Molecular mechanism for learning and memory is identified

June 18, 2000

EVANSTON, Ill. -- In a study to be published in the June 20 issue of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, researchers at Northwestern University report new insights into the biological and molecular underpinnings of learning and memory.

Past research has shown that a growth-associated protein, called GAP-43, that is found in neurons and no other organ of the body, is required for the growth of nerve cell processes during the brain's early development and later during neuronal regeneration. What was not known was whether or not GAP-43 could alter axonal growth and synaptic change, elements crucial to learning and memory.

Now, a research team led by Aryeh Routtenberg, professor of psychology, neurobiology and physiology, has demonstrated that GAP-43, when overexpressed in a phosphorylatable form, enhances learning and memory in the mammalian brain. The findings could provide a novel target for new drugs to combat memory loss and learning disorders.

"This is the first evidence that demonstrates that GAP-43 does indeed regulate learning," said Routtenberg. "It does so by accelerating the rate at which learning occurs. Our findings specify the particular sequence of chemical reactions that are involved in the process of storing information."

Routtenberg and his team have demonstrated that genetically engineered mice that have more phosphorylatable GAP-43 in their brains learn tasks more quickly and can forget one strategy in order to learn a diametrically opposed strategy. Experiments also showed that mice overexpressing a form of GAP-43 that could not be phosphorylated had no learning enhancement.

Phosphorylation is a fundamental molecular process in which a phosphate is transferred to a protein, causing the protein to change shape and function. In the case of GAP-43, the protein kinase C (PKC) is the enzyme responsible for its phosphorylation.

The researchers first studied four different types of mice and their ability to learn by putting them through a battery of tests. The tests of spatial and working memory became increasingly complex, requiring the mice to learn from earlier tests in order to locate food in an eight-arm maze.

One strain of mice, called WT, had the normal GAP-43 found naturally in the mouse brain. The three genetically engineered strains had different forms of overexpressed GAP-43, in addition to the normal GAP-43. These included a form that is phosphorylatable (called GPhos), a form that is permanently phosphorylated (called GPerm) and a form that cannot be phosphorylated (called GNonP).

The overall results showed that the GPhos mice were dramatically more adept at accomplishing their tasks in a shorter period of time than the other mice, and, in fact, performed better as the task got more difficult. At the same time, the GNonP mice demonstrated difficulty in performing their tasks.

"The genetic difference between the smart mice and the slower mice, who are unable to phosphorylate GAP-43, is just one base pair in its DNA," said Routtenberg. "This is a dramatic example of how a mutation can have a significant impact on the ability of an animal to learn."

Next, Routtenberg and his team wanted to determine if there were actual differences between the mice in their neural networks involved in the memory process. This required measuring the mice's long-term potentiation (LTP), a model of memory based on the strengthening of connections between nerve cells.

Results showed that the GPhos and GPerm mice, the ones with phosphorylatable GAP-43, had enhanced LTP following the learning and memory tests. The researchers concluded that communication among brain cells is altered during learning and that this, in turn, helps the formation of neural networks that are required to store information, learn and remember.

"It may be the case that GAP-43 works in some ways like insulin," said Routtenberg, "facilitating the metabolic process, accelerating synaptic communication and increasing the rate at which memory is stored. This has important implications for learning."

The researchers are now moving on to the next question. Do normal mice that learn more quickly have more GAP-43 in the learning and memory areas of their brains? That is the subject of a new set of experiments now under way.
Other authors on the paper are Isabel Cantallops, Sal Zaffuto, Peter Serrano and Uk Namgung, from Northwestern University.

The research was supported by the Whitehall Foundation and the National Science Foundation.

(Note to reporters: To receive a copy of the paper, contact the Office of News and Public Information at the National Academy of Sciences at 202-334-2138.)


Northwestern University

Related Memory Articles from Brightsurf:

Memory of the Venus flytrap
In a study to be published in Nature Plants, a graduate student Mr.

Memory protein
When UC Santa Barbara materials scientist Omar Saleh and graduate student Ian Morgan sought to understand the mechanical behaviors of disordered proteins in the lab, they expected that after being stretched, one particular model protein would snap back instantaneously, like a rubber band.

Previously claimed memory boosting font 'Sans Forgetica' does not actually boost memory
It was previously claimed that the font Sans Forgetica could enhance people's memory for information, however researchers from the University of Warwick and the University of Waikato, New Zealand, have found after carrying out numerous experiments that the font does not enhance memory.

Memory boost with just one look
HRL Laboratories, LLC, researchers have published results showing that targeted transcranial electrical stimulation during slow-wave sleep can improve metamemories of specific episodes by 20% after only one viewing of the episode, compared to controls.

VR is not suited to visual memory?!
Toyohashi university of technology researcher and a research team at Tokyo Denki University have found that virtual reality (VR) may interfere with visual memory.

The genetic signature of memory
Despite their importance in memory, the human cortex and subcortex display a distinct collection of 'gene signatures.' The work recently published in eNeuro increases our understanding of how the brain creates memories and identifies potential genes for further investigation.

How long does memory last? For shape memory alloys, the longer the better
Scientists captured live action details of the phase transitions of shape memory alloys, giving them a better idea how to improve their properties for applications.

A NEAT discovery about memory
UAB researchers say over expression of NEAT1, an noncoding RNA, appears to diminish the ability of older brains to form memories.

Molecular memory can be used to increase the memory capacity of hard disks
Researchers at the University of Jyväskylä have taken part in an international British-Finnish-Chinese collaboration where the first molecule capable of remembering the direction of a magnetic above liquid nitrogen temperatures has been prepared and characterized.

Memory transferred between snails
Memories can be transferred between organisms by extracting ribonucleic acid (RNA) from a trained animal and injecting it into an untrained animal, as demonstrated in a study of sea snails published in eNeuro.

Read More: Memory News and Memory Current Events is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to