Not Only Expert Panels But Practicing Physicians Should Contribute To Practice Guidelines

June 25, 1998

Insurance Plans May Make Some Coverage Decisions Based On Incomplete Data

BOSTON--June 19, 1998--A five-state study by Harvard researchers suggests that in certain cases, medical practice guidelines and the treatment recommended by practicing physicians may be two different things.

The researchers say that in other kinds of cases, for which clinical research is more complete, the practicing physicians closely agree with clinical experts, whose beliefs are reflected in most practice guidelines.

The study found that practicing physicians and clinical experts, who may be more familiar with published research, disagree on how to treat the most elderly heart attack patients. Yet experts develop the majority of practice guidelines, which are widely used by insurance plans to determine the treatments that will--and will not--be covered. The researchers say that evaluations of medical practice, part of the basis of practice guidelines, should be founded on the beliefs not only of expert panels but also of practicing physicians. Including the practitioners' perspective would increase the breadth of clinical experience the guidelines represent. The researchers also recommend that more clinical research be done on the most elderly patients--those 75 and older--so medical literature can reflect more complete clinical results.

"This is one of the first large-scale studies on practice patterns to take into account the beliefs of practicing physicians," says lead author John Ayanian, assistant professor of medicine and health care policy at Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School. "It is important for policymakers to understand practicing physicians beliefs if they want to improve care by altering physician behavior and decision-making," Ayanian says.

The study appears in the June 25 New England Journal of Medicine along with a second article and an editorial on quality of care. The second article, co-authored by Lucien Leape of the Harvard School of Public Health, compares the beliefs of different expert panels.

The Medical School researchers presented a mix of cases to 1,058 practicing physicians and a panel of nine clinical experts. The physicians rated the appropriateness of coronary angiography for 20 categories of patients who had recently had a heart attack (acute myocardial infarction). This procedure, x-ray imaging of the coronary arteries after injection of a contrast material, helps in diagnosing the cause of the heart attack and in planning further treatment. The practicing physicians included internists, family practitioners, and cardiologists in California, Florida, New York, Pennsylvania, and Texas. The nine experts also represented a range of specialties.

Though there was general agreement between the practicing physicians and expert panel for most case categories, those in which the patient was 75 or older and had no complications resulted in significant variation between the two groups.

"One potential explanation is that practicing physicians have more experience in seeing positive benefits of angiography for older patients, while the expert panel may be following the medical literature more closely. We don't have an abundant set of data to guide us for older patients," Ayanian says. "We need to improve the evidence available through clinical research to guide us in the care of these patients."

Disagreement also existed within the group of practicing physicians. Their varying expertise and practice environment seemed to influence their beliefs. For complicated cases, cardiologists rated coronary angiography as more appropriate than did primary care physicians. Even among cardiologists, marked variation existed for uncomplicated cases: those who performed invasive procedures gave higher ratings for the appropriateness of angiography than did cardiologists who did not. Furthermore, physicians from hospitals providing invasive treatments like coronary angioplasty--unclogging a plaque-filled artery by inserting a balloon catheter--and bypass surgery rated angiography as more appropriate in uncomplicated cases than did physicians from other hospitals. Physicians working in health maintenance organizations rated angiography as less appropriate than did other physicians.

The decision about whether to perform coronary angiography is a central issue in the care of heart attack patients. The common choice is whether to perform angiography, perhaps leading to angioplasty, or to dissolve blood clots with a thrombolytic medication such as TPA or streptokinase.

The 20 case categories in the study are defined by sets of clinical indications: patient age, time of heart attack, status of thrombolytic therapy, and presence of complications such as chest pain (see attached chart). The physicians rated the appropriateness of coronary angiography for patients in each category using a nine-unit scale with 1 being very inappropriate; 5, uncertain; and 9, very appropriate.

The study, whose senior author is Barbara McNeil, chair of the Department of Health Care Policy at Harvard Medical School, was supported by a grant from the federal Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. * The ratings were on a 9-unit scale ranging from very inappropriate (1) to uncertain (5) and very appropriate (9).
-end-


Harvard Medical School

Related Heart Attack Articles from Brightsurf:

Top Science Tip Sheet on heart failure, heart muscle cells, heart attack and atrial fibrillation results
Newly discovered pathway may have potential for treating heart failure - New research model helps predict heart muscle cells' impact on heart function after injury - New mass spectrometry approach generates libraries of glycans in human heart tissue - Understanding heart damage after heart attack and treatment may provide clues for prevention - Understanding atrial fibrillation's effects on heart cells may help find treatments - New research may lead to therapy for heart failure caused by ICI cancer medication

Molecular imaging identifies link between heart and kidney inflammation after heart attack
Whole body positron emission tomography (PET) has, for the first time, illustrated the existence of inter-organ communication between the heart and kidneys via the immune system following acute myocardial infarction.

Muscle protein abundant in the heart plays key role in blood clotting during heart attack
A prevalent heart protein known as cardiac myosin, which is released into the body when a person suffers a heart attack, can cause blood to thicken or clot--worsening damage to heart tissue, a new study shows.

New target identified for repairing the heart after heart attack
An immune cell is shown for the first time to be involved in creating the scar that repairs the heart after damage.

Heart cells respond to heart attack and increase the chance of survival
The heart of humans and mice does not completely recover after a heart attack.

A simple method to improve heart-attack repair using stem cell-derived heart muscle cells
The heart cannot regenerate muscle after a heart attack, and this can lead to lethal heart failure.

Mount Sinai discovers placental stem cells that can regenerate heart after heart attack
Study identifies new stem cell type that can significantly improve cardiac function.

Fixing a broken heart: Exploring new ways to heal damage after a heart attack
The days immediately following a heart attack are critical for survivors' longevity and long-term healing of tissue.

Heart patch could limit muscle damage in heart attack aftermath
Guided by computer simulations, an international team of researchers has developed an adhesive patch that can provide support for damaged heart tissue, potentially reducing the stretching of heart muscle that's common after a heart attack.

How the heart sends an SOS signal to bone marrow cells after a heart attack
Exosomes are key to the SOS signal that the heart muscle sends out after a heart attack.

Read More: Heart Attack News and Heart Attack Current Events
Brightsurf.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.