will be seen as a major political boost for the country's Far Right leader, Jean-Marie Le Pen, says a leading French football expert.

The French team must beat Denmark by two goals in the match on Tuesday (June 11) if it is to stay in the international tournament.

If it loses, this will be a major victory for Le Pen, who criticised the 'black-white-brown' (the French say: 'black-blanc-beur' (1) ), multi-racial make-up of the winning team during the 1998 World Cup. Le Pen claimed that some of the foreign-born players did not even know the French national anthem.

A world footballing loss will be even more politically significant with the first round of the French parliamentary elections taking place on Sunday, June 9, and with Le Pen's near victory in the recent presidential elections.

Dr Geoff Hare, an expert in French football of the School of Modern Languages, Newcastle University, says a premature departure from this World Cup will also be a huge blow to the country's fragile national pride, which was bruised for years following a series of humiliating events, including the World War Two German Occupation and the crumbling of the French Empire in North Africa and beyond. Until their win in the 1998 World Cup, French people saw themselves in losers in everything, including football.

Dr Hare is due to publish a book on French football, and co-edited a major publication about the impact of the 1998 World Cup on France. He says:

"One of the hugely significant things during the 1998 World Cup is that the French team was composed of players of various multi-ethnic backgrounds, many originating from the former French Empire. They were multi-coloured, the 'black-blanc-beur' of French football. This actually became a major ideological and political issue in France.

"It was felt at the time that this was a symbol of the new, racially tolerant France - but to the French National Front this was a big setback for the nation. The team was openly criticised by Le Pen.

"When this multi-racial team won the World Cup, there was a huge euphoria, and it was also felt that this was a victory over the Far Right in France.

"Since then France has had an enormous shock. Before the start of this World Cup there has been the great expression of support for Le Pen during the presidential elections and a huge gloom has descended over the nation."

Dr Hare added that the French team had even got involved in the country's politics during the presidential elections, publicly urging people to vote for Jacques Chirac to keep Le Pen out of power.

He added:

"A loss at the World Cup for this multi-racial team which were once champions will be a severe dent to the French national pride and, more significantly, a victory for the National Front who criticised them back in 1998."
Contact: For more details contact Newcastle University Press Office + 44 191 222 7850 and email

Notes to editors:

1. The French word for black is 'noir' but the English word has been incorporated into the French language and is widely used. Beur is slang derived from the French word for Arab, 'Arabe'.


  • Information about 'France and the 1998 World Cup' (ed. H.Dauncey and G. Hare)
  • Geoff Hare's home page:
  • French team condems Le Pen:

    Newcastle University

    Related Presidential Elections Articles from Brightsurf:

    Fashion's underappreciated role in presidential politics
    New research reveals style plays an underappreciated role in presidential politics and has meaningful consequences for presidential power.

    Forecasting elections with a model of infectious diseases
    Election forecasting is an innately challenging endeavor, with results that can be difficult to interpret and may leave many questions unanswered after close races unfold.

    Coordinated efforts on Twitter to interfere in US elections are foreign-based
    An analysis of more than 2.2 million tweets has found a coordinated effort to influence the upcoming U.S. presidential election by sowing distrust, exacerbating political divisions and undermining confidence in American democracy.

    A change at the top before elections boosts MP turnover across Europe, research shows
    Appointing a new leader just before an election leads to a higher turnover of MPs after the poll, a study of political parties across Europe during the past 80 years shows.

    Paper ballots, risk-limiting audits can help defend elections and democracy, study finds
    With just over two months before the 2020 election, three professors at the Indiana University Kelley School of Business offer a comprehensive review of how other nations are seeking to protect their democratic institutions and presents how a multifaceted, targeted approach is needed to achieve that goal in the U.S., where intelligence officials have warned that Russia and other rivals are again attempting to undermine our democracy.

    Mandatory vote-by-mail modestly increases voter turnout without giving either party an edge in elections, study suggests
    Mandatory vote-by-mail modestly increases voter turnout without advantaging one party over the other, according to a causal inference analysis of 30 years of nationwide US county-level data and more than 40 million individual-level voter records from the states of Washington and Utah.

    Do campaign finance reforms truly help make elections more competitive?
    A new study by two social scientists at the University of Missouri finds state campaign finance reforms actually have no beneficial effect on the competitiveness of state legislative elections.

    Spanish language increasingly more relevant to presidential elections
    Discourse in and about Spanish was present on both sides of the political spectrum, more so leading up to the 2016 presidential election than in previous cycles, according to research conducted by faculty at Binghamton University, State University of New York.

    'Game changer' for reporters: 2016 US presidential election coverage
    The 2016 US presidential election is considered a 'game changer' for journalists covering the US presidential elections by causing them to dramatically reconsider how they view their role -- either as neutral disseminators of information or impassioned advocates for the truth -- according to researchers at the University of Missouri's School of Journalism.

    'She' goes missing from presidential language
    MIT researchers have found that although a significant percentage of the American public believed the winner of the November 2016 presidential election would be a woman, people rarely used the pronoun 'she' when referring to the next president before the election.

    Read More: Presidential Elections News and Presidential Elections Current Events
  • is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to